-
Beyond Eviction Prediction: Leveraging Local Spatiotemporal Public Records to Inform Action
Authors:
Tasfia Mashiat,
Alex DiChristofano,
Patrick J. Fowler,
Sanmay Das
Abstract:
There has been considerable recent interest in scoring properties on the basis of eviction risk. The success of methods for eviction prediction is typically evaluated using different measures of predictive accuracy. However, the underlying goal of such prediction is to direct appropriate assistance to households that may be at greater risk so they remain stably housed. Thus, we must ask the questi…
▽ More
There has been considerable recent interest in scoring properties on the basis of eviction risk. The success of methods for eviction prediction is typically evaluated using different measures of predictive accuracy. However, the underlying goal of such prediction is to direct appropriate assistance to households that may be at greater risk so they remain stably housed. Thus, we must ask the question of how useful such predictions are in targeting outreach efforts - informing action. In this paper, we investigate this question using a novel dataset that matches information on properties, evictions, and owners. We perform an eviction prediction task to produce risk scores and then use these risk scores to plan targeted outreach policies. We show that the risk scores are, in fact, useful, enabling a theoretical team of caseworkers to reach more eviction-prone properties in the same amount of time, compared to outreach policies that are either neighborhood-based or focus on buildings with a recent history of evictions. We also discuss the importance of neighborhood and ownership features in both risk prediction and targeted outreach.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Discretionary Trees: Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy via Machine Learning
Authors:
Gaurab Pokharel,
Sanmay Das,
Patrick J. Fowler
Abstract:
Street-level bureaucrats interact directly with people on behalf of government agencies to perform a wide range of functions, including, for example, administering social services and policing. A key feature of street-level bureaucracy is that the civil servants, while tasked with implementing agency policy, are also granted significant discretion in how they choose to apply that policy in individ…
▽ More
Street-level bureaucrats interact directly with people on behalf of government agencies to perform a wide range of functions, including, for example, administering social services and policing. A key feature of street-level bureaucracy is that the civil servants, while tasked with implementing agency policy, are also granted significant discretion in how they choose to apply that policy in individual cases. Using that discretion could be beneficial, as it allows for exceptions to policies based on human interactions and evaluations, but it could also allow biases and inequities to seep into important domains of societal resource allocation. In this paper, we use machine learning techniques to understand street-level bureaucrats' behavior. We leverage a rich dataset that combines demographic and other information on households with information on which homelessness interventions they were assigned during a period when assignments were not formulaic. We find that caseworker decisions in this time are highly predictable overall, and some, but not all of this predictivity can be captured by simple decision rules. We theorize that the decisions not captured by the simple decision rules can be considered applications of caseworker discretion. These discretionary decisions are far from random in both the characteristics of such households and in terms of the outcomes of the decisions. Caseworkers typically only apply discretion to households that would be considered less vulnerable. When they do apply discretion to assign households to more intensive interventions, the marginal benefits to those households are significantly higher than would be expected if the households were chosen at random; there is no similar reduction in marginal benefit to households that are discretionarily allocated less intensive interventions, suggesting that caseworkers are improving outcomes using their knowledge.
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Feedback Dynamics of the Low-Income Rental Housing Market: Exploring Policy Responses to COVID-19
Authors:
Katherine Marcal,
Patrick J. Fowler,
Peter S. Hovmand
Abstract:
The COVID-19 recession threatens mass housing insecurity that undermines economic recovery. Unprecedented federal policy responses halt court-ordered evictions, but questions remain whether policies adequately account for dynamics that drive landlord-tenant interactions including accumulations of rental and mortgage arrears, rental unit availability, and low-income housing options. A system dynami…
▽ More
The COVID-19 recession threatens mass housing insecurity that undermines economic recovery. Unprecedented federal policy responses halt court-ordered evictions, but questions remain whether policies adequately account for dynamics that drive landlord-tenant interactions including accumulations of rental and mortgage arrears, rental unit availability, and low-income housing options. A system dynamics model probes complex feedback dynamics driving tenant and landlord decision-making in the low-income rental housing market pre- and post-pandemic protections. Feedback loops highlight tradeoffs considered by low-income tenants and landlords in the context of scarcity and uncertainty. Simulations suggest the eviction moratorium reduced evictions by 51% before its expiration in late 2021, but rental arrears, overcrowding, and homelessness remained high. Federal emergency rental assistance further contributed to kee** evictions low, but showed only modest effects on housing insecurity and homelessness. More rapid allocation of funds would substantially increase impact. Failure to address underlying financial hardship and limited affordable housing undermine COVID recovery.
△ Less
Submitted 25 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Trade-offs between Group Fairness Metrics in Societal Resource Allocation
Authors:
Tasfia Mashiat,
Xavier Gitiaux,
Huzefa Rangwala,
Patrick J. Fowler,
Sanmay Das
Abstract:
We consider social resource allocations that deliver an array of scarce supports to a diverse population. Such allocations pervade social service delivery, such as provision of homeless services, assignment of refugees to cities, among others. At issue is whether allocations are fair across sociodemographic groups and intersectional identities. Our paper shows that necessary trade-offs exist for f…
▽ More
We consider social resource allocations that deliver an array of scarce supports to a diverse population. Such allocations pervade social service delivery, such as provision of homeless services, assignment of refugees to cities, among others. At issue is whether allocations are fair across sociodemographic groups and intersectional identities. Our paper shows that necessary trade-offs exist for fairness in the context of scarcity; many reasonable definitions of equitable outcomes cannot hold simultaneously except under stringent conditions. For example, defining fairness in terms of improvement over a baseline inherently conflicts with defining fairness in terms of loss compared with the best possible outcome. Moreover, we demonstrate that the fairness trade-offs stem from heterogeneity across groups in intervention responses. Administrative records on homeless service delivery offer a real-world example. Building on prior work, we measure utilities for each household as the probability of reentry into homeless services if given three homeless services. Heterogeneity in utility distributions (conditional on received services) for several sociodemographic groups (e.g. single women with children versus without children) generates divergence across fairness metrics. We argue that such heterogeneity, and thus, fairness trade-offs pervade many social policy contexts.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
