-
Adapting to time: why nature evolved a diverse set of neurons
Authors:
Karim G. Habashy,
Benjamin D. Evans,
Dan F. M. Goodman,
Jeffrey S. Bowers
Abstract:
Brains have evolved a diverse set of neurons with varying morphologies, physiological properties and rich dynamics that impact their processing of temporal information. By contrast, most neural network models include a homogeneous set of units that only vary in terms of their spatial parameters (weights and biases). To investigate the importance of temporal parameters to neural function, we traine…
▽ More
Brains have evolved a diverse set of neurons with varying morphologies, physiological properties and rich dynamics that impact their processing of temporal information. By contrast, most neural network models include a homogeneous set of units that only vary in terms of their spatial parameters (weights and biases). To investigate the importance of temporal parameters to neural function, we trained spiking neural networks on tasks of varying temporal complexity, with different subsets of parameters held constant. We find that in a tightly resource constrained setting, adapting conduction delays is essential to solve all test conditions, and indeed that it is possible to solve these tasks using only temporal parameters (delays and time constants) with weights held constant. In the most complex spatio-temporal task we studied, we found that an adaptable bursting parameter was essential. More generally, allowing for adaptation of both temporal and spatial parameters increases network robustness to noise, an important feature for both biological brains and neuromorphic computing systems. In summary, our findings highlight how rich and adaptable dynamics are key to solving temporally structured tasks at a low neural resource cost, which may be part of the reason why biological neurons vary so dramatically in their physiological properties.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2024; v1 submitted 22 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
MindSet: Vision. A toolbox for testing DNNs on key psychological experiments
Authors:
Valerio Biscione,
Dong Yin,
Gaurav Malhotra,
Marin Dujmovic,
Milton L. Montero,
Guillermo Puebla,
Federico Adolfi,
Rachel F. Heaton,
John E. Hummel,
Benjamin D. Evans,
Karim Habashy,
Jeffrey S. Bowers
Abstract:
Multiple benchmarks have been developed to assess the alignment between deep neural networks (DNNs) and human vision. In almost all cases these benchmarks are observational in the sense they are composed of behavioural and brain responses to naturalistic images that have not been manipulated to test hypotheses regarding how DNNs or humans perceive and identify objects. Here we introduce the toolbo…
▽ More
Multiple benchmarks have been developed to assess the alignment between deep neural networks (DNNs) and human vision. In almost all cases these benchmarks are observational in the sense they are composed of behavioural and brain responses to naturalistic images that have not been manipulated to test hypotheses regarding how DNNs or humans perceive and identify objects. Here we introduce the toolbox MindSet: Vision, consisting of a collection of image datasets and related scripts designed to test DNNs on 30 psychological findings. In all experimental conditions, the stimuli are systematically manipulated to test specific hypotheses regarding human visual perception and object recognition. In addition to providing pre-generated datasets of images, we provide code to regenerate these datasets, offering many configurable parameters which greatly extend the dataset versatility for different research contexts, and code to facilitate the testing of DNNs on these image datasets using three different methods (similarity judgments, out-of-distribution classification, and decoder method), accessible at https://github.com/MindSetVision/mindset-vision. We test ResNet-152 on each of these methods as an example of how the toolbox can be used.
△ Less
Submitted 8 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Unifying F1TENTH Autonomous Racing: Survey, Methods and Benchmarks
Authors:
Benjamin David Evans,
Raphael Trumpp,
Marco Caccamo,
Felix Jahncke,
Johannes Betz,
Hendrik Willem Jordaan,
Herman Arnold Engelbrecht
Abstract:
The F1TENTH autonomous driving platform, consisting of 1:10-scale remote-controlled cars, has evolved into a well-established education and research platform. The many publications and real-world competitions span many domains, from classical path planning to novel learning-based algorithms. Consequently, the field is wide and disjointed, hindering direct comparison of developed methods and making…
▽ More
The F1TENTH autonomous driving platform, consisting of 1:10-scale remote-controlled cars, has evolved into a well-established education and research platform. The many publications and real-world competitions span many domains, from classical path planning to novel learning-based algorithms. Consequently, the field is wide and disjointed, hindering direct comparison of developed methods and making it difficult to assess the state-of-the-art. Therefore, we aim to unify the field by surveying current approaches, describing common methods, and providing benchmark results to facilitate clear comparisons and establish a baseline for future work. This research aims to survey past and current work with F1TENTH vehicles in the classical and learning categories and explain the different solution approaches. We describe particle filter localisation, trajectory optimisation and tracking, model predictive contouring control, follow-the-gap, and end-to-end reinforcement learning. We provide an open-source evaluation of benchmark methods and investigate overlooked factors of control frequency and localisation accuracy for classical methods as well as reward signal and training map for learning methods. The evaluation shows that the optimisation and tracking method achieves the fastest lap times, followed by the online planning approach. Finally, our work identifies and outlines the relevant research aspects to help motivate future work in the F1TENTH domain.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2024; v1 submitted 28 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
High-performance Racing on Unmapped Tracks using Local Maps
Authors:
Benjamin David Evans,
Hendrik Willem Jordaan,
Herman Arnold Engelbrecht
Abstract:
Map-based methods for autonomous racing estimate the vehicle's location, which is used to follow a high-level plan. While map-based optimisation methods demonstrate high-performance results, they are limited by requiring a map of the environment. In contrast, mapless methods can operate in unmapped contexts since they directly process raw sensor data (often LiDAR) to calculate commands. However, a…
▽ More
Map-based methods for autonomous racing estimate the vehicle's location, which is used to follow a high-level plan. While map-based optimisation methods demonstrate high-performance results, they are limited by requiring a map of the environment. In contrast, mapless methods can operate in unmapped contexts since they directly process raw sensor data (often LiDAR) to calculate commands. However, a major limitation in mapless methods is poor performance due to a lack of optimisation. In response, we propose the local map framework that uses easily extractable, low-level features to build local maps of the visible region that form the input to optimisation-based controllers. Our local map generation extracts the visible racetrack boundaries and calculates a centreline and track widths used for planning. We evaluate our method for simulated F1Tenth autonomous racing using a two-stage trajectory optimisation and tracking strategy and a model predictive controller. Our method achieves lap times that are 8.8% faster than the Follow-The-Gap method and 3.22% faster than end-to-end neural networks due to the optimisation resulting in a faster speed profile. The local map planner is 3.28% slower than global methods that have access to an entire map of the track that can be used for planning. Critically, our approach enables high-speed autonomous racing on unmapped tracks, achieving performance similar to global methods without requiring a track map.
△ Less
Submitted 31 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
High-speed Autonomous Racing using Trajectory-aided Deep Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Benjamin David Evans,
Herman Arnold Engelbrecht,
Hendrik Willem Jordaan
Abstract:
The classical method of autonomous racing uses real-time localisation to follow a precalculated optimal trajectory. In contrast, end-to-end deep reinforcement learning (DRL) can train agents to race using only raw LiDAR scans. While classical methods prioritise optimization for high-performance racing, DRL approaches have focused on low-performance contexts with little consideration of the speed p…
▽ More
The classical method of autonomous racing uses real-time localisation to follow a precalculated optimal trajectory. In contrast, end-to-end deep reinforcement learning (DRL) can train agents to race using only raw LiDAR scans. While classical methods prioritise optimization for high-performance racing, DRL approaches have focused on low-performance contexts with little consideration of the speed profile. This work addresses the problem of using end-to-end DRL agents for high-speed autonomous racing. We present trajectory-aided learning (TAL) that trains DRL agents for high-performance racing by incorporating the optimal trajectory (racing line) into the learning formulation. Our method is evaluated using the TD3 algorithm on four maps in the open-source F1Tenth simulator. The results demonstrate that our method achieves a significantly higher lap completion rate at high speeds compared to the baseline. This is due to TAL training the agent to select a feasible speed profile of slowing down in the corners and roughly tracking the optimal trajectory.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Bypassing the Simulation-to-reality Gap: Online Reinforcement Learning using a Supervisor
Authors:
Benjamin David Evans,
Johannes Betz,
Hongrui Zheng,
Herman A. Engelbrecht,
Rahul Mangharam,
Hendrik W. Jordaan
Abstract:
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is a promising method to learn control policies for robots only from demonstration and experience. To cover the whole dynamic behaviour of the robot, DRL training is an active exploration process typically performed in simulation environments. Although this simulation training is cheap and fast, applying DRL algorithms to real-world settings is difficult. If agent…
▽ More
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is a promising method to learn control policies for robots only from demonstration and experience. To cover the whole dynamic behaviour of the robot, DRL training is an active exploration process typically performed in simulation environments. Although this simulation training is cheap and fast, applying DRL algorithms to real-world settings is difficult. If agents are trained until they perform safely in simulation, transferring them to physical systems is difficult due to the sim-to-real gap caused by the difference between the simulation dynamics and the physical robot. In this paper, we present a method of online training a DRL agent to drive autonomously on a physical vehicle by using a model-based safety supervisor. Our solution uses a supervisory system to check if the action selected by the agent is safe or unsafe and ensure that a safe action is always implemented on the vehicle. With this, we can bypass the sim-to-real problem while training the DRL algorithm safely, quickly, and efficiently. We compare our method with conventional learning in simulation and on a physical vehicle. We provide a variety of real-world experiments where we train online a small-scale vehicle to drive autonomously with no prior simulation training. The evaluation results show that our method trains agents with improved sample efficiency while never crashing, and the trained agents demonstrate better driving performance than those trained in simulation.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2023; v1 submitted 22 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
