Assessing the accuracy of the star formation rate measurements by direct star count in molecular clouds
Authors:
Sami Dib,
Jian Wen Zhou,
Sébastien Comerón,
Luis E. Garduño,
Valery V. Kravtsov,
Paul C. Clark,
Guang-Xing Li,
Maritza A. Lara-López,
Tie Liu,
Mohsen Shadmehri,
James R. Doughty
Abstract:
Star formation estimates based on the counting of YSOs is commonly applied to nearby star-forming regions in the Galaxy. With this method, the SFRs are measured using the counts of YSOs in a particular protostellar Class, a typical protostellar mass, and the lifetime associated with this Class. However, the assumptions underlying the validity of the method such as that of a constant star formation…
▽ More
Star formation estimates based on the counting of YSOs is commonly applied to nearby star-forming regions in the Galaxy. With this method, the SFRs are measured using the counts of YSOs in a particular protostellar Class, a typical protostellar mass, and the lifetime associated with this Class. However, the assumptions underlying the validity of the method such as that of a constant star formation history (SFH) and whether the method is valid for all protostellar Classes has never been fully tested. In this work, we use Monte Carlo models to test the validity of the method. We build synthetic clusters in which stars form at times that are randomly drawn from a specified SFH. The latter is either constant or time-dependent with a burst like behavior. The masses of the protostars are randomly drawn from an IMF which can be either similar to that of the Milky Way field or be variable . For each star in every cluster, the lifetimes associated with the different protostellar classes are also randomly drawn from Gaussian distribution functions centered around their most likely value as suggested by the observations. We find that only the SFR derived using the Class 0 population can reproduce the true SFR at all epochs, and this is true irrespective of the shape of the SFH. For a constant SFH, the SFR derived using the more evolved populations of protostars (Classes I, F, II, and III) reproduce the real SFR only at later epochs which correspond to epochs at which their numbers have reached a steady state. For a time-dependent burst-like SFH, all SFR estimates based on the number counts of the evolved populations fail to reproduce the true SFR. We also show how the offsets between Class I and Class II based SFRs and the true SFR plotted as a function of the number ratios of Class I and Class II versus Class III YSOs can be used in order to constrain the SFH of observed molecular clouds.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
Carbon loss from forest degradation exceeds that from deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
Authors:
Yuanwei Qin,
Xiangming Xiao,
Jean-Pierre Wigneron,
Philippe Ciais,
Martin Brandt,
Lei Fan,
Xiaojun Li,
Sean Crowell,
Xiaocui Wu,
Russell Doughty,
Yao Zhang,
Fang Liu,
Stephen Sitch,
Berrien Moore III
Abstract:
Spatial-temporal dynamics of aboveground biomass (AGB) and forest area affect the carbon cycle, climate, and biodiversity in the Brazilian Amazon. Here we investigate inter-annual changes of AGB and forest area by analyzing satellite-based annual AGB and forest area datasets. We found the gross forest area loss was larger in 2019 than in 2015, possibly due to recent loosening of forest protection…
▽ More
Spatial-temporal dynamics of aboveground biomass (AGB) and forest area affect the carbon cycle, climate, and biodiversity in the Brazilian Amazon. Here we investigate inter-annual changes of AGB and forest area by analyzing satellite-based annual AGB and forest area datasets. We found the gross forest area loss was larger in 2019 than in 2015, possibly due to recent loosening of forest protection policies. However, net AGB loss was three times smaller in 2019 than in 2015. During 2010-2019, the Brazilian Amazon had a cumulative gross loss of 4.45 Pg C against a gross gain of 3.78 Pg C, resulting in net AGB loss of 0.67 Pg C. Forest degradation (73%) contributed three times more to the gross AGB loss than deforestation (27%), given that the areal extent of degradation exceeds deforestation. This indicates that forest degradation has become the largest process driving carbon loss and should become a higher policy priority.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
