Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Efron, Y

Unitary Complexity and the Uhlmann Transformation Problem

Authors: John Bostanci, Yuval Efron, Tony Metger, Alexander Poremba, Luowen Qian, Henry Yuen

Abstract: State transformation problems such as compressing quantum information or breaking quantum commitments are fundamental quantum tasks. However, their computational difficulty cannot easily be characterized using traditional complexity theory, which focuses on tasks with classical inputs and outputs. To study the complexity of such state transformation tasks, we introduce a framework for unitary sy… ▽ More State transformation problems such as compressing quantum information or breaking quantum commitments are fundamental quantum tasks. However, their computational difficulty cannot easily be characterized using traditional complexity theory, which focuses on tasks with classical inputs and outputs. To study the complexity of such state transformation tasks, we introduce a framework for unitary synthesis problems, including notions of reductions and unitary complexity classes. We use this framework to study the complexity of transforming one entangled state into another via local operations. We formalize this as the Uhlmann Transformation Problem, an algorithmic version of Uhlmann's theorem. Then, we prove structural results relating the complexity of the Uhlmann Transformation Problem, polynomial space quantum computation, and zero knowledge protocols. The Uhlmann Transformation Problem allows us to characterize the complexity of a variety of tasks in quantum information processing, including decoding noisy quantum channels, breaking falsifiable quantum cryptographic assumptions, implementing optimal prover strategies in quantum interactive proofs, and decoding the Hawking radiation of black holes. Our framework for unitary complexity thus provides new avenues for studying the computational complexity of many natural quantum information processing tasks. △ Less

Submitted 19 November, 2023; v1 submitted 22 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: 126 pages, comments welcome. updated some references in v2

Nearly Optimal Communication and Query Complexity of Bipartite Matching

Authors: Joakim Blikstad, Jan van den Brand, Yuval Efron, Sagnik Mukhopadhyay, Danupon Nanongkai

Abstract: We settle the complexities of the maximum-cardinality bipartite matching problem (BMM) up to poly-logarithmic factors in five models of computation: the two-party communication, AND query, OR query, XOR query, and quantum edge query models. Our results answer open problems that have been raised repeatedly since at least three decades ago [Hajnal, Maass, and Turan STOC'88; Ivanyos, Klauck, Lee, San… ▽ More We settle the complexities of the maximum-cardinality bipartite matching problem (BMM) up to poly-logarithmic factors in five models of computation: the two-party communication, AND query, OR query, XOR query, and quantum edge query models. Our results answer open problems that have been raised repeatedly since at least three decades ago [Hajnal, Maass, and Turan STOC'88; Ivanyos, Klauck, Lee, Santha, and de Wolf FSTTCS'12; Dobzinski, Nisan, and Oren STOC'14; Nisan SODA'21] and tighten the lower bounds shown by Beniamini and Nisan [STOC'21] and Zhang [ICALP'04]. We also settle the communication complexity of the generalizations of BMM, such as maximum-cost bipartite $b$-matching and transshipment; and the query complexity of unique bipartite perfect matching (answering an open question by Beniamini [2022]). Our algorithms and lower bounds follow from simple applications of known techniques such as cutting planes methods and set disjointness. △ Less

Submitted 4 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: Accepted in FOCS 2022

Cut query algorithms with star contraction

Authors: Simon Apers, Yuval Efron, Paweł Gawrychowski, Troy Lee, Sagnik Mukhopadhyay, Danupon Nanongkai

Abstract: We study the complexity of determining the edge connectivity of a simple graph with cut queries. We show that (i) there is a bounded-error randomized algorithm that computes edge connectivity with $O(n)$ cut queries, and (ii) there is a bounded-error quantum algorithm that computes edge connectivity with $Õ(\sqrt{n})$ cut queries. We prove these results using a new technique called "star contracti… ▽ More We study the complexity of determining the edge connectivity of a simple graph with cut queries. We show that (i) there is a bounded-error randomized algorithm that computes edge connectivity with $O(n)$ cut queries, and (ii) there is a bounded-error quantum algorithm that computes edge connectivity with $Õ(\sqrt{n})$ cut queries. We prove these results using a new technique called "star contraction" to randomly contract edges of a graph while preserving non-trivial minimum cuts. In star contraction vertices randomly contract an edge incident on a small set of randomly chosen vertices. In contrast to the related 2-out contraction technique of Ghaffari, Nowicki, and Thorup [SODA'20], star contraction only contracts vertex-disjoint star subgraphs, which allows it to be efficiently implemented via cut queries. The $O(n)$ bound from item (i) was not known even for the simpler problem of connectivity, and improves the $O(n\log^3 n)$ bound by Rubinstein, Schramm, and Weinberg [ITCS'18]. The bound is tight under the reasonable conjecture that the randomized communication complexity of connectivity is $Ω(n\log n)$, an open question since the seminal work of Babai, Frankl, and Simon [FOCS'86]. The bound also excludes using edge connectivity on simple graphs to prove a superlinear randomized query lower bound for minimizing a symmetric submodular function. Item (ii) gives a nearly-quadratic separation with the randomized complexity and addresses an open question of Lee, Santha, and Zhang [SODA'21]. The algorithm can also be viewed as making $Õ(\sqrt{n})$ matrix-vector multiplication queries to the adjacency matrix. Finally, we demonstrate the use of star contraction outside of the cut query setting by designing a one-pass semi-streaming algorithm for computing edge connectivity in the vertex arrival setting. This contrasts with the edge arrival setting where two passes are required. △ Less

Submitted 14 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Distributed Distance Approximation

Authors: Bertie Ancona, Keren Censor-Hillel, Mina Dalirrooyfard, Yuval Efron, Virginia Vassilevska Williams

Abstract: Diameter, radius and eccentricities are fundamental graph parameters, which are extensively studied in various computational settings. Typically, computing approximate answers can be much more efficient compared with computing exact solutions. In this paper, we give a near complete characterization of the trade-offs between approximation ratios and round complexity of distributed algorithms for ap… ▽ More Diameter, radius and eccentricities are fundamental graph parameters, which are extensively studied in various computational settings. Typically, computing approximate answers can be much more efficient compared with computing exact solutions. In this paper, we give a near complete characterization of the trade-offs between approximation ratios and round complexity of distributed algorithms for approximating these parameters, with a focus on the weighted and directed variants. Furthermore, we study \emph{bi-chromatic} variants of these parameters defined on a graph whose vertices are colored either red or blue, and one focuses only on distances for pairs of vertices that are colored differently. Motivated by applications in computational geometry, bi-chromatic diameter, radius and eccentricities have been recently studied in the sequential setting [Backurs et al. STOC'18, Dalirrooyfard et al. ICALP'19]. We provide the first distributed upper and lower bounds for such problems. Our technical contributions include introducing the notion of \emph{approximate pseudo-center}, which extends the \emph{pseudo-centers} of [Choudhary and Gold SODA'20], and presenting an efficient distributed algorithm for computing approximate pseudo-centers. On the lower bound side, our constructions introduce the usage of new functions into the framework of reductions from 2-party communication complexity to distributed algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 5 December, 2020; v1 submitted 10 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Distributed Weighted Min-Cut in Nearly-Optimal Time

Authors: Michal Dory, Yuval Efron, Sagnik Mukhopadhyay, Danupon Nanongkai

Abstract: Minimum-weight cut (min-cut) is a basic measure of a network's connectivity strength. While the min-cut can be computed efficiently in the sequential setting [Karger STOC'96], there was no efficient way for a distributed network to compute its own min-cut without limiting the input structure or drop** the output quality: In the standard CONGEST model, existing algorithms with nearly-optimal time… ▽ More Minimum-weight cut (min-cut) is a basic measure of a network's connectivity strength. While the min-cut can be computed efficiently in the sequential setting [Karger STOC'96], there was no efficient way for a distributed network to compute its own min-cut without limiting the input structure or drop** the output quality: In the standard CONGEST model, existing algorithms with nearly-optimal time (e.g. [Ghaffari, Kuhn, DISC'13; Nanongkai, Su, DISC'14]) can guarantee a solution that is $(1+ε)$-approximation at best while the exact $\tilde O(n^{0.8}D^{0.2} + n^{0.9})$-time algorithm [Ghaffari, Nowicki, Thorup, SODA'20] works only on *simple* networks (no weights and no parallel edges). Here $n$ and $D$ denote the network's number of vertices and hop-diameter, respectively. For the weighted case, the best bound was $\tilde O(n)$ [Daga, Henzinger, Nanongkai, Saranurak, STOC'19]. In this paper, we provide an *exact* $\tilde O(\sqrt n + D)$-time algorithm for computing min-cut on *weighted* networks. Our result improves even the previous algorithm that works only on simple networks. Its time complexity matches the known lower bound up to polylogarithmic factors. At the heart of our algorithm are a clever routing trick and two structural lemmas regarding the structure of a minimum cut of a graph. These two structural lemmas considerably strengthen and generalize the framework of Mukhopadhyay-Nanongkai [STOC'20] and can be of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 16 November, 2020; v1 submitted 20 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Comments: Major changes: (i) The fragment decomposition technique is simplified, (ii) Introduction and technical overview have been redone, and (iii) The technical sections have been made simpler for better readability

Beyond Alice and Bob: Improved Inapproximability for Maximum Independent Set in CONGEST

Authors: Yuval Efron, Ofer Grossman, Seri Khoury

Abstract: By far the most fruitful technique for showing lower bounds for the CONGEST model is reductions to two-party communication complexity. This technique has yielded nearly tight results for various fundamental problems such as distance computations, minimum spanning tree, minimum vertex cover, and more. In this work, we take this technique a step further, and we introduce a framework of reductions… ▽ More By far the most fruitful technique for showing lower bounds for the CONGEST model is reductions to two-party communication complexity. This technique has yielded nearly tight results for various fundamental problems such as distance computations, minimum spanning tree, minimum vertex cover, and more. In this work, we take this technique a step further, and we introduce a framework of reductions to $t$-party communication complexity, for every $t\geq 2$. Our framework enables us to show improved hardness results for maximum independent set. Recently, Bachrach et al.[PODC 2019] used the two-party framework to show hardness of approximation for maximum independent set. They show that finding a $(5/6+ε)$-approximation requires $Ω(n/\log^6 n)$ rounds, and finding a $(7/8+ε)$-approximation requires $Ω(n^2/\log^7 n)$ rounds, in the CONGEST model where $n$ in the number of nodes in the network. We improve the results of Bachrach et al. by using reductions to multi-party communication complexity. Our results: (1) Any algorithm that finds a $(1/2+ε)$-approximation for maximum independent set in the CONGEST model requires $Ω(n/\log^3 n)$ rounds. (2) Any algorithm that finds a $(3/4+ε)$-approximation for maximum independent set in the CONGEST model requires $Ω(n^2/\log^3 n)$ rounds. △ Less

Submitted 27 May, 2020; v1 submitted 16 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Classification of distributed binary labeling problems

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Yuval Efron, Juho Hirvonen, Yannic Maus, Dennis Olivetti, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: We present a complete classification of the deterministic distributed time complexity for a family of graph problems: binary labeling problems in trees. These are locally checkable problems that can be encoded with an alphabet of size two in the edge labeling formalism. Examples of binary labeling problems include sinkless orientation, sinkless and sourceless orientation, 2-vertex coloring, perfec… ▽ More We present a complete classification of the deterministic distributed time complexity for a family of graph problems: binary labeling problems in trees. These are locally checkable problems that can be encoded with an alphabet of size two in the edge labeling formalism. Examples of binary labeling problems include sinkless orientation, sinkless and sourceless orientation, 2-vertex coloring, perfect matching, and the task of coloring edges red and blue such that all nodes are incident to at least one red and at least one blue edge. More generally, we can encode e.g. any cardinality constraints on indegrees and outdegrees. We study the deterministic time complexity of solving a given binary labeling problem in trees, in the usual LOCAL model of distributed computing. We show that the complexity of any such problem is in one of the following classes: $O(1)$, $Θ(\log n)$, $Θ(n)$, or unsolvable. In particular, a problem that can be represented in the binary labeling formalism cannot have time complexity $Θ(\log^* n)$, and hence we know that e.g. any encoding of maximal matchings has to use at least three labels (which is tight). Furthermore, given the description of any binary labeling problem, we can easily determine in which of the four classes it is and what is an asymptotically optimal algorithm for solving it. Hence the distributed time complexity of binary labeling problems is decidable, not only in principle, but also in practice: there is a simple and efficient algorithm that takes the description of a binary labeling problem and outputs its distributed time complexity. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2020; v1 submitted 29 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Hardness of Distributed Optimization

Authors: Nir Bachrach, Keren Censor-Hillel, Michal Dory, Yuval Efron, Dean Leitersdorf, Ami Paz

Abstract: This paper studies lower bounds for fundamental optimization problems in the CONGEST model. We show that solving problems exactly in this model can be a hard task, by providing $\tildeΩ(n^2)$ lower bounds for cornerstone problems, such as minimum dominating set (MDS), Hamiltonian path, Steiner tree and max-cut. These are almost tight, since all of these problems can be solved optimally in… ▽ More This paper studies lower bounds for fundamental optimization problems in the CONGEST model. We show that solving problems exactly in this model can be a hard task, by providing $\tildeΩ(n^2)$ lower bounds for cornerstone problems, such as minimum dominating set (MDS), Hamiltonian path, Steiner tree and max-cut. These are almost tight, since all of these problems can be solved optimally in $O(n^2)$ rounds. Moreover, we show that even in bounded-degree graphs and even in simple graphs with maximum degree 5 and logarithmic diameter, it holds that various tasks, such as finding a maximum independent set (MaxIS) or a minimum vertex cover, are still difficult, requiring a near-tight number of $\tildeΩ(n)$ rounds. Furthermore, we show that in some cases even approximations are difficult, by providing an $\tildeΩ(n^2)$ lower bound for a $(7/8+ε)$-approximation for MaxIS, and a nearly-linear lower bound for an $O(\log{n})$-approximation for the $k$-MDS problem for any constant $k \geq 2$, as well as for several variants of the Steiner tree problem. Our lower bounds are based on a rich variety of constructions that leverage novel observations, and reductions among problems that are specialized for the CONGEST model. However, for several additional approximation problems, as well as for exact computation of some central problems in $P$, such as maximum matching and max flow, we show that such constructions cannot be designed, by which we exemplify some limitations of this framework. △ Less

Submitted 24 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Double and Triple Node-Erasure-Correcting Codes over Graphs

Authors: Lev Yohananov, Yuval Efron, Eitan Yaakobi

Abstract: In this paper we study array-based codes over graphs for correcting multiple node failures. These codes have applications to neural networks, associative memories, and distributed storage systems. We assume that the information is stored on the edges of a complete undirected graph and a node failure is the event where all the edges in the neighborhood of a given node have been erased. A code over… ▽ More In this paper we study array-based codes over graphs for correcting multiple node failures. These codes have applications to neural networks, associative memories, and distributed storage systems. We assume that the information is stored on the edges of a complete undirected graph and a node failure is the event where all the edges in the neighborhood of a given node have been erased. A code over graphs is called $ρ$-node-erasure-correcting if it allows to reconstruct the erased edges upon the failure of any $ρ$ nodes or less. We present a binary optimal construction for double-node-erasure correction together with an efficient decoding algorithm, when the number of nodes is a prime number. Furthermore, we extend this construction for triple-node-erasure-correcting codes when the number of nodes is a prime number and two is a primitive element in $\Z_n$. These codes are at most a single bit away from optimality. △ Less

Submitted 21 December, 2018; v1 submitted 2 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.