The Linked Data Benchmark Council (LDBC): Driving competition and collaboration in the graph data management space
Authors:
Gábor Szárnyas,
Brad Bebee,
Altan Birler,
Alin Deutsch,
George Fletcher,
Henry A. Gabb,
Denise Gosnell,
Alastair Green,
Zhihui Guo,
Keith W. Hare,
Jan Hidders,
Alexandru Iosup,
Atanas Kiryakov,
Tomas Kovatchev,
Xinsheng Li,
Leonid Libkin,
Heng Lin,
Xiaojian Luo,
Arnau Prat-Pérez,
David Püroja,
Shipeng Qi,
Oskar van Rest,
Benjamin A. Steer,
Dávid Szakállas,
Bing Tong
, et al. (8 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Graph data management is instrumental for several use cases such as recommendation, root cause analysis, financial fraud detection, and enterprise knowledge representation. Efficiently supporting these use cases yields a number of unique requirements, including the need for a concise query language and graph-aware query optimization techniques. The goal of the Linked Data Benchmark Council (LDBC)…
▽ More
Graph data management is instrumental for several use cases such as recommendation, root cause analysis, financial fraud detection, and enterprise knowledge representation. Efficiently supporting these use cases yields a number of unique requirements, including the need for a concise query language and graph-aware query optimization techniques. The goal of the Linked Data Benchmark Council (LDBC) is to design a set of standard benchmarks that capture representative categories of graph data management problems, making the performance of systems comparable and facilitating competition among vendors. LDBC also conducts research on graph schemas and graph query languages. This paper introduces the LDBC organization and its work over the last decade.
△ Less
Submitted 17 August, 2023; v1 submitted 10 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
A high-throughput analysis of ovarian cycle disruption by mixtures of aromatase inhibitors
Authors:
Frederic Y. Bois,
Nazanin Golbamaki-Bakhtyari,
Simona Kovarich,
Cleo Tebby,
Henry A. Gabb,
Emmanuel Lemazurier
Abstract:
Background: Combining computational toxicology with ExpoCast exposure estimates and ToxCast assay data gives us access to predictions of human health risks stemming from exposures to chemical mixtures.
Objectives: To explore, through mathematical modeling and simulations, the size of potential effects of random mixtures of aromatase inhibitors on the dynamics of women's menstrual cycles.
Metho…
▽ More
Background: Combining computational toxicology with ExpoCast exposure estimates and ToxCast assay data gives us access to predictions of human health risks stemming from exposures to chemical mixtures.
Objectives: To explore, through mathematical modeling and simulations, the size of potential effects of random mixtures of aromatase inhibitors on the dynamics of women's menstrual cycles.
Methods: We simulated random exposures to millions of potential mixtures of 86 aromatase inhibitors. A pharmacokinetic model of intake and disposition of the chemicals predicted their internal concentration as a function of time (up to two years). A ToxCast aromatase assay provided concentration-inhibition relationships for each chemical. The resulting total aromatase inhibition was input to a mathematical model of the hormonal hypothalamus-pituitary-ovarian control of ovulation in women.
Results: Above 10% inhibition of estradiol synthesis by aromatase inhibitors, noticeable (eventually reversible) effects on ovulation were predicted. Exposures to individual chemicals never led to such effects. In our best estimate, about 10% of the combined exposures simulated had mild to catastrophic impacts on ovulation. A lower bound on that figure, obtained using an optimistic exposure scenario, was 0.3%.
Conclusions: These results demonstrate the possibility to predict large-scale mixture effects for endocrine disrupters with a predictive toxicology approach, suitable for high-throughput ranking and risk assessment. The size of the effects predicted is consistent with an increased risk of infertility in women from everyday exposures to our chemical environment.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2017; v1 submitted 13 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
