-
Prefix palindromic length of the Sierpinski word
Authors:
Dora V. Bulgakova,
Anna E. Frid,
Jérémy Scanvic
Abstract:
The prefix palindromic length $p_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ of an infinite word $\mathbf{u}$ is the minimal number of concatenated palindromes needed to express the prefix of length $n$ of $\mathbf{u}$. This function is surprisingly difficult to study; in particular, the conjecture that $p_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ can be bounded only if $\mathbf{u}$ is ultimately periodic is open since 2013. A more recent conjectur…
▽ More
The prefix palindromic length $p_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ of an infinite word $\mathbf{u}$ is the minimal number of concatenated palindromes needed to express the prefix of length $n$ of $\mathbf{u}$. This function is surprisingly difficult to study; in particular, the conjecture that $p_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ can be bounded only if $\mathbf{u}$ is ultimately periodic is open since 2013. A more recent conjecture concerns the prefix palindromic length of the period doubling word: it seems that it is not $2$-regular, and if it is true, this would give a rare if not unique example of a non-regular function of a $2$-automatic word.
For some other $k$-automatic words, however, the prefix palindromic length is known to be $k$-regular. Here we add to the list of those words the Sierpinski word $\mathbf{s}$ and give a complete description of $p_{\mathbf{s}}(n)$.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2022; v1 submitted 24 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
On prefix palindromic length of automatic words
Authors:
Anna E. Frid,
Enzo Laborde,
Jarkko Peltomäki
Abstract:
The prefix palindromic length $\mathrm{PPL}_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ of an infinite word $\mathbf{u}$ is the minimal number of concatenated palindromes needed to express the prefix of length $n$ of $\mathbf{u}$. Since 2013, it is still unknown if $\mathrm{PPL}_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ is unbounded for every aperiodic infinite word $\mathbf{u}$, even though this has been proven for almost all aperiodic words. At t…
▽ More
The prefix palindromic length $\mathrm{PPL}_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ of an infinite word $\mathbf{u}$ is the minimal number of concatenated palindromes needed to express the prefix of length $n$ of $\mathbf{u}$. Since 2013, it is still unknown if $\mathrm{PPL}_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ is unbounded for every aperiodic infinite word $\mathbf{u}$, even though this has been proven for almost all aperiodic words. At the same time, the only well-known nontrivial infinite word for which the function $\mathrm{PPL}_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ has been precisely computed is the Thue-Morse word $\mathbf{t}$. This word is $2$-automatic and, predictably, its function $\mathrm{PPL}_{\mathbf{t}}(n)$ is $2$-regular, but is this the case for all automatic words?
In this paper, we prove that this function is $k$-regular for every $k$-automatic word containing only a finite number of palindromes. For two such words, namely the paperfolding word and the Rudin-Shapiro word, we derive a formula for this function. Our computational experiments suggest that generally this is not true: for the period-doubling word, the prefix palindromic length does not look $2$-regular, and for the Fibonacci word, it does not look Fibonacci-regular. If proven, these results would give rare (if not first) examples of a natural function of an automatic word which is not regular.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2021; v1 submitted 7 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Prefix palindromic length of the Thue-Morse word
Authors:
Anna E. Frid
Abstract:
The prefix palindromic length $PPL_u(n)$ of an infinite word $u$ is the minimal number of concatenated palindromes needed to express the prefix of length $n$ of $u$. In a 2013 paper with Puzynina and Zamboni we stated the conjecture that $PPL_u(n)$ is unbounded for every infinite word $u$ which is not ultimately periodic. Up to now, the conjecture has been proven for almost all words, including al…
▽ More
The prefix palindromic length $PPL_u(n)$ of an infinite word $u$ is the minimal number of concatenated palindromes needed to express the prefix of length $n$ of $u$. In a 2013 paper with Puzynina and Zamboni we stated the conjecture that $PPL_u(n)$ is unbounded for every infinite word $u$ which is not ultimately periodic. Up to now, the conjecture has been proven for almost all words, including all words avoiding some power $p$. However, even in that simple case the existing upper bound for the minimal number $n$ such that $PPL_u(n)>K$ is greater than any constant to the power $K$. Precise values of $PPL_u(n)$ are not known even for simplest examples like the Fibonacci word.
In this paper, we give the first example of such a precise computation and compute the function of the prefix palindromic length of the Thue-Morse word, a famous test object for all functions on infinite words. It happens that this sequence is $2$-regular, which raises the question if this fact can be generalized to all automatic sequences.
△ Less
Submitted 28 August, 2019; v1 submitted 22 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Morphic words and equidistributed sequences
Authors:
Mélodie Andrieu,
Anna E. Frid
Abstract:
The problem we consider is the following: Given an infinite word $w$ on an ordered alphabet, construct the sequence $ν_w=(ν[n])_n$, equidistributed on $[0,1]$ and such that $ν[m]<ν[n]$ if and only if $σ^m(w)<σ^n(w)$, where $σ$ is the shift operation, erasing the first symbol of $w$. The sequence $ν_w$ exists and is unique for every word with well-defined positive uniform frequencies of every facto…
▽ More
The problem we consider is the following: Given an infinite word $w$ on an ordered alphabet, construct the sequence $ν_w=(ν[n])_n$, equidistributed on $[0,1]$ and such that $ν[m]<ν[n]$ if and only if $σ^m(w)<σ^n(w)$, where $σ$ is the shift operation, erasing the first symbol of $w$. The sequence $ν_w$ exists and is unique for every word with well-defined positive uniform frequencies of every factor, or, in dynamical terms, for every element of a uniquely ergodic subshift. In this paper we describe the construction of $ν_w$ for the case when the subshift of $w$ is generated by a morphism of a special kind; then we overcome some technical difficulties to extend the result to all binary morphisms. The sequence $ν_w$ in this case is also constructed with a morphism.
At last, we introduce a software tool which, given a binary morphism $\varphi$, computes the morphism on extended intervals and first elements of the equidistributed sequences associated with fixed points of $\varphi$.
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2019; v1 submitted 22 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
The number of valid factorizations of Fibonacci prefixes
Authors:
Pierre Bonardo,
Anna E. Frid,
Jeffrey Shallit
Abstract:
We establish several recurrence relations and an explicit formula for V(n), the number of factorizations of the length-n prefix of the Fibonacci word into a (not necessarily strictly) decreasing sequence of standard Fibonacci words. In particular, we show that the sequence V(n) is the shuffle of the ceilings of two linear functions of n.
We establish several recurrence relations and an explicit formula for V(n), the number of factorizations of the length-n prefix of the Fibonacci word into a (not necessarily strictly) decreasing sequence of standard Fibonacci words. In particular, we show that the sequence V(n) is the shuffle of the ceilings of two linear functions of n.
△ Less
Submitted 7 January, 2019; v1 submitted 25 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Proceedings of eNTERFACE 2015 Workshop on Intelligent Interfaces
Authors:
Matei Mancas,
Christian Frisson,
Joëlle Tilmanne,
Nicolas d'Alessandro,
Petr Barborka,
Furkan Bayansar,
Francisco Bernard,
Rebecca Fiebrink,
Alexis Heloir,
Edgar Hemery,
Sohaib Laraba,
Alexis Moinet,
Fabrizio Nunnari,
Thierry Ravet,
Loïc Reboursière,
Alvaro Sarasua,
Mickaël Tits,
Noé Tits,
François Zajéga,
Paolo Alborno,
Ksenia Kolykhalova,
Emma Frid,
Damiano Malafronte,
Lisanne Huis in't Veld,
Hüseyin Cakmak
, et al. (49 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The 11th Summer Workshop on Multimodal Interfaces eNTERFACE 2015 was hosted by the Numediart Institute of Creative Technologies of the University of Mons from August 10th to September 2015. During the four weeks, students and researchers from all over the world came together in the Numediart Institute of the University of Mons to work on eight selected projects structured around intelligent interf…
▽ More
The 11th Summer Workshop on Multimodal Interfaces eNTERFACE 2015 was hosted by the Numediart Institute of Creative Technologies of the University of Mons from August 10th to September 2015. During the four weeks, students and researchers from all over the world came together in the Numediart Institute of the University of Mons to work on eight selected projects structured around intelligent interfaces. Eight projects were selected and their reports are shown here.
△ Less
Submitted 19 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
Cost and dimension of words of zero topological entropy
Authors:
Julien Cassaigne,
Anna E. Frid,
Svetlana Puzynina,
Luca Q. Zamboni
Abstract:
Let $A^*$ denote the free monoid generated by a finite nonempty set $A.$ In this paper we introduce a new measure of complexity of languages $L\subseteq A^*$ defined in terms of the semigroup structure on $A^*.$ For each $L\subseteq A^*,$ we define its {\it cost} $c(L)$ as the infimum of all real numbers $α$ for which there exist a language $S\subseteq A^*$ with $p_S(n)=O(n^α)$ and a positive inte…
▽ More
Let $A^*$ denote the free monoid generated by a finite nonempty set $A.$ In this paper we introduce a new measure of complexity of languages $L\subseteq A^*$ defined in terms of the semigroup structure on $A^*.$ For each $L\subseteq A^*,$ we define its {\it cost} $c(L)$ as the infimum of all real numbers $α$ for which there exist a language $S\subseteq A^*$ with $p_S(n)=O(n^α)$ and a positive integer $k$ with $L\subseteq S^k.$ We also define the {\it cost dimension} $d_c(L)$ as the infimum of the set of all positive integers $k$ such that $L\subseteq S^k$ for some language $S$ with $p_S(n)=O(n^{c(L)}).$ We are primarily interested in languages $L$ given by the set of factors of an infinite word $x=x_0x_1x_2\cdots \in A^ω$ of zero topological entropy, in which case $c(L)<+\infty.$ We establish the following characterisation of words of linear factor complexity: Let $x\in A^ω$ and $L=$Fac$(x)$ be the set of factors of $x.$ Then $p_x(n)=Θ(n)$ if and only $c(L)=0$ and $d_c(L)=2.$ In other words, $p_x(n)=O(n)$ if and only if Fac$(x)\subseteq S^2$ for some language $S\subseteq A^+$ of bounded complexity (meaning $\limsup p_S(n)<+\infty).$ In general the cost of a language $L$ reflects deeply the underlying combinatorial structure induced by the semigroup structure on $A^*.$ For example, in contrast to the above characterisation of languages generated by words of sub-linear complexity, there exist non factorial languages $L$ of complexity $p_L(n)=O(\log n)$ (and hence of cost equal to $0)$ and of cost dimension $+\infty.$ In this paper we investigate the cost and cost dimension of languages defined by infinite words of zero topological entropy.
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2016;
originally announced July 2016.
-
Words containing all permutations of a family of factors
Authors:
Anna E. Frid
Abstract:
We prove that if a uniformly recurrent infinite word contains as a factor any finite permutation of words from an infinite family, then either this word is periodic, or its complexity (that is, the number of factors) grows faster than linearly. This result generalizes one of the lemmas of a recent paper by de Luca and Zamboni, where it was proved that such an infinite word cannot be Sturmian.
We prove that if a uniformly recurrent infinite word contains as a factor any finite permutation of words from an infinite family, then either this word is periodic, or its complexity (that is, the number of factors) grows faster than linearly. This result generalizes one of the lemmas of a recent paper by de Luca and Zamboni, where it was proved that such an infinite word cannot be Sturmian.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
-
Minimal complexity of equidistributed infinite permutations
Authors:
Sergey V. Avgustinovich,
Anna E. Frid,
Svetlana Puzynina
Abstract:
An infinite permutation is a linear ordering of the set of natural numbers. An infinite permutation can be defined by a sequence of real numbers where only the order of elements is taken into account. In the paper we investigate a new class of {\it equidistributed} infinite permutations, that is, infinite permutations which can be defined by equidistributed sequences. Similarly to infinite words,…
▽ More
An infinite permutation is a linear ordering of the set of natural numbers. An infinite permutation can be defined by a sequence of real numbers where only the order of elements is taken into account. In the paper we investigate a new class of {\it equidistributed} infinite permutations, that is, infinite permutations which can be defined by equidistributed sequences. Similarly to infinite words, a complexity $p(n)$ of an infinite permutation is defined as a function counting the number of its subpermutations of length $n$. For infinite words, a classical result of Morse and Hedlund, 1938, states that if the complexity of an infinite word satisfies $p(n) \leq n$ for some $n$, then the word is ultimately periodic. Hence minimal complexity of aperiodic words is equal to $n+1$, and words with such complexity are called Sturmian. For infinite permutations this does not hold: There exist aperiodic permutations with complexity functions growing arbitrarily slowly, and hence there are no permutations of minimal complexity. We show that, unlike for permutations in general, the minimal complexity of an equidistributed permutation $α$ is $p_α(n)=n$. The class of equidistributed permutations of minimal complexity coincides with the class of so-called Sturmian permutations, directly related to Sturmian words.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2016; v1 submitted 20 March, 2015;
originally announced March 2015.
-
Subword complexity and decomposition of the set of factors
Authors:
J. Cassaigne,
A. E. Frid,
S. Puzynina,
L. Q. Zamboni
Abstract:
In this paper we explore a new hierarchy of classes of languages and infinite words and its connection with complexity classes. Namely, we say that a language belongs to the class $L_k$ if it is a subset of the catenation of $k$ languages $S_1\cdots S_k$, where the number of words of length $n$ in each of $S_i$ is bounded by a constant. The class of infinite words whose set of factors is in $L_k$…
▽ More
In this paper we explore a new hierarchy of classes of languages and infinite words and its connection with complexity classes. Namely, we say that a language belongs to the class $L_k$ if it is a subset of the catenation of $k$ languages $S_1\cdots S_k$, where the number of words of length $n$ in each of $S_i$ is bounded by a constant. The class of infinite words whose set of factors is in $L_k$ is denoted by $W_k$. In this paper we focus on the relations between the classes $W_k$ and the subword complexity of infinite words, which is as usual defined as the number of factors of the word of length $n$. In particular, we prove that the class $W_{2}$ coincides with the class of
infinite words of linear complexity. On the other hand, although the class $W_{k}$ is included in the class of words of complexity $O(n^{k-1})$, this inclusion is strict for $k> 2$.
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
-
The number of binary rotation words
Authors:
Anna E. Frid,
Damien Jamet
Abstract:
We consider binary rotation words generated by partitions of the unit circle to two intervals and give a precise formula for the number of such words of length n. We also give the precise asymptotics for it, which happens to be O(n^4). The result continues the line initiated by the formula for the number of all Sturmian words obtained by Lipatov in 1982, then independently by Berenstein, Kanal, La…
▽ More
We consider binary rotation words generated by partitions of the unit circle to two intervals and give a precise formula for the number of such words of length n. We also give the precise asymptotics for it, which happens to be O(n^4). The result continues the line initiated by the formula for the number of all Sturmian words obtained by Lipatov in 1982, then independently by Berenstein, Kanal, Lavine and Olson in 1987, Mignosi in 1991, and then with another technique by Berstel and Pocchiola in 1993.
△ Less
Submitted 15 February, 2013;
originally announced February 2013.
-
On minimal factorizations of words as products of palindromes
Authors:
Anna E. Frid,
Svetlana Puzynina,
Luca Zamboni
Abstract:
Given a finite word u, we define its palindromic length |u|_{pal} to be the least number n such that u=v_1v_2... v_n with each v_i a palindrome. We address the following open question: Does there exist an infinite non ultimately periodic word w and a positive integer P such that |u|_{pal}<P for each factor u of w? We give a partial answer to this question by proving that if an infinite word w sati…
▽ More
Given a finite word u, we define its palindromic length |u|_{pal} to be the least number n such that u=v_1v_2... v_n with each v_i a palindrome. We address the following open question: Does there exist an infinite non ultimately periodic word w and a positive integer P such that |u|_{pal}<P for each factor u of w? We give a partial answer to this question by proving that if an infinite word w satisfies the so-called (k,l)-condition for some k and l, then for each positive integer P there exists a factor u of w whose palindromic length |u|_{pal}>P. In particular, the result holds for all the k-power-free words and for the Sierpinski word.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2012; v1 submitted 23 October, 2012;
originally announced October 2012.
-
Infinite permutations vs. infinite words
Authors:
Anna E. Frid
Abstract:
I am going to compare well-known properties of infinite words with those of infinite permutations, a new object studied since middle 2000s. Basically, it was Sergey Avgustinovich who invented this notion, although in an early study by Davis et al. permutations appear in a very similar framework as early as in 1977. I am going to tell about periodicity of permutations, their complexity according to…
▽ More
I am going to compare well-known properties of infinite words with those of infinite permutations, a new object studied since middle 2000s. Basically, it was Sergey Avgustinovich who invented this notion, although in an early study by Davis et al. permutations appear in a very similar framework as early as in 1977. I am going to tell about periodicity of permutations, their complexity according to several definitions and their automatic properties, that is, about usual parameters of words, now extended to permutations and behaving sometimes similarly to those for words, sometimes not. Another series of results concerns permutations generated by infinite words and their properties. Although this direction of research is young, many people, including two other speakers of this meeting, have participated in it, and I believe that several more topics for further study are really promising.
△ Less
Submitted 17 August, 2011;
originally announced August 2011.
-
Infinite permutations of lowest maximal pattern complexity
Authors:
S. V. Avgustinovich,
A. E. Frid,
T. Kamae,
P. V. Salimov
Abstract:
An infinite permutation is a linear ordering of the set of non-negative integers. Generally, the properties of infinite permutations analogous to those of infinite words show some resemblances and some differences between permutations and words. In this paper, we define maximal pattern complexity for infinite permutations and show that this complexity function is ultimately constant if and only…
▽ More
An infinite permutation is a linear ordering of the set of non-negative integers. Generally, the properties of infinite permutations analogous to those of infinite words show some resemblances and some differences between permutations and words. In this paper, we define maximal pattern complexity for infinite permutations and show that this complexity function is ultimately constant if and only if the permutation is ultimately periodic. Then we characterize the non-periodic permutations of minimal complexity (equal to n) and find that they all are constructed with the use of Sturmian words.
△ Less
Submitted 9 November, 2009; v1 submitted 29 October, 2009;
originally announced October 2009.
