VLST: Virtual Lung Screening Trial for Lung Cancer Detection Using Virtual Imaging Trial
Authors:
Fakrul Islam Tushar,
Liesbeth Vancoillie,
Cindy McCabe,
Amareswararao Kavuri,
Lavsen Dahal,
Brian Harrawood,
Milo Fryling,
Mojtaba Zarei,
Saman Sotoudeh-Paima,
Fong Chi Ho,
Dhrubajyoti Ghosh,
Sheng Luo,
W. Paul Segars,
Ehsan Abadi,
Kyle J. Lafata,
Ehsan Samei,
Joseph Y. Lo
Abstract:
Importance: The efficacy of lung cancer screening can be significantly impacted by the imaging modality used. This Virtual Lung Screening Trial (VLST) addresses the critical need for precision in lung cancer diagnostics and the potential for reducing unnecessary radiation exposure in clinical settings.
Objectives: To establish a virtual imaging trial (VIT) platform that accurately simulates real…
▽ More
Importance: The efficacy of lung cancer screening can be significantly impacted by the imaging modality used. This Virtual Lung Screening Trial (VLST) addresses the critical need for precision in lung cancer diagnostics and the potential for reducing unnecessary radiation exposure in clinical settings.
Objectives: To establish a virtual imaging trial (VIT) platform that accurately simulates real-world lung screening trials (LSTs) to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CT and CXR modalities.
Design, Setting, and Participants: Utilizing computational models and machine learning algorithms, we created a diverse virtual patient population. The cohort, designed to mirror real-world demographics, was assessed using virtual imaging techniques that reflect historical imaging technologies.
Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the difference in the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for CT and CXR modalities across lesion types and sizes.
Results: The study analyzed 298 CT and 313 CXR simulated images from 313 virtual patients, with a lesion-level AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.84) for CT and 0.55 (95% CI: 0.53-0.56) for CXR. At the patient level, CT demonstrated an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.89), compared to 0.53 (95% CI: 0.47-0.60) for CXR. Subgroup analyses indicated CT's superior performance in detecting homogeneous lesions (AUC of 0.97 for lesion-level) and heterogeneous lesions (AUC of 0.71 for lesion-level) as well as in identifying larger nodules (AUC of 0.98 for nodules > 8 mm).
Conclusion and Relevance: The VIT platform validated the superior diagnostic accuracy of CT over CXR, especially for smaller nodules, underscoring its potential to replicate real clinical imaging trials. These findings advocate for the integration of virtual trials in the evaluation and improvement of imaging-based diagnostic tools.
△ Less
Submitted 17 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
