How reproducible are methods to measure the dynamic viscoelastic properties of poroelastic media?
Authors:
Paolo Bonfiglio,
Francesco Pompoli,
Kirill V. Horoshenkov,
Mahmud Iskandar B Seth A Rahim,
Luc Jaouen,
Julia Rodenas,
Francois-Xavier Becot,
Emmanuel Gourdon,
Dirk Jaeger,
Volker Kursch,
Maurizio Tarello,
Nicolaas Bernardus Roozen,
Christ Glorieux,
Fabrizio Ferrian,
Pierre Leroy,
Francesco Briatico Vangosa,
Nicolas Dauchez,
Felix Foucart,
Lei Lei,
Kevin Carillo,
Olivier Doutres,
Franck Sgard,
Raymond Panneton,
Kevin Verdiere,
Claudio Bertolini1
, et al. (8 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
There is a considerable number of research publications on the acoustical properties of porous media with an elastic frame. A simple search through the Web of ScienceTM (last accessed 21 March 2018) suggests that there are at least 819 publications which deal with the acoustics of poroelastic media. A majority of these researches require accurate knowledge of the elastic properties over a broad fr…
▽ More
There is a considerable number of research publications on the acoustical properties of porous media with an elastic frame. A simple search through the Web of ScienceTM (last accessed 21 March 2018) suggests that there are at least 819 publications which deal with the acoustics of poroelastic media. A majority of these researches require accurate knowledge of the elastic properties over a broad frequency range. However, the accuracy of the measurement of the dynamic elastic properties of poroelastic media has been a contentious issue. The novelty of this paper is that it studies the reproducibility of some popular experimental methods which are used routinely to measure the key elastic properties such as the dynamic Young's modulus, loss factor and Poisson ratio of poroelastic media. In this paper, fourteen independent sets of laboratory measurements were performed on specimens of the same porous materials. The results from these measurements suggest that the reproducibility of this type of experimental method is poor. This work can be helpful to suggest improvements which can be developed to harmonize the way the elastic properties of poroelastic media are measured worldwide.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
Validity of the one-dimensional limp model for porous materials
Authors:
Olivier Doutres,
Nicolas Dauchez,
Jean-Michel Génevaux,
Olivier Dazel
Abstract:
A straightforward criterion to determine the limp model validity for porous materials is addressed here. The limp model is an "equivalent fluid" model which gives a better description of the porous behavior than the well known "rigid frame" model. It is derived from the poroelastic Biot model assuming that the frame has no bulk stiffness. A criterion is proposed to identify the porous materials…
▽ More
A straightforward criterion to determine the limp model validity for porous materials is addressed here. The limp model is an "equivalent fluid" model which gives a better description of the porous behavior than the well known "rigid frame" model. It is derived from the poroelastic Biot model assuming that the frame has no bulk stiffness. A criterion is proposed to identify the porous materials for which the limp model can be used. It relies on a new parameter, the Frame Stiffness Influence FSI based on porous material properties. The critical values of FSI under which the limp model can be used, are determined using a 1D analytical modeling for a specific boundary set: radiation of a vibrating plate covered by a porous layer.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2008;
originally announced October 2008.