-
Equivalent Time Active Cavitation Imaging
Authors:
Simon Blais,
Jonathan Poree,
Gerardo Ramos-Palacios,
Samuel Desmarais,
Vincent Perrot,
Abbas Sadikot,
Jean Provost
Abstract:
The development of neurologically active drugs faces a challenge in treating brain diseases due to the blood-brain barrier's impermeability. High-intensity focused ultrasound can open the barrier in a targeted manner, expanding treatment options. However, this procedure risks brain damage and off-target effects without proper monitoring. Current monitoring methods have limitations. We present Equi…
▽ More
The development of neurologically active drugs faces a challenge in treating brain diseases due to the blood-brain barrier's impermeability. High-intensity focused ultrasound can open the barrier in a targeted manner, expanding treatment options. However, this procedure risks brain damage and off-target effects without proper monitoring. Current monitoring methods have limitations. We present Equivalent Time Active Cavitation Imaging, a novel ultrasound modality that characterizes the ultrasound pressure field during treatment. This system utilizes a unique plane wave sequence and an algorithm to filter the microbubble signal for pressure field map**. We conducted pressure measurements in vitro for comparison with hydrophones and in vivo during blood-brain barrier opening in mice. Our modality successfully spatiotemporally characterizes the pressure field with an active imaging setup, demonstrating good correlation with hydrophone measurements. Experimental in vivo results are promising, establishing the feasibility of this monitoring method. In conclusion, this proof of concept represents a significant step toward a new ultrasound modality for monitoring blood-brain barrier opening using focused ultrasound. This approach offers a safer and more precise monitoring method, opening new possibilities for treating brain diseases.
△ Less
Submitted 19 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Equivalent-Time-Active-Cavitation-Imaging Enables Vascular-Resolution Blood-Brain-Barrier-Opening-Therapy Planning
Authors:
Samuel Desmarais,
Gerardo Ramos-Palacios,
Jonathan Poree,
Stephen A. Lee,
Alexis Leconte,
Abbas F. Sadikot,
Jean Provost
Abstract:
Linking cavitation and anatomy was found to be important for predictable outcomes in Focused-Ultrasound Blood-Brain-Barrier-Opening and requires high resolution cavitation map**. However, cavitation map** techniques for planning and monitoring of therapeutic procedures either 1) do not leverage the full resolution capabilities of ultrasound imaging or 2) place strong constraints on the length…
▽ More
Linking cavitation and anatomy was found to be important for predictable outcomes in Focused-Ultrasound Blood-Brain-Barrier-Opening and requires high resolution cavitation map**. However, cavitation map** techniques for planning and monitoring of therapeutic procedures either 1) do not leverage the full resolution capabilities of ultrasound imaging or 2) place strong constraints on the length of the therapeutic pulse. This study aimed to develop a high-resolution technique that could resolve vascular anatomy in the cavitation map. Herein, we develop BP-ETACI, derived from bandpass sampling and dual-frequency contrast imaging at 12.5 MHz to produce cavitation maps prior and during blood-brain barrier opening with long therapeutic bursts using a 1.5-MHz focused transducer in the brain of C57BL/6 mice. The BP-ETACI cavitation maps were found to correlate with the vascular anatomy in ultrasound localization microscopy vascular maps and in histological sections. Cavitation maps produced from non-blood-brain-barrier disrupting doses showed the same cavitation-bearing vasculature as maps produced over entire blood-brain-barrier opening procedures, allowing use for 1) monitoring FUS-BBBO, but also for 2) therapy planning and target verification. BP-ETACI is versatile, created high resolution cavitation maps in the mouse brain and is easily translatable to existing FUS-BBBO experiments. As such, it provides a means to further study cavitation phenomena in FUS-BBBO.
△ Less
Submitted 7 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
It's COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness Benchmarks
Authors:
Michelle Bao,
Angela Zhou,
Samantha Zottola,
Brian Brubach,
Sarah Desmarais,
Aaron Horowitz,
Kristian Lum,
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Abstract:
Risk assessment instrument (RAI) datasets, particularly ProPublica's COMPAS dataset, are commonly used in algorithmic fairness papers due to benchmarking practices of comparing algorithms on datasets used in prior work. In many cases, this data is used as a benchmark to demonstrate good performance without accounting for the complexities of criminal justice (CJ) processes. However, we show that pr…
▽ More
Risk assessment instrument (RAI) datasets, particularly ProPublica's COMPAS dataset, are commonly used in algorithmic fairness papers due to benchmarking practices of comparing algorithms on datasets used in prior work. In many cases, this data is used as a benchmark to demonstrate good performance without accounting for the complexities of criminal justice (CJ) processes. However, we show that pretrial RAI datasets can contain numerous measurement biases and errors, and due to disparities in discretion and deployment, algorithmic fairness applied to RAI datasets is limited in making claims about real-world outcomes. These reasons make the datasets a poor fit for benchmarking under assumptions of ground truth and real-world impact. Furthermore, conventional practices of simply replicating previous data experiments may implicitly inherit or edify normative positions without explicitly interrogating value-laden assumptions. Without context of how interdisciplinary fields have engaged in CJ research and context of how RAIs operate upstream and downstream, algorithmic fairness practices are misaligned for meaningful contribution in the context of CJ, and would benefit from transparent engagement with normative considerations and values related to fairness, justice, and equality. These factors prompt questions about whether benchmarks for intrinsically socio-technical systems like the CJ system can exist in a beneficial and ethical way.
△ Less
Submitted 28 April, 2022; v1 submitted 10 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
