-
Local majority-with-inertia rule can explain global consensus dynamics in a network coordination game
Authors:
Felix Gaisbauer,
Ariana Strandburg-Peshkin,
Helge Giese
Abstract:
We study how groups reach consensus by varying communication network structure and individual incentives. In 342 networks of seven individuals, single opinionated "leaders" can drive decision outcomes, but do not accelerate consensus formation, whereas conflicting opinions slow consensus. While networks with more links reach consensus faster, this advantage disappears under conflict. Unopinionated…
▽ More
We study how groups reach consensus by varying communication network structure and individual incentives. In 342 networks of seven individuals, single opinionated "leaders" can drive decision outcomes, but do not accelerate consensus formation, whereas conflicting opinions slow consensus. While networks with more links reach consensus faster, this advantage disappears under conflict. Unopinionated individuals make choices consistent with a local majority rule combined with "inertia" favouring their previous choice, while opinionated individuals favour their preferred option but yield under high peer or time pressure. Simulations show these individual rules can account for group patterns, and allow rapid consensus while preventing deadlocks.
△ Less
Submitted 7 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Grounding force-directed network layouts with latent space models
Authors:
Felix Gaisbauer,
Armin Pournaki,
Sven Banisch,
Eckehard Olbrich
Abstract:
Force-directed layout algorithms are ubiquitously-used tools for network visualisation across a multitude of scientific disciplines. However, they lack theoretical grounding which allows to interpret their outcomes rigorously and can guide the choice of specific algorithms for certain data sets. We propose an approach building on latent space models, which assume that the probability of nodes form…
▽ More
Force-directed layout algorithms are ubiquitously-used tools for network visualisation across a multitude of scientific disciplines. However, they lack theoretical grounding which allows to interpret their outcomes rigorously and can guide the choice of specific algorithms for certain data sets. We propose an approach building on latent space models, which assume that the probability of nodes forming a tie depends on their distance in an unobserved latent space. From such latent space models, we derive force equations for a force-directed layout algorithm. Since the forces infer positions which maximise the likelihood of the given network under the latent space model, the force-directed layout becomes interpretable. We implement these forces for unweighted and weighted networks and spatialise different real-world networks. Comparison to existing layout algorithms (not grounded in an interpretable model) reveals that node groups are placed in similar configurations, while said algorithms show a stronger intra-cluster separation of nodes, as well as a tendency to separate clusters more strongly in retweet networks. We also explore the possibility of visualising data traditionally not seen as network data, such as survey data.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2022; v1 submitted 22 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Ideological differences in engagement in public debate on Twitter
Authors:
Felix Gaisbauer,
Armin Pournaki,
Sven Banisch,
Eckehard Olbrich
Abstract:
This article analyses public debate on Twitter via network representations of retweets and replies. We argue that tweets observable on Twitter have both a direct and mediated effect on the perception of public opinion. Through the interplay of the two networks, it is possible to identify potentially misleading representations of public opinion on the platform. The method is employed to observe pub…
▽ More
This article analyses public debate on Twitter via network representations of retweets and replies. We argue that tweets observable on Twitter have both a direct and mediated effect on the perception of public opinion. Through the interplay of the two networks, it is possible to identify potentially misleading representations of public opinion on the platform. The method is employed to observe public debate about two events: The Saxon state elections and violent riots in the city of Leipzig in 2019. We show that in both cases, (i) different opinion groups exhibit different propensities to get involved in debate, and therefore have unequal impact on public opinion. Users retweeting far-right parties and politicians are significantly more active, hence their positions are disproportionately visible. (ii) Said users act significantly more confrontational in the sense that they reply mostly to users from different groups, while the contrary is not the case.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2021; v1 submitted 3 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
How social feedback processing in the brain shapes collective opinion processes in the era of social media
Authors:
Sven Banisch,
Felix Gaisbauer,
Eckehard Olbrich
Abstract:
What are the mechanisms by which groups with certain opinions gain public voice and force others holding a different view into silence? And how does social media play into this? Drawing on recent neuro-scientific insights into the processing of social feedback, we develop a theoretical model that allows to address these questions. The model captures phenomena described by spiral of silence theory…
▽ More
What are the mechanisms by which groups with certain opinions gain public voice and force others holding a different view into silence? And how does social media play into this? Drawing on recent neuro-scientific insights into the processing of social feedback, we develop a theoretical model that allows to address these questions. The model captures phenomena described by spiral of silence theory of public opinion, provides a mechanism-based foundation for it, and allows in this way more general insight into how different group structures relate to different regimes of collective opinion expression. Even strong majorities can be forced into silence if a minority acts as a cohesive whole. The proposed framework of social feedback theory (SFT) highlights the need for sociological theorising to understand the societal-level implications of findings in social and cognitive neuroscience.
△ Less
Submitted 18 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
The Twitter Explorer: a Framework for Observing Twitter through Interactive Networks
Authors:
Armin Pournaki,
Felix Gaisbauer,
Sven Banisch,
Eckehard Olbrich
Abstract:
We present an open-source interface for scientists to explore Twitter data through interactive network visualizations. Combining data collection, transformation and visualization in one easily accessible framework, the twitter explorer connects distant and close reading of Twitter data through the interactive exploration of interaction networks and semantic networks. By lowering the technological…
▽ More
We present an open-source interface for scientists to explore Twitter data through interactive network visualizations. Combining data collection, transformation and visualization in one easily accessible framework, the twitter explorer connects distant and close reading of Twitter data through the interactive exploration of interaction networks and semantic networks. By lowering the technological barriers of data-driven research, it aims to attract researchers from various disciplinary backgrounds and facilitates new perspectives in the thriving field of computational social science.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2021; v1 submitted 7 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
The dynamics of opinion expression
Authors:
Felix Gaisbauer,
Eckehard Olbrich,
Sven Banisch
Abstract:
Modelling efforts in opinion dynamics have to a large extent ignored that opinion exchange between individuals can also have an effect on how willing they are to express their opinion publicly. Here, we introduce a model of public opinion expression. Two groups of agents with different opinion on an issue interact with each other, changing the willingness to express their opinion according to whet…
▽ More
Modelling efforts in opinion dynamics have to a large extent ignored that opinion exchange between individuals can also have an effect on how willing they are to express their opinion publicly. Here, we introduce a model of public opinion expression. Two groups of agents with different opinion on an issue interact with each other, changing the willingness to express their opinion according to whether they perceive themselves as part of the majority or minority opinion. We formulate the model as a multi-group majority game and investigate the Nash equilibria. We also provide a dynamical systems perspective: Using the reinforcement learning algorithm of $Q$-learning, we reduce the $N$-agent system in a mean-field approach to two dimensions which represent the two opinion groups. This two-dimensional system is analyzed in a comprehensive bifurcation analysis of its parameters. The model identifies social-structural conditions for public opinion predominance of different groups. Among other findings, we show under which circumstances a minority can dominate public discourse.
△ Less
Submitted 5 February, 2020; v1 submitted 29 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
