The positive-negative mode link between brain connectivity, demographics, and behavior: A pre-registered replication of Smith et al. 2015
Authors:
Nikhil Goyal1,
Dustin Moraczewski,
Peter A. Bandettini,
Emily S. Finn,
Adam G. Thomas
Abstract:
In mental health research, it has proven difficult to find measures of brain function that provide reliable indicators of mental health and well-being, including susceptibility to mental health disorders. Recently, a family of data-driven analyses have provided such reliable measures when applied to large, population-level datasets. In the current pre-registered replication study, we show that the…
▽ More
In mental health research, it has proven difficult to find measures of brain function that provide reliable indicators of mental health and well-being, including susceptibility to mental health disorders. Recently, a family of data-driven analyses have provided such reliable measures when applied to large, population-level datasets. In the current pre-registered replication study, we show that the canonical correlation analysis (CCA) methods previously developed using resting-state MRI functional connectivity and subject measures of cognition and behavior from healthy adults are also effective in measuring well-being (a "positive-negative axis") in an independent developmental dataset. Our replication was successful in two out of three of our pre-registered criteria, such that a primary CCA mode's weights displayed a significant positive relationship and explained a significant amount of variance in both functional connectivity and subject measures. The only criteria that was not successful was that compared to other modes the magnitude of variance explained by the primary CCA mode was smaller than predicted, a result which could indicate a developmental trajectory of a primary mode. This replication establishes a signature neurotypical relationship between connectivity and phenotype, opening new avenues of research in neuroscience with clear clinical applications.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
Popular individuals process the world in particularly normative ways
Authors:
Elisa C. Baek,
Ryan Hyon,
Karina López,
Emily S. Finn,
Mason A. Porter,
Carolyn Parkinson
Abstract:
People differ in how they attend to, interpret, and respond to their surroundings. Convergent processing of the world may be one factor that contributes to social connections between individuals. We used neuroimaging and network analysis to investigate whether the most central individuals in their communities (as measured by in-degree centrality, a notion of popularity) process the world in a part…
▽ More
People differ in how they attend to, interpret, and respond to their surroundings. Convergent processing of the world may be one factor that contributes to social connections between individuals. We used neuroimaging and network analysis to investigate whether the most central individuals in their communities (as measured by in-degree centrality, a notion of popularity) process the world in a particularly normative way. We found that more central individuals had exceptionally similar neural responses to their peers and especially to each other in brain regions that are associated with high-level interpretations and social cognition (e.g., in the default-mode network), whereas less-central individuals exhibited more idiosyncratic responses. Self-reported enjoyment of and interest in stimuli followed a similar pattern, but accounting for these data did not change our main results. These findings suggest that highly-central individuals process the world in exceptionally similar ways, whereas less-central individuals process the world in idiosyncratic ways.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2021; v1 submitted 4 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
