-
The impact of the dynamical state of galaxy groups on the stellar populations of central galaxies
Authors:
Mojtaba Raouf,
Rory Smith,
Habib G. Khosroshahi,
Ali A. Dariush,
Simon Driver,
Jongwan Ko,
Ho Seong Hwang
Abstract:
We study the stellar populations of the brightest group galaxies (BGGs) in groups with different dynamical states, using GAMA survey data. We use two independent, luminosity dependent indicators to probe the relaxedness of their groups; the magnitude gap between the two most luminous galaxies ($ΔM_{12}$), and offset between BGG and the luminosity center ($D_{offset}$) of the group. Combined, these…
▽ More
We study the stellar populations of the brightest group galaxies (BGGs) in groups with different dynamical states, using GAMA survey data. We use two independent, luminosity dependent indicators to probe the relaxedness of their groups; the magnitude gap between the two most luminous galaxies ($ΔM_{12}$), and offset between BGG and the luminosity center ($D_{offset}$) of the group. Combined, these two indicators were previously found useful for identifying relaxed and unrelaxed groups. We find that the BGGs of unrelaxed groups have significantly bluer NUV-r colours than in relaxed groups. This is also true at the fixed sersic index. We find the bluer colours cannot be explained away by differing dust fraction, suggesting there are real differences in their stellar populations. SFRs derived from SED-fitting tend to be higher in unrelaxed systems. This is in part because of a greater fraction of BGGs with non-elliptical morphology, but also because unrelaxed systems have larger numbers of mergers, some of which may bring fuel for star formation. The SED-fitted stellar metallicities of BGGs in unrelaxed systems also tend to be higher by around 0.05 dex, perhaps because their building blocks were more massive. We find that the $ΔM_{12}$ parameter is the most important parameter behind the observed differences in the relaxed/unrelaxed groups, in contrast with the previous study of Trevisan et al. (2017). We also find that groups selected to be unrelaxed using our criteria tend to have higher velocity offsets between the BGG and their group.
△ Less
Submitted 7 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Merger history of central galaxies in Semi-Analytic Models of galaxy formation
Authors:
Mojtaba Raouf,
Habib G. Khosroshahi,
Gary A. Mamon,
Darren J. Croton,
Abdolhosein Hashemizadeh,
Ali A. Dariush
Abstract:
We investigate the dynamical evolution of galaxies in groups with different formation epochs. Galaxy groups have been selected to be in different dynamical states, namely dynamically old and dynamically young, which reflect their early and late formation times, respectively, based on their halo mass assembly. Brightest galaxies in dynamically young groups have suffered their last major galaxy merg…
▽ More
We investigate the dynamical evolution of galaxies in groups with different formation epochs. Galaxy groups have been selected to be in different dynamical states, namely dynamically old and dynamically young, which reflect their early and late formation times, respectively, based on their halo mass assembly. Brightest galaxies in dynamically young groups have suffered their last major galaxy merger typically $\sim 2$ Gyr more recently than their counterparts in dynamically old groups. Furthermore, we study the evolution of velocity dispersion in these two classes and compare them with the analytic models of isolated halos. The velocity dispersion of dwarf galaxies in high mass, dynamically young groups increases slowly in time, while the analogous dispersion in dynamically old high-mass groups is constant. In contrast, the velocity dispersion of giant galaxies in low mass groups decreases rapidly at late times. This increasing velocity bias is caused by dynamical friction, and starts much earlier in the dynamically old groups. The recent {\sc Radio-SAGE} model of galaxy formation suggests that radio luminosities of central galaxies, considered to be tracers of AGN activity, are enhanced in halos that assembled more recently, independent of the time since the last major merger.
△ Less
Submitted 20 June, 2018; v1 submitted 6 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
Evolution of compact and fossil groups of galaxies from semi-analytical models of galaxy formation
Authors:
Amin Farhang,
Habib G. Khosroshahi,
Gary A. Mamon,
Ali A. Dariush,
Mojtaba Raouf
Abstract:
We compare the mean mass assembly histories of compact and fossil galaxy groups in the Millennium dark matter simulation and an associated semi-analytic galaxy formation model. Tracing the halo mass of compact groups (CGs) from z=0 to z=1 shows that, on average, 55 per cent of the halo mass in compact groups is assembled since z~1, compared to 40 per cent of the halo mass in fossil groups (FGs) in…
▽ More
We compare the mean mass assembly histories of compact and fossil galaxy groups in the Millennium dark matter simulation and an associated semi-analytic galaxy formation model. Tracing the halo mass of compact groups (CGs) from z=0 to z=1 shows that, on average, 55 per cent of the halo mass in compact groups is assembled since z~1, compared to 40 per cent of the halo mass in fossil groups (FGs) in the same time interval, indicating that compared to FGs, CGs are relatively younger galaxy systems. At z=0, for a given halo mass, fossil groups tend to have a larger concentration than compact groups. Investigating the evolution of CG's parameters show that they become more compact with time. CGs at z=0.5 see their magnitude gaps increase exponentially, but it takes ~10 Gyr for them to reach a magnitude gap of 2 magnitudes. The slow growth of the magnitude gap leads to only a minority (~41 per cent) of CGs selected at z=0.5 turning into a FG by z=0. Also, while three-quarters of FGs go through a compact phase, most fail to meet the CG isolation criterion, leaving only ~30 per cent of FGs fully satisfying the CG selection criteria. Therefore, there is no strong link of CGs turning into FGs or FGs originating from CGs. The relation between CGs and FGs is thus more complex, and in most cases, FGs and CGs follow different evolutionary tracks.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
-
Evolution of galaxy groups in the Illustris simulation
Authors:
Mojtaba Raouf,
Habib G. Khosroshahi,
Ali A. Dariush
Abstract:
We present the first study of evolution of galaxy groups in the Illustris simulation. We focus on dynamically relaxed and unrelaxed galaxy groups representing dynamically evolved and evolving galaxy systems, respectively. The evolutionary state of a group is probed from its luminosity gap and separation between the brightest group galaxy and the center of mass of the group members. We find that th…
▽ More
We present the first study of evolution of galaxy groups in the Illustris simulation. We focus on dynamically relaxed and unrelaxed galaxy groups representing dynamically evolved and evolving galaxy systems, respectively. The evolutionary state of a group is probed from its luminosity gap and separation between the brightest group galaxy and the center of mass of the group members. We find that the Illustris simulation, over-produces large luminosity gap galaxy systems, known as fossil systems, in comparison to observations and the probed semi-analytical predictions. However, this simulation is equally successful in recovering the correlation between luminosity gap and luminosity centroid offset, in comparison to the probed semi-analytic model. We find evolutionary tracks based on luminosity gap which indicate that a large luminosity gap group is rooted in a small luminosity gap group, regardless of the position of the brightest group galaxy within the halo. This simulation helps, for the first time, to explore the black hole mass and its accretion rate in galaxy groups. For a given stellar mass of the brightest group galaxies, the black hole mass is larger in dynamically relaxed groups with a lower rate of mass accretion. We find this consistent with the latest observational studies of the radio activities in the brightest group galaxies in fossil groups. We also find that the IGM in dynamically evolved groups is hotter for a given halo mass than that in evolving groups, again consistent with earlier observational studies.
△ Less
Submitted 18 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
Evolution of the galaxy luminosity function in progenitors of fossil groups
Authors:
G. Gozaliasl,
H. G. Khosroshahi,
A. A. Dariush,
A. Finoguenov,
D. M. Z. Jassur,
A. Molaeinajad
Abstract:
Using the semi-analytic models based on the Millennium simulation, we trace back the evolution of the luminosity function of galaxies residing in progenitors of groups classified by the magnitude gap at redshift zero. We determine the luminosity function of galaxies within $ 0.25R_{200}, 0.5R_{200} $, and $R_{200}$ for galaxy groups/clusters. The bright end of the galaxy luminosity function of fos…
▽ More
Using the semi-analytic models based on the Millennium simulation, we trace back the evolution of the luminosity function of galaxies residing in progenitors of groups classified by the magnitude gap at redshift zero. We determine the luminosity function of galaxies within $ 0.25R_{200}, 0.5R_{200} $, and $R_{200}$ for galaxy groups/clusters. The bright end of the galaxy luminosity function of fossil groups shows a significant evolution with redshift, with changes in $M^*$ by $\sim$ 1-2 mag between $z\sim0.5$ and $z=0$ (for the central $0.5R_{200}$), suggesting that the formation of the most luminous galaxy in a fossil group has had a significant impact on the $M^{*}$ galaxies e.g. it is formed as a result of multiple mergers of the $ M^{*} $ galaxies within the last $\sim5$ Gyr. In contrast, the slope of the faint end, $α$, of the luminosity function shows no considerable redshift evolution and the number of dwarf galaxies in the fossil groups exhibits no evolution, unlike in non-fossil groups where it grows by $\sim25-42\%$ towards low redshifts. In agreement with previous studies, we also show that fossil groups accumulate most of their halo mass earlier than non-fossil groups. Selecting the fossils at a redshift of 1 and tracing them to a redshift 0, we show that $80\%$ of the fossil groups ($10^{13} M_{\odot} h^{-1}<M_{200}<10^{14} M_{\odot} h^{-1}$) will lose their large magnitude gaps. However, about $40\%$ of fossil clusters ($M_{200}>10^{14} M_{\odot} h^{-1}$) will retain their large gaps.
△ Less
Submitted 3 September, 2014;
originally announced September 2014.
-
Optically selected fossil groups; X-ray observations and galaxy properties
Authors:
Habib G. Khosroshahi,
Ghassem Gozaliasl,
Jesper Rasmussen,
Alireza Molaeinezhad,
Trevor Ponman,
Ali A. Dariush,
Alastair J. R. Sanderson
Abstract:
We report on the X-ray and optical observations of galaxy groups selected from the 2dfGRS group catalog, to explore the possibility that galaxy groups hosting a giant elliptical galaxy and a large optical luminosity gap present between the two brightest group galaxies, can be associated with an extended X-ray emission, similar to that observed in fossil galaxy groups. The X-ray observations of 4 g…
▽ More
We report on the X-ray and optical observations of galaxy groups selected from the 2dfGRS group catalog, to explore the possibility that galaxy groups hosting a giant elliptical galaxy and a large optical luminosity gap present between the two brightest group galaxies, can be associated with an extended X-ray emission, similar to that observed in fossil galaxy groups. The X-ray observations of 4 galaxy groups were carried out with Chandra telescope with 10-20 ksec exposure time. Combining the X-ray and the optical observations we find evidences for the presence of a diffuse extended X-ray emission beyond the optical size of the brightest group galaxy. Taking both the X-ray and the optical criteria, one of the groups is identified as a fossil group and one is ruled out because of the contamination in the earlier optical selection. For the two remaining systems, the X-ay luminosity threshold is close to the convention know for fossil groups. In all cases the X-ray luminosity is below the expected value from the X-ray selected fossils for a given optical luminosity of the group. A rough estimation for the comoving number density of fossil groups is obtained and found to be in broad agreement with the estimations from observations of X-ray selected fossils and predictions of cosmological simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
-
Ultimate age-dating method for galaxy groups; clues from the Millennium Simulations
Authors:
Mojtaba Raouf,
Habib G. Khosroshahi,
Trevor J. Ponman,
Ali A. Dariush,
Alireza Molaeinezhad,
Saeed Tavasoli
Abstract:
There have been a number of studies dedicated to identification of fossil galaxy groups, arguably groups with a relatively old formation epoch. Most of such studies identify fossil groups, primarily based on a large luminosity gap, which is the magnitude gap between the two most luminous galaxies in the group. Studies of these types of groups in the millennium cosmological simulations show that, a…
▽ More
There have been a number of studies dedicated to identification of fossil galaxy groups, arguably groups with a relatively old formation epoch. Most of such studies identify fossil groups, primarily based on a large luminosity gap, which is the magnitude gap between the two most luminous galaxies in the group. Studies of these types of groups in the millennium cosmological simulations show that, although they have accumulated a significant fraction of their mass, relatively earlier than groups with a small luminosity gap, this parameter alone is not highly efficient in fully discriminating between the "old" and "young" galaxy groups, a label assigned based on halo mass accumulation history.
We study galaxies drawn from the semi-analytic models of Guo et al. (2011), based on the Millennium Simulation. We establish a set of four observationally measurable parameters which can be used in combination, to identify a subset of galaxy groups which are old, with a very high probability. We thus argue that a sample of fossil groups selected based on luminosity gap will result in a contaminated sample of old galaxy groups. By adding constraints on the luminosity of the brightest galaxy, and its offset from the group luminosity centroid, we can considerably improve the age-dating.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2014; v1 submitted 15 May, 2014;
originally announced May 2014.
-
The mass assembly of galaxy groups and the evolution of the magnitude gap
Authors:
Ali A. Dariush,
Somak Raychaudhury,
Trevor J. Ponman,
Habib G. Khosroshahi,
Andrew J. Benson,
Richard G. Bower,
Frazer Pearce
Abstract:
We investigate the assembly of groups and clusters of galaxies using the Millennium dark matter simulation and the associated gas simulations and semi-analytic catalogues of galaxies. In particular, in order to find an observable quantity that could be used to identify early-formed groups, we study the development of the difference in magnitude between their brightest galaxies to assess the use…
▽ More
We investigate the assembly of groups and clusters of galaxies using the Millennium dark matter simulation and the associated gas simulations and semi-analytic catalogues of galaxies. In particular, in order to find an observable quantity that could be used to identify early-formed groups, we study the development of the difference in magnitude between their brightest galaxies to assess the use of magnitude gaps as possible indicators. We select galaxy groups and clusters at redshift z=1 with dark matter halo mass M(R200) > 1E13/h Msun, and trace their properties until the present time (z=0). We consider only the systems with X-ray luminosity L_X> 0.25E42/h^2 erg/s at z=0. While it is true that a large magnitude gap between the two brightest galaxies of a particular group often indicates that a large fraction of its mass was assembled at an early epoch, it is not a necessary condition. More than 90% of fossil groups defined on the basis of their magnitude gaps (at any epoch between 0<z<1) cease to be fossils within 4 Gyr, mostly because other massive galaxies are assembled within their cores, even though most of the mass in their haloes might have been assembled at early times. We show that, compared to the conventional definition of fossil galaxy groups based on the magnitude gap Delta m(12)> 2 (in the R-band, within 0.5R200 of the centre of the group), an alternative criterion Delta m(14)>2.5 (within the same radius) finds 50% more early-formed systems, and those that on average retain their fossil phase longer. However, the conventional criterion performs marginally better at finding early-formed groups at the high-mass end of groups. Nevertheless, both criteria fail to identify a majority of the early-formed systems.
△ Less
Submitted 23 February, 2010;
originally announced February 2010.
