Decapodes: A Diagrammatic Tool for Representing, Composing, and Computing Spatialized Partial Differential Equations
Authors:
Luke Morris,
Andrew Baas,
Jesus Arias,
Maia Gatlin,
Evan Patterson,
James P. Fairbanks
Abstract:
We present Decapodes, a diagrammatic tool for representing, composing, and solving partial differential equations. Decapodes provides an intuitive diagrammatic representation of the relationships between variables in a system of equations, a method for composing systems of partial differential equations using an operad of wiring diagrams, and an algorithm for deriving solvers using hypergraphs and…
▽ More
We present Decapodes, a diagrammatic tool for representing, composing, and solving partial differential equations. Decapodes provides an intuitive diagrammatic representation of the relationships between variables in a system of equations, a method for composing systems of partial differential equations using an operad of wiring diagrams, and an algorithm for deriving solvers using hypergraphs and string diagrams. The string diagrams are in turn compiled into executable programs using the techniques of categorical data migration, graph traversal, and the discrete exterior calculus. The generated solvers produce numerical solutions consistent with state-of-the-art open source tools as demonstrated by benchmark comparisons with SU2. These numerical experiments demonstrate the feasibility of this approach to multiphysics simulation and identify areas requiring further development.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
Consilience: A Holistic Measure of Goodness-of-Fit
Authors:
William H. Neill,
Ray H. Kamps,
Scott J. Walker,
Hsin-i Wu,
T. Scott Brandes,
Delbert M. Gatlin III,
Tiffany L. Hopper,
Robert R. Vega
Abstract:
We describe an apparently new measure of multivariate goodness-of-fit between sets of quantitative results from a model (simulation, analytical, or multiple regression), paired with those observed under corresponding conditions from the system being modeled. Our approach returns a single, integrative measure, even though it can accommodate complex systems that produce responses of M types. For eac…
▽ More
We describe an apparently new measure of multivariate goodness-of-fit between sets of quantitative results from a model (simulation, analytical, or multiple regression), paired with those observed under corresponding conditions from the system being modeled. Our approach returns a single, integrative measure, even though it can accommodate complex systems that produce responses of M types. For each response-type, the goodness-of-fit measure, which we label "Consilience" (C), is maximally 1, for perfect fit; near 0 for the large-sample case (number of pairs, N, more than about 25) in which the modeled series is a random sample from a quasi-normal distribution with the same mean and variance as that of the observed series (null model); and, less than 0, toward minus-infinity, for progressively worse fit. In addition, lack-of-fit for each response-type can be apportioned between systematic and non-systematic (unexplained) components of error. Finally, for statistical assessment of models relative to the equivalent null model, we offer provisional estimates of critical C vs. N, and of critical joint-C vs. N and M, at various levels of Pr(type-I error). Application of our proposed methodology requires only MS Excel (2003 or later); we provide Excel XLS and XLSX templates that afford semi-automatic computation for systems involving up to M = 5 response types, each represented by up to N = 1000 observed-and-modeled result pairs. N need not be equal, nor response pairs in complete overlap, over M.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2018; v1 submitted 22 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
