Testing analytical methods to derive the cosmic-ray ionisation rate in cold regions via synthetic observations
Authors:
E. Redaelli,
S. Bovino,
A. Lupi,
T. Grassi,
D. Gaete-Espinoza,
G. Sabatini,
P. Caselli
Abstract:
Cosmic rays (CRs) heavily impact the chemistry and physics of cold and dense star-forming regions. However, characterising their ionisation rate is still challenging from an observational point of view. In the past, a few analytical formulas have been proposed to infer the cosmic-ray ionization rate $ζ_2$ from molecular line observations. These have been derived from the chemical kinetics of the i…
▽ More
Cosmic rays (CRs) heavily impact the chemistry and physics of cold and dense star-forming regions. However, characterising their ionisation rate is still challenging from an observational point of view. In the past, a few analytical formulas have been proposed to infer the cosmic-ray ionization rate $ζ_2$ from molecular line observations. These have been derived from the chemical kinetics of the involved species, but they have not been validated using synthetic data processed with a standard observative pipeline. We aim to bridge this gap. We perform the radiative transfer on a set of three-dimensional magneto-hydrodynamical simulations of prestellar cores, exploring different initial $ζ_2$, evolutionary stages, types of radiative transfer (e.g. assuming local-thermodynamic-equilibrium conditions), and telescope responses. We then compute the column densities of the involved tracers to determine $ζ_2$, using, in particular, the equation proposed by Bovino et. al (2020) and by Caselli et al. (1998) both used nowadays. Our results confirm that the method of Bovino et al. (2020) accurately retrieves the actual $ζ_2$ within a factor of $2-3$, in the physical conditions explored in our tests. Since we also explore a non-local thermodynamic equilibrium radiative transfer, this work indirectly offers insights into the excitation temperatures of common transitions at moderate volume densities ($n\approx 10^5 \, \rm cm^{-3}$). We have also performed a few tests using the formula proposed by Caselli et al. (1998), which overestimates the actual $ζ_2$ by at least two orders of magnitudes. We also consider a new derivation of this method, which, however, still leads to large overestimates.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
