-
Analysis Facilities White Paper
Authors:
D. Ciangottini,
A. Forti,
L. Heinrich,
N. Skidmore,
C. Alpigiani,
M. Aly,
D. Benjamin,
B. Bockelman,
L. Bryant,
J. Catmore,
M. D'Alfonso,
A. Delgado Peris,
C. Doglioni,
G. Duckeck,
P. Elmer,
J. Eschle,
M. Feickert,
J. Frost,
R. Gardner,
V. Garonne,
M. Giffels,
J. Gooding,
E. Gramstad,
L. Gray,
B. Hegner
, et al. (41 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This white paper presents the current status of the R&D for Analysis Facilities (AFs) and attempts to summarize the views on the future direction of these facilities. These views have been collected through the High Energy Physics (HEP) Software Foundation's (HSF) Analysis Facilities forum, established in March 2022, the Analysis Ecosystems II workshop, that took place in May 2022, and the WLCG/HS…
▽ More
This white paper presents the current status of the R&D for Analysis Facilities (AFs) and attempts to summarize the views on the future direction of these facilities. These views have been collected through the High Energy Physics (HEP) Software Foundation's (HSF) Analysis Facilities forum, established in March 2022, the Analysis Ecosystems II workshop, that took place in May 2022, and the WLCG/HSF pre-CHEP workshop, that took place in May 2023. The paper attempts to cover all the aspects of an analysis facility.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2024; v1 submitted 2 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Rucio - Scientific data management
Authors:
Martin Barisits,
Thomas Beermann,
Frank Berghaus,
Brian Bockelman,
Joaquin Bogado,
David Cameron,
Dimitrios Christidis,
Diego Ciangottini,
Gancho Dimitrov,
Markus Elsing,
Vincent Garonne,
Alessandro di Girolamo,
Luc Goossens,
Wen Guan,
Jaroslav Guenther,
Tomas Javurek,
Dietmar Kuhn,
Mario Lassnig,
Fernando Lopez,
Nicolo Magini,
Angelos Molfetas,
Armin Nairz,
Farid Ould-Saada,
Stefan Prenner,
Cedric Serfon
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Rucio is an open-source software framework that provides scientific collaborations with the functionality to organize, manage, and access their data at scale. The data can be distributed across heterogeneous data centers at widely distributed locations. Rucio was originally developed to meet the requirements of the high-energy physics experiment ATLAS, and now is continuously extended to support t…
▽ More
Rucio is an open-source software framework that provides scientific collaborations with the functionality to organize, manage, and access their data at scale. The data can be distributed across heterogeneous data centers at widely distributed locations. Rucio was originally developed to meet the requirements of the high-energy physics experiment ATLAS, and now is continuously extended to support the LHC experiments and other diverse scientific communities. In this article, we detail the fundamental concepts of Rucio, describe the architecture along with implementation details, and give operational experience from production usage.
△ Less
Submitted 6 June, 2019; v1 submitted 26 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group -- Data Organization, Management and Access (DOMA)
Authors:
Dario Berzano,
Riccardo Maria Bianchi,
Ian Bird,
Brian Bockelman,
Simone Campana,
Kaushik De,
Dirk Duellmann,
Peter Elmer,
Robert Gardner,
Vincent Garonne,
Claudio Grandi,
Oliver Gutsche,
Andrew Hanushevsky,
Burt Holzman,
Bodhitha Jayatilaka,
Ivo Jimenez,
Michel Jouvin,
Oliver Keeble,
Alexei Klimentov,
Valentin Kuznetsov,
Eric Lancon,
Mario Lassnig,
Miron Livny,
Carlos Maltzahn,
Shawn McKee
, et al. (13 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Without significant changes to data organization, management, and access (DOMA), HEP experiments will find scientific output limited by how fast data can be accessed and digested by computational resources. In this white paper we discuss challenges in DOMA that HEP experiments, such as the HL-LHC, will face as well as potential ways to address them. A research and development timeline to assess th…
▽ More
Without significant changes to data organization, management, and access (DOMA), HEP experiments will find scientific output limited by how fast data can be accessed and digested by computational resources. In this white paper we discuss challenges in DOMA that HEP experiments, such as the HL-LHC, will face as well as potential ways to address them. A research and development timeline to assess these changes is also proposed.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
A Roadmap for HEP Software and Computing R&D for the 2020s
Authors:
Johannes Albrecht,
Antonio Augusto Alves Jr,
Guilherme Amadio,
Giuseppe Andronico,
Nguyen Anh-Ky,
Laurent Aphecetche,
John Apostolakis,
Makoto Asai,
Luca Atzori,
Marian Babik,
Giuseppe Bagliesi,
Marilena Bandieramonte,
Sunanda Banerjee,
Martin Barisits,
Lothar A. T. Bauerdick,
Stefano Belforte,
Douglas Benjamin,
Catrin Bernius,
Wahid Bhimji,
Riccardo Maria Bianchi,
Ian Bird,
Catherine Biscarat,
Jakob Blomer,
Kenneth Bloom,
Tommaso Boccali
, et al. (285 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Particle physics has an ambitious and broad experimental programme for the coming decades. This programme requires large investments in detector hardware, either to build new facilities and experiments, or to upgrade existing ones. Similarly, it requires commensurate investment in the R&D of software to acquire, manage, process, and analyse the shear amounts of data to be recorded. In planning for…
▽ More
Particle physics has an ambitious and broad experimental programme for the coming decades. This programme requires large investments in detector hardware, either to build new facilities and experiments, or to upgrade existing ones. Similarly, it requires commensurate investment in the R&D of software to acquire, manage, process, and analyse the shear amounts of data to be recorded. In planning for the HL-LHC in particular, it is critical that all of the collaborating stakeholders agree on the software goals and priorities, and that the efforts complement each other. In this spirit, this white paper describes the R&D activities required to prepare for this software upgrade.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2018; v1 submitted 18 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
Expected Performance of the ATLAS Experiment - Detector, Trigger and Physics
Authors:
The ATLAS Collaboration,
G. Aad,
E. Abat,
B. Abbott,
J. Abdallah,
A. A. Abdelalim,
A. Abdesselam,
O. Abdinov,
B. Abi,
M. Abolins,
H. Abramowicz,
B. S. Acharya,
D. L. Adams,
T. N. Addy,
C. Adorisio,
P. Adragna,
T. Adye,
J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,
M. Aharrouche,
S. P. Ahlen,
F. Ahles,
A. Ahmad,
H. Ahmed,
G. Aielli,
T. Akdogan
, et al. (2587 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A detailed study is presented of the expected performance of the ATLAS detector. The reconstruction of tracks, leptons, photons, missing energy and jets is investigated, together with the performance of b-tagging and the trigger. The physics potential for a variety of interesting physics processes, within the Standard Model and beyond, is examined. The study comprises a series of notes based on…
▽ More
A detailed study is presented of the expected performance of the ATLAS detector. The reconstruction of tracks, leptons, photons, missing energy and jets is investigated, together with the performance of b-tagging and the trigger. The physics potential for a variety of interesting physics processes, within the Standard Model and beyond, is examined. The study comprises a series of notes based on simulations of the detector and physics processes, with particular emphasis given to the data expected from the first years of operation of the LHC at CERN.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2009; v1 submitted 28 December, 2008;
originally announced January 2009.
-
DIRAC - Distributed Infrastructure with Remote Agent Control
Authors:
N. Brook,
A. Bogdanchikov,
A. Buckley,
J. Closier,
U. Egede,
M. Frank,
D. Galli,
M. Gandelman,
V. Garonne,
C. Gaspar,
R. Graciani Diaz,
K. Harrison,
E. van Herwijnen,
A. Khan,
S. Klous,
I. Korolko,
G. Kuznetsov,
F. Loverre,
U. Marconi,
J. P. Palacios,
G. N. Patrick,
A. Pickford,
S. Ponce,
V. Romanovski,
J. J. Saborido
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper describes DIRAC, the LHCb Monte Carlo production system. DIRAC has a client/server architecture based on: Compute elements distributed among the collaborating institutes; Databases for production management, bookkee** (the metadata catalogue) and software configuration; Monitoring and cataloguing services for updating and accessing the databases. Locally installed software agents im…
▽ More
This paper describes DIRAC, the LHCb Monte Carlo production system. DIRAC has a client/server architecture based on: Compute elements distributed among the collaborating institutes; Databases for production management, bookkee** (the metadata catalogue) and software configuration; Monitoring and cataloguing services for updating and accessing the databases. Locally installed software agents implemented in Python monitor the local batch queue, interrogate the production database for any outstanding production requests using the XML-RPC protocol and initiate the job submission. The agent checks and, if necessary, installs any required software automatically. After the job has processed the events, the agent transfers the output data and updates the metadata catalogue. DIRAC has been successfully installed at 18 collaborating institutes, including the DataGRID, and has been used in recent Physics Data Challenges. In the near to medium term future we must use a mixed environment with different types of grid middleware or no middleware. We describe how this flexibility has been achieved and how ubiquitously available grid middleware would improve DIRAC.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2003;
originally announced June 2003.
-
HEP Applications Evaluation of the EDG Testbed and Middleware
Authors:
I. Augustin,
F. Carminati,
J. Closier,
E. van Herwijnen,
J. J. Blaising,
D. Boutigny,
C. Charlot,
V. Garonne,
A. Tsaregorodtsev,
K. Bos,
J. Templon,
P. Capiluppi,
A. Fanfani,
R. Barbera,
G. Negri,
L. Perini,
S. Resconi,
M. Sitta,
M. Reale,
D. Vicinanza,
S. Bagnasco,
P. Cerello,
A. Sciaba,
O. Smirnova,
D. Colling
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Workpackage 8 of the European Datagrid project was formed in January 2001 with representatives from the four LHC experiments, and with experiment independent people from five of the six main EDG partners. In September 2002 WP8 was strengthened by the addition of effort from BaBar and D0. The original mandate of WP8 was, following the definition of short- and long-term requirements, to port exper…
▽ More
Workpackage 8 of the European Datagrid project was formed in January 2001 with representatives from the four LHC experiments, and with experiment independent people from five of the six main EDG partners. In September 2002 WP8 was strengthened by the addition of effort from BaBar and D0. The original mandate of WP8 was, following the definition of short- and long-term requirements, to port experiment software to the EDG middleware and testbed environment. A major additional activity has been testing the basic functionality and performance of this environment. This paper reviews experiences and evaluations in the areas of job submission, data management, mass storage handling, information systems and monitoring. It also comments on the problems of remote debugging, the portability of code, and scaling problems with increasing numbers of jobs, sites and nodes. Reference is made to the pioneeering work of Atlas and CMS in integrating the use of the EDG Testbed into their data challenges. A forward look is made to essential software developments within EDG and to the necessary cooperation between EDG and LCG for the LCG prototype due in mid 2003.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2003;
originally announced June 2003.
