Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Gaevoy, N
-
Hard satisfiable formulas for DPLL algorithms using heuristics with small memory
Authors:
Nikita Gaevoy
Abstract:
DPLL algorithm for solving the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) can be represented in the form of a procedure that, using heuristics $A$ and $B$, select the variable $x$ from the input formula $\varphi$ and the value $b$ and runs recursively on the formulas $\varphi[x := b]$ and $\varphi[x := 1 - b]$. Exponential lower bounds on the running time of DPLL algorithms on unsatisfiable formulas fol…
▽ More
DPLL algorithm for solving the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) can be represented in the form of a procedure that, using heuristics $A$ and $B$, select the variable $x$ from the input formula $\varphi$ and the value $b$ and runs recursively on the formulas $\varphi[x := b]$ and $\varphi[x := 1 - b]$. Exponential lower bounds on the running time of DPLL algorithms on unsatisfiable formulas follow from the lower bounds for tree-like resolution proofs. Lower bounds on satisfiable formulas are also known for some classes of DPLL algorithms such as "myopic" and "drunken" algorithms.
All lower bounds are made for the classes of DPLL algorithms that limit heuristics access to the formula. In this paper we consider DPLL algorithms with heuristics that have unlimited access to the formula but use small memory. We show that for any pair of heuristics with small memory there exists a family of satisfiable formulas $Φ_n$ such that a DPLL algorithm that uses these heuristics runs in exponential time on the formulas $Φ_n$.
△ Less
Submitted 23 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
New Competitiveness Bounds for the Shared Memory Switch
Authors:
Ivan Bochkov,
Alex Davydow,
Nikita Gaevoy,
Sergey I. Nikolenko
Abstract:
We consider one of the simplest and best known buffer management architectures: the shared memory switch with multiple output queues and uniform packets. It was one of the first models studied by competitive analysis, with the Longest Queue Drop (LQD) buffer management policy shown to be at least $\sqrt{2}$- and at most $2$-competitive; a general lower bound of $4/3$ has been proven for all determ…
▽ More
We consider one of the simplest and best known buffer management architectures: the shared memory switch with multiple output queues and uniform packets. It was one of the first models studied by competitive analysis, with the Longest Queue Drop (LQD) buffer management policy shown to be at least $\sqrt{2}$- and at most $2$-competitive; a general lower bound of $4/3$ has been proven for all deterministic online algorithms. Closing the gap between $\sqrt{2}$ and $2$ has remained an open problem in competitive analysis for more than a decade, with only marginal success in reducing the upper bound of $2$. In this work, we first present a simplified proof for the $\sqrt{2}$ lower bound for LQD and then, using a reduction to the continuous case, improve the general lower bound for all deterministic online algorithms from $\frac 43$ to $\sqrt{2}$. Then, we proceed to improve the lower bound of $\sqrt{2}$ specifically for LQD, showing that LQD is at least $1.44546086$-competitive. We are able to prove the bound by presenting an explicit construction of the optimal clairvoyant algorithm which then allows for two different ways to prove lower bounds: by direct computer simulations and by proving lower bounds via linear programming. The linear programming approach yields a lower bound for LQD of $1.4427902$ (still larger than $\sqrt{2}$).
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
