-
The response of small SQUID pickup loops to magnetic fields
Authors:
John R. Kirtley,
Lisa Paulius,
Aaron J. Rosenberg,
Johanna C. Palmstrom,
Daniel Schiessl,
Colin L. Jermain,
Jonathan Gibbons,
Connor M. Holland,
Y. -K. -K. Fung,
Martin E. Huber,
Mark B. Ketchen,
Daniel C. Ralph,
Gerald W. Gisbon, Jr.,
Katrhyn A. Moler
Abstract:
In the past, magnetic images acquired using scanning Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) microscopy have been interpreted using simple models for the sensor point spread function. However, more complicated modeling is needed when the characteristic dimensions of the field sensitive areas in these sensors become comparable to the London penetration depth. In this paper we calculate…
▽ More
In the past, magnetic images acquired using scanning Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) microscopy have been interpreted using simple models for the sensor point spread function. However, more complicated modeling is needed when the characteristic dimensions of the field sensitive areas in these sensors become comparable to the London penetration depth. In this paper we calculate the response of SQUIDs with deep sub-micron pickup loops to different sources of magnetic fields by solving coupled London's and Maxwell's equations using the full sensor geometry. Tests of these calculations using various field sources are in reasonable agreement with experiments. These calculations allow us to more accurately interpret sub-micron spatial resolution data obtained using scanning SQUID microscopy.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2016;
originally announced July 2016.
-
Scanning SQUID susceptometers with sub-micron spatial resolution
Authors:
John R. Kirtley,
Lisa Paulius,
Aaron J. Rosenberg,
Johanna C. Palmstrom,
Connor M. Holland,
Eric M. Spanton,
Daniel Schiessl,
Colin L. Jermain,
Jonathan Gibbons,
Y. -K. -K. Fung,
Martin E. Huber,
Daniel C. Ralph,
Mark B. Ketchen,
Gerald W. Gibson Jr.,
Kathryn A. Moler
Abstract:
Superconducting QUantum Interference Device (SQUID) microscopy has excellent magnetic field sensitivity, but suffers from modest spatial resolution when compared with other scanning probes. This spatial resolution is determined by both the size of the field sensitive area and the spacing between this area and the sample surface. In this paper we describe scanning SQUID susceptometers that achieve…
▽ More
Superconducting QUantum Interference Device (SQUID) microscopy has excellent magnetic field sensitivity, but suffers from modest spatial resolution when compared with other scanning probes. This spatial resolution is determined by both the size of the field sensitive area and the spacing between this area and the sample surface. In this paper we describe scanning SQUID susceptometers that achieve sub-micron spatial resolution while retaining a white noise floor flux sensitivity of $\approx 2μΦ_0/Hz^{1/2}$. This high spatial resolution is accomplished by deep sub-micron feature sizes, well shielded pickup loops fabricated using a planarized process, and a deep etch step that minimizes the spacing between the sample surface and the SQUID pickup loop. We describe the design, modeling, fabrication, and testing of these sensors. Although sub-micron spatial resolution has been achieved previously in scanning SQUID sensors, our sensors not only achieve high spatial resolution, but also have integrated modulation coils for flux feedback, integrated field coils for susceptibility measurements, and batch processing. They are therefore a generally applicable tool for imaging sample magnetization, currents, and susceptibilities with higher spatial resolution than previous susceptometers.
△ Less
Submitted 25 July, 2016; v1 submitted 30 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
-
Investigating surface loss effects in superconducting transmon qubits
Authors:
J. M. Gambetta,
C. E. Murray,
Y. -K. -K. Fung,
D. T. McClure,
O. Dial,
W. Shanks,
J. Sleight,
M. Steffen
Abstract:
Superconducting qubits are sensitive to a variety of loss mechanisms including dielectric loss from interfaces. By changing the physical footprint of the qubit it is possible to modulate sensitivity to surface loss. Here we show a systematic study of planar superconducting transmons of differing physical footprints to optimize the qubit design for maximum coherence. We find that qubits with small…
▽ More
Superconducting qubits are sensitive to a variety of loss mechanisms including dielectric loss from interfaces. By changing the physical footprint of the qubit it is possible to modulate sensitivity to surface loss. Here we show a systematic study of planar superconducting transmons of differing physical footprints to optimize the qubit design for maximum coherence. We find that qubits with small footprints are limited by surface loss and that qubits with large footprints are limited by other loss mechanisms which are currently not understood.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
