Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Davidson, J C

Field-dependent magnetic relaxation times of magnetic nanoparticle systems: analytic approximations supported by numerical simulations

Authors: Jonathon C. Davidson, Nicholas R. Anderson, Karen L. Livesey

Abstract: Many estimates for the magnetic relaxation time of magnetic nanoparticle systems neglect the effect of the applied field strength. This is despite many applications of magnetic nanoparticles involving relaxation dynamics under the influence of applied fields. Here, an analytic approximation for the field-dependent Brownian relaxation time of single-domain, spherical magnetic nanoparticles in an ex… ▽ More Many estimates for the magnetic relaxation time of magnetic nanoparticle systems neglect the effect of the applied field strength. This is despite many applications of magnetic nanoparticles involving relaxation dynamics under the influence of applied fields. Here, an analytic approximation for the field-dependent Brownian relaxation time of single-domain, spherical magnetic nanoparticles in an external applied field is developed mathematically. This expression is validated by comparison with existing empirically-derived expressions and by comparison to particle-level simulations that allow particle rotations. Our approximation works particularly well for larger particles. We then use the developed expression to analytically calculate the total magnetic relaxation time when both Brownian and Néel relaxation mechanisms are at play. Again, we show that the results match those found using particle-level simulations, this time with both particle rotations and internal magnetization dynamics allowed. However, for some particle parameters and for large field strengths, our simulations reveal that the Brownian and Néel relaxation mechanisms are decoupled and it is not appropriate to combine these to calculate a total relaxation time. △ Less

Submitted 18 June, 2024; v1 submitted 6 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: 10 pages, 5 figures, submitted to Physical Review B

Forward-Backward Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Ashley D. Edwards, Laura Downs, James C. Davidson

Abstract: Goals for reinforcement learning problems are typically defined through hand-specified rewards. To design such problems, developers of learning algorithms must inherently be aware of what the task goals are, yet we often require agents to discover them on their own without any supervision beyond these sparse rewards. While much of the power of reinforcement learning derives from the concept that a… ▽ More Goals for reinforcement learning problems are typically defined through hand-specified rewards. To design such problems, developers of learning algorithms must inherently be aware of what the task goals are, yet we often require agents to discover them on their own without any supervision beyond these sparse rewards. While much of the power of reinforcement learning derives from the concept that agents can learn with little guidance, this requirement greatly burdens the training process. If we relax this one restriction and endow the agent with knowledge of the reward function, and in particular of the goal, we can leverage backwards induction to accelerate training. To achieve this, we propose training a model to learn to take imagined reversal steps from known goal states. Rather than training an agent exclusively to determine how to reach a goal while moving forwards in time, our approach travels backwards to jointly predict how we got there. We evaluate our work in Gridworld and Towers of Hanoi and empirically demonstrate that it yields better performance than standard DDQN. △ Less

Submitted 27 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.