-
Simulation-based inference of deep fields: galaxy population model and redshift distributions
Authors:
Beatrice Moser,
Tomasz Kacprzak,
Silvan Fischbacher,
Alexandre Refregier,
Dominic Grimm,
Luca Tortorelli
Abstract:
Accurate redshift calibration is required to obtain unbiased cosmological information from large-scale galaxy surveys. In a forward modelling approach, the redshift distribution n(z) of a galaxy sample is measured using a parametric galaxy population model constrained by observations. We use a model that captures the redshift evolution of the galaxy luminosity functions, colours, and morphology, f…
▽ More
Accurate redshift calibration is required to obtain unbiased cosmological information from large-scale galaxy surveys. In a forward modelling approach, the redshift distribution n(z) of a galaxy sample is measured using a parametric galaxy population model constrained by observations. We use a model that captures the redshift evolution of the galaxy luminosity functions, colours, and morphology, for red and blue samples. We constrain this model via simulation-based inference, using factorized Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) at the image level. We apply this framework to HSC deep field images, complemented with photometric redshifts from COSMOS2020. The simulated telescope images include realistic observational and instrumental effects. By applying the same processing and selection to real data and simulations, we obtain a sample of n(z) distributions from the ABC posterior. The photometric properties of the simulated galaxies are in good agreement with those from the real data, including magnitude, colour and redshift joint distributions. We compare the posterior n(z) from our simulations to the COSMOS2020 redshift distributions obtained via template fitting photometric data spanning the wavelength range from UV to IR. We mitigate sample variance in COSMOS by applying a reweighting technique. We thus obtain a good agreement between the simulated and observed redshift distributions, with a difference in the mean at the 1$σ$ level up to a magnitude of 24 in the i band. We discuss how our forward model can be applied to current and future surveys and be further extended. The ABC posterior and further material will be made publicly available at https://cosmology.ethz.ch/research/software-lab/ufig.html.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2024; v1 submitted 12 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Redshift requirements for cosmic shear with intrinsic alignment
Authors:
Silvan Fischbacher,
Tomasz Kacprzak,
Jonathan Blazek,
Alexandre Refregier
Abstract:
Intrinsic alignment (IA) modelling and photometric redshift estimation are two of the main sources of systematic uncertainty in weak lensing surveys. We investigate the impact of redshift errors and their interplay with different IA models. Generally, errors on the mean $δ_z$ and on the width $σ_z$ of the redshift bins can both lead to biases in cosmological constraints. We find that such biases c…
▽ More
Intrinsic alignment (IA) modelling and photometric redshift estimation are two of the main sources of systematic uncertainty in weak lensing surveys. We investigate the impact of redshift errors and their interplay with different IA models. Generally, errors on the mean $δ_z$ and on the width $σ_z$ of the redshift bins can both lead to biases in cosmological constraints. We find that such biases can, however, only be partially resolved by marginalizing over $δ_z$ and $σ_z$. For Stage-III surveys, $δ_z$ and $σ_z$ cannot be well constrained due to limited statistics. The resulting biases are thus sensitive to prior volume effects. For Stage-IV surveys, we observe that marginalizing over the redshift parameters has an impact and reduces the bias. We derive requirements on the uncertainty of $σ_z$ and $δ_z$ for both Stage-III and Stage-IV surveys. We assume that the redshift systematic errors on $S_8$ should be less than half of the statistical errors, and the median bias should be smaller than $0.25σ$. We find that the uncertainty on $δ_z$ has to be $\lesssim0.025$ for the NLA IA model with a Stage-III survey. For $σ_z$, the requirement is met even for large uncertainties $\leq0.3$. For the TATT IA model, the uncertainty on $δ_z$ has to be $\lesssim0.02$ and the uncertainty on $σ_z$ has to be $\lesssim0.2$. For Stage-IV surveys, the uncertainty on $δ_z$ has to be $\lesssim0.005$ and the uncertainty on $σ_z$ should be $\lesssim0.1$, with no significant dependence on the IA model. This required high precision will be a challenge for the redshift calibration of these future surveys. Finally, we investigate whether the interplay between redshift systematics and IA modelling can explain the $S_8$-tension between cosmic shear results and CMB measurements. We find that this is unlikely to explain the current $S_8$-tension.
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2022; v1 submitted 4 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Towards a full $w$CDM map-based analysis for weak lensing surveys
Authors:
Dominik Zürcher,
Janis Fluri,
Virginia Ajani,
Silvan Fischbacher,
Alexandre Refregier,
Tomasz Kacprzak
Abstract:
The next generation of weak lensing surveys will measure the matter distribution of the local Universe with unprecedented precision, allowing the resolution of non-Gaussian features of the convergence field. This encourages the use of higher-order mass-map statistics for cosmological parameter inference. We extend the forward-modelling based methodology introduced in a previous forecast paper to m…
▽ More
The next generation of weak lensing surveys will measure the matter distribution of the local Universe with unprecedented precision, allowing the resolution of non-Gaussian features of the convergence field. This encourages the use of higher-order mass-map statistics for cosmological parameter inference. We extend the forward-modelling based methodology introduced in a previous forecast paper to match these new requirements. We provide multiple forecasts for the wCDM parameter constraints that can be expected from stage 3 and 4 weak lensing surveys. We consider different survey setups, summary statistics and mass map filters including wavelets. We take into account the shear bias, photometric redshift uncertainties and intrinsic alignment. The impact of baryons is investigated and the necessary scale cuts are applied. We compare the angular power spectrum analysis to peak and minima counts as well as Minkowski functionals of the mass maps. We find a preference for Starlet over Gaussian filters. Our results suggest that using a survey setup with 10 instead of 5 tomographic redshift bins is beneficial. Adding cross-tomographic information improves the constraints on cosmology and especially on galaxy intrinsic alignment for all statistics. In terms of constraining power, we find the angular power spectrum and the peak counts to be equally matched for stage 4 surveys, followed by minima counts and the Minkowski functionals. Combining different summary statistics significantly improves the constraints and compensates the stringent scale cuts. We identify the most `cost-effective' combination to be the angular power spectrum, peak counts and Minkowski functionals following Starlet filtering.
△ Less
Submitted 16 August, 2023; v1 submitted 3 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
