Perfused and Nonperfused Microaneurysms Identified and Characterized by Structural and Angiographic OCT
Authors:
Min Gao,
Tristan T. Hormel,
Yukun Guo,
Kotaro Tsuboi,
Christina J. Flaxel,
David Huang,
Thomas S. Hwang,
Yali Jia
Abstract:
Purpose: Microaneurysms (MAs) have distinct, oval-shaped, hyperreflective walls on structural OCT, and inconsistent flow signal in the lumen with OCT angiography (OCTA). Their relationship to regional macular edema in diabetic retinopathy (DR) has not been quantitatively explored. Participants: A total of 99 participants, including 23 with mild, NPDR, 25 with moderate NPDR, 34 with severe NPDR, an…
▽ More
Purpose: Microaneurysms (MAs) have distinct, oval-shaped, hyperreflective walls on structural OCT, and inconsistent flow signal in the lumen with OCT angiography (OCTA). Their relationship to regional macular edema in diabetic retinopathy (DR) has not been quantitatively explored. Participants: A total of 99 participants, including 23 with mild, NPDR, 25 with moderate NPDR, 34 with severe NPDR, and 17 with proliferative DR. Methods: We obtained 3 x 3-mm scans with a commercial device (Solix, Visionix/Optovue) in 99 patients with DR. Trained graders manually identified MAs and their location relative to the anatomic layers from cross-sectional OCT. Microaneurysms were first classified as perfused if flow signal was present in the OCTA channel. Then, perfused MAs were further classified into fully and partially perfused MAs based on the flow characteristics in en face OCTA. The presence of retinal fluid based on OCT near MAs was compared between perfused and nonperfused types. We also compared OCT-based MA detection to fundus photography (FP)- and fluorescein angiography (FA)-based detection. Results: We identified 308 MAs (166 fully perfused, 88 partially perfused, 54 nonperfused) in 42 eyes using OCT and OCTA. Nearly half of the MAs identified in this study straddle the inner nuclear layer and outer plexiform layer. Compared with partially perfused and nonperfused MAs, fully perfused MAs were more likely to be associated with local retinal fluid. The associated fluid volumes were larger with fully perfused MAs compared with other types. OCT/OCTA detected all MAs found on FP. Although not all MAs seen with FA were identified with OCT, some MAs seen with OCT were not visible with FA or FP. Conclusions: OCT-identified MAs with colocalized flow on OCTA are more likely to be associated with DME than those without flow.
△ Less
Submitted 9 October, 2023; v1 submitted 23 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
Interpretable Diabetic Retinopathy Diagnosis based on Biomarker Activation Map
Authors:
Pengxiao Zang,
Tristan T. Hormel,
Jie Wang,
Yukun Guo,
Steven T. Bailey,
Christina J. Flaxel,
David Huang,
Thomas S. Hwang,
Yali Jia
Abstract:
Deep learning classifiers provide the most accurate means of automatically diagnosing diabetic retinopathy (DR) based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and its angiography (OCTA). The power of these models is attributable in part to the inclusion of hidden layers that provide the complexity required to achieve a desired task. However, hidden layers also render algorithm outputs difficult to in…
▽ More
Deep learning classifiers provide the most accurate means of automatically diagnosing diabetic retinopathy (DR) based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and its angiography (OCTA). The power of these models is attributable in part to the inclusion of hidden layers that provide the complexity required to achieve a desired task. However, hidden layers also render algorithm outputs difficult to interpret. Here we introduce a novel biomarker activation map (BAM) framework based on generative adversarial learning that allows clinicians to verify and understand classifiers decision-making. A data set including 456 macular scans were graded as non-referable or referable DR based on current clinical standards. A DR classifier that was used to evaluate our BAM was first trained based on this data set. The BAM generation framework was designed by combing two U-shaped generators to provide meaningful interpretability to this classifier. The main generator was trained to take referable scans as input and produce an output that would be classified by the classifier as non-referable. The BAM is then constructed as the difference image between the output and input of the main generator. To ensure that the BAM only highlights classifier-utilized biomarkers an assistant generator was trained to do the opposite, producing scans that would be classified as referable by the classifier from non-referable scans. The generated BAMs highlighted known pathologic features including nonperfusion area and retinal fluid. A fully interpretable classifier based on these highlights could help clinicians better utilize and verify automated DR diagnosis.
△ Less
Submitted 26 June, 2023; v1 submitted 12 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
