-
Assessing Dynamic Effects on a Bayesian Matrix-Variate Dynamic Linear Model: an Application to fMRI Data Analysis
Authors:
Johnatan Cardona Jiménez,
Carlos A. de B. Pereira,
Victor Fossaluza
Abstract:
In this work, we propose a modeling procedure for fMRI data analysis using a Bayesian Matrix-Variate Dynamic Linear Model (MVDLM). With this type of model, less complex than the more traditional temporal-spatial models, we are able to take into account the temporal and -- at least locally -- the spatial structures that are usually present in this type of data. Despite employing a voxel-wise approa…
▽ More
In this work, we propose a modeling procedure for fMRI data analysis using a Bayesian Matrix-Variate Dynamic Linear Model (MVDLM). With this type of model, less complex than the more traditional temporal-spatial models, we are able to take into account the temporal and -- at least locally -- the spatial structures that are usually present in this type of data. Despite employing a voxel-wise approach, every voxel in the brain is jointly modeled with its nearest neighbors, which are defined through a euclidian metric. MVDLM's have been widely used in applications where the interest lies in to perform predictions and/or analysis of covariance structures among time series. In this context, our interest is rather to assess the dynamic effects which are related to voxel activation. In order to do so, we develop three algorithms to simulate online-trajectories related to the state parameter and with those curves or simulated trajectories we compute a Monte Carlo evidence for voxel activation. Through two practical examples and two different types of assessments, we show that our method can be viewed for the practitioners as a reliable tool for fMRI data analysis. Despite all the examples and analysis are illustrated just for a single subject analysis, we also describe how more general group analysis can be implemented.
△ Less
Submitted 20 January, 2020; v1 submitted 26 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Adaptative significance levels in linear regression models with known variance
Authors:
Alejandra Estefanía Patiño Hoyos,
Victor Fossaluza
Abstract:
The Full Bayesian Significance Test (FBST) for precise hypotheses was presented by Pereira and Stern [Entropy 1(4) (1999) 99-110] as a Bayesian alternative instead of the traditional significance test using p-value. The FBST is based on the evidence in favor of the null hypothesis (H). An important practical issue for the implementation of the FBST is the determination of how large the evidence mu…
▽ More
The Full Bayesian Significance Test (FBST) for precise hypotheses was presented by Pereira and Stern [Entropy 1(4) (1999) 99-110] as a Bayesian alternative instead of the traditional significance test using p-value. The FBST is based on the evidence in favor of the null hypothesis (H). An important practical issue for the implementation of the FBST is the determination of how large the evidence must be in order to decide for its rejection. In the Classical significance tests, it is known that p-value decreases as sample size increases, so by setting a single significance level, it usually leads H rejection. In the FBST procedure, the evidence in favor of H exhibits the same behavior as the p-value when the sample size increases. This suggests that the cut-off point to define the rejection of H in the FBST should be a sample size function. In this work, the scenario of Linear Regression Models with known variance under the Bayesian approach is considered, and a method to find a cut-off value for the evidence in the FBST is presented by minimizing the linear combination of the averaged type I and type II error probabilities for a given sample size and also for a given dimension of the parametric space.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Adaptative significance levels in normal mean hypothesis testing
Authors:
Alejandra Estefanía Patiño Hoyos,
Victor Fossaluza
Abstract:
The Full Bayesian Significance Test (FBST) for precise hypotheses was presented by Pereira and Stern (1999) as a Bayesian alternative instead of the traditional significance test based on p-value. The FBST uses the evidence in favor of the null hypothesis ($H_0$) calculated as the complement of the posterior probability of the highest posterior density region, which is tangent to the set defined b…
▽ More
The Full Bayesian Significance Test (FBST) for precise hypotheses was presented by Pereira and Stern (1999) as a Bayesian alternative instead of the traditional significance test based on p-value. The FBST uses the evidence in favor of the null hypothesis ($H_0$) calculated as the complement of the posterior probability of the highest posterior density region, which is tangent to the set defined by $H_0$. An important practical issue for the implementation of the FBST is the determination of how large the evidence must be in order to decide for its rejection. In the Classical significance tests, the most used measure for rejecting a hypothesis is p-value. It is known that p-value decreases as sample size increases, so by setting a single significance level, it usually leads $H_0$ rejection. In the FBST procedure, the evidence in favor of $H_0$ exhibits the same behavior as the p-value when the sample size increases. This suggests that the cut-off point to define the rejection of $H_0$ in the FBST should be a sample size function. In this work, we focus on the case of two-sided normal mean hypothesis testing and present a method to find a cut-off value for the evidence in the FBST by minimizing the linear combination of the type I error probability and the expected type II error probability for a given sample size.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
-
Full Bayesian Modeling for fMRI Group Analysis
Authors:
Johnatan Cardona Jiménez,
Carlos Alberto de Bragança Pereira,
Victor Fossaluza
Abstract:
Functional magnetic resonance imaging or functional MRI (fMRI) is a non-invasive way to assess brain activity by detecting changes associated with blood flow. In this work, we propose a full Bayesian procedure to analyze fMRI data for individual and group stages. For the individual stage we use a multivariate dynamic linear model (MDLM), where the temporal dependence is modeled through the state p…
▽ More
Functional magnetic resonance imaging or functional MRI (fMRI) is a non-invasive way to assess brain activity by detecting changes associated with blood flow. In this work, we propose a full Bayesian procedure to analyze fMRI data for individual and group stages. For the individual stage we use a multivariate dynamic linear model (MDLM), where the temporal dependence is modeled through the state parameters and the spatial dependence is modeled only locally, taking the nearest neighbors of each voxel location. For the group stage we take advantage of the posterior distribution of the state parameters obtained in the individual stage and create a new posterior distribution that represents the updated beliefs for the group analysis. Since the posterior distribution for the state parameters is indexed by the time $t$, we propose an algorithm that allows on-line estimated curves of the state parameters to be drawn and posterior probabilities computed in order to assess brain activation for both individual and group analysis. We propose an alternative analysis for the group stage using a Gaussian process ANOVA model, where the on-line estimated curves obtained in the individual stage are modeled as a functional response. Finally, we assess our proposed modeling procedure using real resting-state data and computing empirical false-positive brain activation rates.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Building complex networks through classical and Bayesian statistics - a comparison
Authors:
Lina D. Thomas,
Victor Fossaluza,
Anatoly Yambartsev
Abstract:
This research is about studying and comparing two different ways of building complex networks. The main goal of our study is to find an effective way to build networks, particularly when we have fewer observations than variables. We construct networks estimating the partial correlation coefficient on Classic Statistics (Inverse Method) and on Bayesian Statistics (Normal - Inverse Wishart conjugate…
▽ More
This research is about studying and comparing two different ways of building complex networks. The main goal of our study is to find an effective way to build networks, particularly when we have fewer observations than variables. We construct networks estimating the partial correlation coefficient on Classic Statistics (Inverse Method) and on Bayesian Statistics (Normal - Inverse Wishart conjugate prior). In this current work, in order to solve the problem of having less observations than variables, we propose a new methodology called local partial correlation, which consists of selecting, for each pair of variables, the other variables most correlated to the pair.We applied these methods on simulated data and compared them through ROC curves. The most attractive result is that, even though it has high computational costs, to use Bayesian inference on trees is better when we have less observations than variables. In other cases, both approaches present satisfactory results.
△ Less
Submitted 9 September, 2014;
originally announced September 2014.
