Showing 1–41 of 41 results for author: Dadush, D

Strongly Polynomial Frame Scaling to High Precision

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Akshay Ramachandran

Abstract: The frame scaling problem is: given vectors $U := \{u_{1}, ..., u_{n} \} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{d}$, marginals $c \in \mathbb{R}^{n}_{++}$, and precision $\varepsilon > 0$, find left and right scalings $L \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times d}, r \in \mathbb{R}^n$ such that $(v_1,\dots,v_n) := (Lu_1 r_1,\dots,Lu_nr_n)$ simultaneously satisfies $\sum_{i=1}^n v_i v_i^{\mathsf{T}} = I_d$ and… ▽ More The frame scaling problem is: given vectors $U := \{u_{1}, ..., u_{n} \} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{d}$, marginals $c \in \mathbb{R}^{n}_{++}$, and precision $\varepsilon > 0$, find left and right scalings $L \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times d}, r \in \mathbb{R}^n$ such that $(v_1,\dots,v_n) := (Lu_1 r_1,\dots,Lu_nr_n)$ simultaneously satisfies $\sum_{i=1}^n v_i v_i^{\mathsf{T}} = I_d$ and $\|v_{j}\|_{2}^{2} = c_{j}, \forall j \in [n]$, up to error $\varepsilon$. This problem has appeared in a variety of fields throughout linear algebra and computer science. In this work, we give a strongly polynomial algorithm for frame scaling with $\log(1/\varepsilon)$ convergence. This answers a question of Diakonikolas, Tzamos and Kane (STOC 2023), who gave the first strongly polynomial randomized algorithm with poly$(1/\varepsilon)$ convergence for the special case $c = \frac{d}{n} 1_{n}$. Our algorithm is deterministic, applies for general $c \in \mathbb{R}^{n}_{++}$, and requires $O(n^{3} \log(n/\varepsilon))$ iterations as compared to $O(n^{5} d^{11}/\varepsilon^{5})$ iterations of DTK. By lifting the framework of Linial, Samorodnitsky and Wigderson (Combinatorica 2000) for matrix scaling to frames, we are able to simplify both the algorithm and analysis. Our main technical contribution is to generalize the potential analysis of LSW to the frame setting and compute an update step in strongly polynomial time that achieves geometric progress in each iteration. In fact, we can adapt our results to give an improved analysis of strongly polynomial matrix scaling, reducing the $O(n^{5} \log(n/\varepsilon))$ iteration bound of LSW to $O(n^{3} \log(n/\varepsilon))$. Additionally, we prove a novel bound on the size of approximate frame scaling solutions, involving the condition measure $\barχ$ studied in the linear programming literature, which may be of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 7 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: Comments welcome

Optimizing Low Dimensional Functions over the Integers

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Arthur Léonard, Lars Rohwedder, José Verschae

Abstract: We consider box-constrained integer programs with objective $g(Wx) + c^T x$, where $g$ is a "complicated" function with an $m$ dimensional domain. Here we assume we have $n \gg m$ variables and that $W \in \mathbb Z^{m \times n}$ is an integer matrix with coefficients of absolute value at most $Δ$. We design an algorithm for this problem using only the mild assumption that the objective can be opt… ▽ More We consider box-constrained integer programs with objective $g(Wx) + c^T x$, where $g$ is a "complicated" function with an $m$ dimensional domain. Here we assume we have $n \gg m$ variables and that $W \in \mathbb Z^{m \times n}$ is an integer matrix with coefficients of absolute value at most $Δ$. We design an algorithm for this problem using only the mild assumption that the objective can be optimized efficiently when all but $m$ variables are fixed, yielding a running time of $n^m(m Δ)^{O(m^2)}$. Moreover, we can avoid the term $n^m$ in several special cases, in particular when $c = 0$. Our approach can be applied in a variety of settings, generalizing several recent results. An important application are convex objectives of low domain dimension, where we imply a recent result by Hunkenschröder et al. [SIOPT'22] for the 0-1-hypercube and sharp or separable convex $g$, assuming $W$ is given explicitly. By avoiding the direct use of proximity results, which only holds when $g$ is separable or sharp, we match their running time and generalize it for arbitrary convex functions. In the case where the objective is only accessible by an oracle and $W$ is unknown, we further show that their proximity framework can be implemented in $n (m Δ)^{O(m^2)}$-time instead of $n (m Δ)^{O(m^3)}$. Lastly, we extend the result by Eisenbrand and Weismantel [SODA'17, TALG'20] for integer programs with few constraints to a mixed-integer linear program setting where integer variables appear in only a small number of different constraints. △ Less

Submitted 4 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: To appear at IPCO 2023

From approximate to exact integer programming

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Friedrich Eisenbrand, Thomas Rothvoss

Abstract: Approximate integer programming is the following: For a convex body $K \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$, either determine whether $K \cap \mathbb{Z}^n$ is empty, or find an integer point in the convex body scaled by $2$ from its center of gravity $c$. Approximate integer programming can be solved in time $2^{O(n)}$ while the fastest known methods for exact integer programming run in time… ▽ More Approximate integer programming is the following: For a convex body $K \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$, either determine whether $K \cap \mathbb{Z}^n$ is empty, or find an integer point in the convex body scaled by $2$ from its center of gravity $c$. Approximate integer programming can be solved in time $2^{O(n)}$ while the fastest known methods for exact integer programming run in time $2^{O(n)} \cdot n^n$. So far, there are no efficient methods for integer programming known that are based on approximate integer programming. Our main contribution are two such methods, each yielding novel complexity results. First, we show that an integer point $x^* \in (K \cap \mathbb{Z}^n)$ can be found in time $2^{O(n)}$, provided that the remainders of each component $x_i^* \mod{\ell}$ for some arbitrarily fixed $\ell \geq 5(n+1)$ of $x^*$ are given. The algorithm is based on a cutting-plane technique, iteratively halving the volume of the feasible set. The cutting planes are determined via approximate integer programming. Enumeration of the possible remainders gives a $2^{O(n)}n^n$ algorithm for general integer programming. This matches the current best bound of an algorithm by Dadush (2012) that is considerably more involved. Our algorithm also relies on a new asymmetric approximate Carathéodory theorem that might be of interest on its own. Our second method concerns integer programming problems in equation-standard form $Ax = b, 0 \leq x \leq u, \, x \in \mathbb{Z}^n$ . Such a problem can be reduced to the solution of $\prod_i O(\log u_i +1)$ approximate integer programming problems. This implies, for example that knapsack or subset-sum problems with polynomial variable range $0 \leq x_i \leq p(n)$ can be solved in time $(\log n)^{O(n)}$. For these problems, the best running time so far was $n^n \cdot 2^{O(n)}$. △ Less

Submitted 8 April, 2024; v1 submitted 7 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

MSC Class: 15A; 52B; 52C; 68Q; 68R; 68W; 90B; 90C ACM Class: F.2.2; G.1.6

A nearly optimal randomized algorithm for explorable heap selection

Authors: Sander Borst, Daniel Dadush, Sophie Huiberts, Danish Kashaev

Abstract: Explorable heap selection is the problem of selecting the $n$th smallest value in a binary heap. The key values can only be accessed by traversing through the underlying infinite binary tree, and the complexity of the algorithm is measured by the total distance traveled in the tree (each edge has unit cost). This problem was originally proposed as a model to study search strategies for the branch-… ▽ More Explorable heap selection is the problem of selecting the $n$th smallest value in a binary heap. The key values can only be accessed by traversing through the underlying infinite binary tree, and the complexity of the algorithm is measured by the total distance traveled in the tree (each edge has unit cost). This problem was originally proposed as a model to study search strategies for the branch-and-bound algorithm with storage restrictions by Karp, Saks and Widgerson (FOCS '86), who gave deterministic and randomized $n\cdot \exp(O(\sqrt{\log{n}}))$ time algorithms using $O(\log(n)^{2.5})$ and $O(\sqrt{\log n})$ space respectively. We present a new randomized algorithm with running time $O(n\log(n)^3)$ using $O(\log n)$ space, substantially improving the previous best randomized running time at the expense of slightly increased space usage. We also show an $Ω(\log(n)n/\log(\log(n)))$ for any algorithm that solves the problem in the same amount of space, indicating that our algorithm is nearly optimal. △ Less

Submitted 12 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Interior point methods are not worse than Simplex

Authors: Xavier Allamigeon, Daniel Dadush, Georg Loho, Bento Natura, László A. Végh

Abstract: We develop a new `subspace layered least squares' interior point method (IPM) for solving linear programs. Applied to an $n$-variable linear program in standard form, the iteration complexity of our IPM is up to an $O(n^{1.5} \log n)$ factor upper bounded by the \emph{straight line complexity} (SLC) of the linear program. This term refers to the minimum number of segments of any piecewise linear c… ▽ More We develop a new `subspace layered least squares' interior point method (IPM) for solving linear programs. Applied to an $n$-variable linear program in standard form, the iteration complexity of our IPM is up to an $O(n^{1.5} \log n)$ factor upper bounded by the \emph{straight line complexity} (SLC) of the linear program. This term refers to the minimum number of segments of any piecewise linear curve that traverses the \emph{wide neighborhood} of the central path, a lower bound on the iteration complexity of any IPM that follows a piecewise linear trajectory along a path induced by a self-concordant barrier. In particular, our algorithm matches the number of iterations of any such IPM up to the same factor $O(n^{1.5}\log n)$. As our second contribution, we show that the SLC of any linear program is upper bounded by $2^{n + o(1)}$, which implies that our IPM's iteration complexity is at most exponential. This in contrast to existing iteration complexity bounds that depend on either bit-complexity or condition measures; these can be unbounded in the problem dimension. We achieve our upper bound by showing that the central path is well-approximated by a combinatorial proxy we call the \emph{max central path}, which consists of $2n$ shadow vertex simplex paths. Our upper bound complements the lower bounds of Allamigeon, Benchimol, Gaubert, and Joswig (SIAGA 2018), and Allamigeon, Gaubert, and Vandame (STOC 2022), who constructed linear programs with exponential SLC. Finally, we show that each iteration of our IPM can be implemented in strongly polynomial time. Along the way, we develop a deterministic algorithm that approximates the singular value decomposition of a matrix in strongly polynomial time to high accuracy, which may be of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 16 February, 2024; v1 submitted 17 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Integrality Gaps for Random Integer Programs via Discrepancy

Authors: Sander Borst, Daniel Dadush, Dan Mikulincer

Abstract: We prove new bounds on the additive gap between the value of a random integer program $\max c^Tx,\ Ax\leq b,\ x\in\{0,1\}^n$ with $m$ constraints and that of its linear programming relaxation for a wide range of distributions on $(A,b,c)$ . We are motivated by the work of Dey, Dubey, and Molinaro (SODA '21), who gave a framework for relating the size of Branch-and-Bound (B&B) trees to additive int… ▽ More We prove new bounds on the additive gap between the value of a random integer program $\max c^Tx,\ Ax\leq b,\ x\in\{0,1\}^n$ with $m$ constraints and that of its linear programming relaxation for a wide range of distributions on $(A,b,c)$ . We are motivated by the work of Dey, Dubey, and Molinaro (SODA '21), who gave a framework for relating the size of Branch-and-Bound (B&B) trees to additive integrality gaps. Dyer and Frieze (MOR '89) and Borst et al. (Mathematical Programming '22), respectively, showed that for certain random packing and Gaussian IPs, where the entries of $A,c$ are independently distributed according to either the uniform distribution on $[0,1]$ or the Gaussian distribution $\mathcal{N}(0,1)$, the integrality gap is bounded by $O_m(\log^2 n / n)$ with probability at least $1-1/n-e^{-Ω_m(1)}$. In this paper, we generalize these results to the case where the entries of $A$ are uniformly distributed on an integer interval (e.g., entries in $\{-1,0,1\}$), and where the columns of $A$ are distributed according to an isotropic logconcave distribution. Second, we substantially improve the success probability to $1-1/poly(n)$, compared to constant probability in prior works (depending on $m$). Leveraging the connection to Branch-and-Bound, our gap results imply that for these IPs B&B trees have size $n^{poly(m)}$ with high probability (i.e., polynomial for fixed $m$), which significantly extends the class of IPs for which B&B is known to be polynomial. Our main technical contribution is a new linear discrepancy theorem for random matrices. Our theorem gives general conditions under which a target vector is equal to or very close to a $\{0,1\}$ combination of the columns of a random matrix $A$ . The proof uses a Fourier analytic approach, building on work of Hoberg and Rothvoss (SODA '19) and Franks and Saks (RSA '20). △ Less

Submitted 11 April, 2023; v1 submitted 22 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Asymptotic Bounds on the Combinatorial Diameter of Random Polytopes

Authors: Gilles Bonnet, Daniel Dadush, Uri Grupel, Sophie Huiberts, Galyna Livshyts

Abstract: The combinatorial diameter $\operatorname{diam}(P)$ of a polytope $P$ is the maximum shortest path distance between any pair of vertices. In this paper, we provide upper and lower bounds on the combinatorial diameter of a random "spherical" polytope, which is tight to within one factor of dimension when the number of inequalities is large compared to the dimension. More precisely, for an $n$-dimen… ▽ More The combinatorial diameter $\operatorname{diam}(P)$ of a polytope $P$ is the maximum shortest path distance between any pair of vertices. In this paper, we provide upper and lower bounds on the combinatorial diameter of a random "spherical" polytope, which is tight to within one factor of dimension when the number of inequalities is large compared to the dimension. More precisely, for an $n$-dimensional polytope $P$ defined by the intersection of $m$ i.i.d.\ half-spaces whose normals are chosen uniformly from the sphere, we show that $\operatorname{diam}(P)$ is $Ω(n m^{\frac{1}{n-1}})$ and $O(n^2 m^{\frac{1}{n-1}} + n^5 4^n)$ with high probability when $m \geq 2^{Ω(n)}$. For the upper bound, we first prove that the number of vertices in any fixed two dimensional projection sharply concentrates around its expectation when $m$ is large, where we rely on the $Θ(n^2 m^{\frac{1}{n-1}})$ bound on the expectation due to Borgwardt [Math. Oper. Res., 1999]. To obtain the diameter upper bound, we stitch these ``shadows paths'' together over a suitable net using worst-case diameter bounds to connect vertices to the nearest shadow. For the lower bound, we first reduce to lower bounding the diameter of the dual polytope $P^\circ$, corresponding to a random convex hull, by showing the relation $\operatorname{diam}(P) \geq (n-1)(\operatorname{diam}(P^\circ)-2)$. We then prove that the shortest path between any ``nearly'' antipodal pair vertices of $P^\circ$ has length $Ω(m^{\frac{1}{n-1}})$. △ Less

Submitted 24 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: 29 pages, 2 figures

On Circuit Diameter Bounds via Circuit Imbalances

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Zhuan Khye Koh, Bento Natura, László A. Végh

Abstract: We study the circuit diameter of polyhedra, introduced by Borgwardt, Finhold, and Hemmecke (SIDMA 2015) as a relaxation of the combinatorial diameter. We show that the circuit diameter of a system $\{x \in \mathbb{R}^n: Ax=b, 0\leq x\leq u\}$ for $A \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$ is bounded by $O(m \min\{m, n-m\} \log(m+ κ_A)+n \log n)$, where $κ_A$ is the circuit imbalance measure of the constraint… ▽ More We study the circuit diameter of polyhedra, introduced by Borgwardt, Finhold, and Hemmecke (SIDMA 2015) as a relaxation of the combinatorial diameter. We show that the circuit diameter of a system $\{x \in \mathbb{R}^n: Ax=b, 0\leq x\leq u\}$ for $A \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$ is bounded by $O(m \min\{m, n-m\} \log(m+ κ_A)+n \log n)$, where $κ_A$ is the circuit imbalance measure of the constraint matrix. This yields a strongly polynomial circuit diameter bound if e.g., all entries of $A$ have polynomially bounded encoding length in $n$. Further, we present circuit augmentation algorithms for LPs using the minimum-ratio circuit cancelling rule. Even though the standard minimum-ratio circuit cancelling algorithm is not finite in general, our variant can solve an LP in $O(mn^2\log(n+κ_A))$ augmentation steps. △ Less

Submitted 12 June, 2024; v1 submitted 15 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

A New Framework for Matrix Discrepancy: Partial Coloring Bounds via Mirror Descent

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Haotian Jiang, Victor Reis

Abstract: Motivated by the Matrix Spencer conjecture, we study the problem of finding signed sums of matrices with a small matrix norm. A well-known strategy to obtain these signs is to prove, given matrices $A_1, \dots, A_n \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times m}$, a Gaussian measure lower bound of $2^{-O(n)}$ for a scaling of the discrepancy body $\{x \in \mathbb{R}^n: \| \sum_{i=1}^n x_i A_i\| \leq 1\}$. We show thi… ▽ More Motivated by the Matrix Spencer conjecture, we study the problem of finding signed sums of matrices with a small matrix norm. A well-known strategy to obtain these signs is to prove, given matrices $A_1, \dots, A_n \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times m}$, a Gaussian measure lower bound of $2^{-O(n)}$ for a scaling of the discrepancy body $\{x \in \mathbb{R}^n: \| \sum_{i=1}^n x_i A_i\| \leq 1\}$. We show this is equivalent to covering its polar with $2^{O(n)}$ translates of the cube $\frac{1}{n} B^n_\infty$, and construct such a cover via mirror descent. As applications of our framework, we show: $\bullet$ Matrix Spencer for Low-Rank Matrices. If the matrices satisfy $\|A_i\|_{\mathrm{op}} \leq 1$ and $\mathrm{rank}(A_i) \leq r$, we can efficiently find a coloring $x \in \{\pm 1\}^n$ with discrepancy $\|\sum_{i=1}^n x_i A_i \|_{\mathrm{op}} \lesssim \sqrt{n \log (\min(rm/n, r))}$. This improves upon the naive $O(\sqrt{n \log r})$ bound for random coloring and proves the matrix Spencer conjecture when $r m \leq n$. $\bullet$ Matrix Spencer for Block Diagonal Matrices. For block diagonal matrices with $\|A_i\|_{\mathrm{op}} \leq 1$ and block size $h$, we can efficiently find a coloring $x \in \{\pm 1\}^n$ with $\|\sum_{i=1}^n x_i A_i \|_{\mathrm{op}} \lesssim \sqrt{n \log (hm/n)}$. Using our proof, we reduce the matrix Spencer conjecture to the existence of a $O(\log(m/n))$ quantum relative entropy net on the spectraplex. $\bullet$ Matrix Discrepancy for Schatten Norms. We generalize our discrepancy bound for matrix Spencer to Schatten norms $2 \le p \leq q$. Given $\|A_i\|_{S_p} \leq 1$ and $\mathrm{rank}(A_i) \leq r$, we can efficiently find a partial coloring $x \in [-1,1]^n$ with $|\{i : |x_i| = 1\}| \ge n/2$ and $\|\sum_{i=1}^n x_i A_i\|_{S_q} \lesssim \sqrt{n \min(p, \log(rk))} \cdot k^{1/p-1/q}$, where $k := \min(1,m/n)$. △ Less

Submitted 4 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Comments: 24 pages

Majorizing Measures for the Optimizer

Authors: Sander Borst, Daniel Dadush, Neil Olver, Makrand Sinha

Abstract: The theory of majorizing measures, extensively developed by Fernique, Talagrand and many others, provides one of the most general frameworks for controlling the behavior of stochastic processes. In particular, it can be applied to derive quantitative bounds on the expected suprema and the degree of continuity of sample paths for many processes. One of the crowning achievements of the theory is T… ▽ More The theory of majorizing measures, extensively developed by Fernique, Talagrand and many others, provides one of the most general frameworks for controlling the behavior of stochastic processes. In particular, it can be applied to derive quantitative bounds on the expected suprema and the degree of continuity of sample paths for many processes. One of the crowning achievements of the theory is Talagrand's tight alternative characterization of the suprema of Gaussian processes in terms of majorizing measures. The proof of this theorem was difficult, and thus considerable effort was put into the task of develo** both shorter and easier to understand proofs. A major reason for this difficulty was considered to be theory of majorizing measures itself, which had the reputation of being opaque and mysterious. As a consequence, most recent treatments of the theory (including by Talagrand himself) have eschewed the use of majorizing measures in favor of a purely combinatorial approach (the generic chaining) where objects based on sequences of partitions provide roughly matching upper and lower bounds on the desired expected supremum. In this paper, we return to majorizing measures as a primary object of study, and give a viewpoint that we think is natural and clarifying from an optimization perspective. As our main contribution, we give an algorithmic proof of the majorizing measures theorem based on two parts: (1) We make the simple (but apparently new) observation that finding the best majorizing measure can be cast as a convex program. This also allows for efficiently computing the measure using off-the-shelf methods from convex optimization. (2) We obtain tree-based upper and lower bound certificates by rounding, in a series of steps, the primal and dual solutions to this convex program. [...] △ Less

Submitted 24 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: 37 pages. Extended Abstract to appear in ITCS 2021

MSC Class: 60G15; 68Q87 ACM Class: G.3

On the Integrality Gap of Binary Integer Programs with Gaussian Data

Authors: Sander Borst, Daniel Dadush, Sophie Huiberts, Samarth Tiwari

Abstract: For a binary integer program (IP) ${\rm max} ~ c^\mathsf{T} x, Ax \leq b, x \in \{0,1\}^n$, where $A \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$ and $c \in \mathbb{R}^n$ have independent Gaussian entries and the right-hand side $b \in \mathbb{R}^m$ satisfies that its negative coordinates have $\ell_2$ norm at most $n/10$, we prove that the gap between the value of the linear programming relaxation and the IP is… ▽ More For a binary integer program (IP) ${\rm max} ~ c^\mathsf{T} x, Ax \leq b, x \in \{0,1\}^n$, where $A \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$ and $c \in \mathbb{R}^n$ have independent Gaussian entries and the right-hand side $b \in \mathbb{R}^m$ satisfies that its negative coordinates have $\ell_2$ norm at most $n/10$, we prove that the gap between the value of the linear programming relaxation and the IP is upper bounded by $\operatorname{poly}(m)(\log n)^2 / n$ with probability at least $1-2/n^7-2^{-\operatorname{poly}(m)}$. Our results give a Gaussian analogue of the classical integrality gap result of Dyer and Frieze (Math. of O.R., 1989) in the case of random packing IPs. In constrast to the packing case, our integrality gap depends only polynomially on $m$ instead of exponentially. Building upon recent breakthrough work of Dey, Dubey and Molinaro (SODA, 2021), we show that the integrality gap implies that branch-and-bound requires $n^{\operatorname{poly}(m)}$ time on random Gaussian IPs with good probability, which is polynomial when the number of constraints $m$ is fixed. We derive this result via a novel meta-theorem, which relates the size of branch-and-bound trees and the integrality gap for random logconcave IPs. △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2021; v1 submitted 15 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

A Simple Method for Convex Optimization in the Oracle Model

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Christopher Hojny, Sophie Huiberts, Stefan Weltge

Abstract: We give a simple and natural method for computing approximately optimal solutions for minimizing a convex function $f$ over a convex set $K$ given by a separation oracle. Our method utilizes the Frank--Wolfe algorithm over the cone of valid inequalities of $K$ and subgradients of $f$. Under the assumption that $f$ is $L$-Lipschitz and that $K$ contains a ball of radius $r$ and is contained inside… ▽ More We give a simple and natural method for computing approximately optimal solutions for minimizing a convex function $f$ over a convex set $K$ given by a separation oracle. Our method utilizes the Frank--Wolfe algorithm over the cone of valid inequalities of $K$ and subgradients of $f$. Under the assumption that $f$ is $L$-Lipschitz and that $K$ contains a ball of radius $r$ and is contained inside the origin centered ball of radius $R$, using $O(\frac{(RL)^2}{\varepsilon^2} \cdot \frac{R^2}{r^2})$ iterations and calls to the oracle, our main method outputs a point $x \in K$ satisfying $f(x) \leq \varepsilon + \min_{z \in K} f(z)$. Our algorithm is easy to implement, and we believe it can serve as a useful alternative to existing cutting plane methods. As evidence towards this, we show that it compares favorably in terms of iteration counts to the standard LP based cutting plane method and the analytic center cutting plane method, on a testbed of combinatorial, semidefinite and machine learning instances. △ Less

Submitted 11 March, 2022; v1 submitted 17 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Comments: minor changes; to appear at IPCO 2022

Revisiting Tardos's Framework for Linear Programming: Faster Exact Solutions using Approximate Solvers

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Bento Natura, László A. Végh

Abstract: In breakthrough work, Tardos (Oper. Res. '86) gave a proximity based framework for solving linear programming (LP) in time depending only on the constraint matrix in the bit complexity model. In Tardos's framework, one reduces solving the LP $\min \langle c,{x}\rangle$, $Ax=b$, $x \geq 0$, $A \in \mathbb{Z}^{m \times n}$, to solving $O(nm)$ LPs in $A$ having small integer coefficient objectives an… ▽ More In breakthrough work, Tardos (Oper. Res. '86) gave a proximity based framework for solving linear programming (LP) in time depending only on the constraint matrix in the bit complexity model. In Tardos's framework, one reduces solving the LP $\min \langle c,{x}\rangle$, $Ax=b$, $x \geq 0$, $A \in \mathbb{Z}^{m \times n}$, to solving $O(nm)$ LPs in $A$ having small integer coefficient objectives and right-hand sides using any exact LP algorithm. This gives rise to an LP algorithm in time poly$(n,m\logΔ_A)$, where $Δ_A$ is the largest subdeterminant of $A$. A significant extension to the real model of computation was given by Vavasis and Ye (Math. Prog. '96), giving a specialized interior point method that runs in time poly$(n,m,\log\barχ_A)$, depending on Stewart's $\barχ_A$, a well-studied condition number. In this work, we extend Tardos's original framework to obtain such a running time dependence. In particular, we replace the exact LP solves with approximate ones, enabling us to directly leverage the tremendous recent algorithmic progress for approximate linear programming. More precisely, we show that the fundamental "accuracy" needed to exactly solve any LP in $A$ is inverse polynomial in $n$ and $\log\barχ_A$. Plugging in the recent algorithm of van den Brand (SODA '20), our method computes an optimal primal and dual solution using ${O}(m n^{ω+1} \log (n)\log(\barχ_A+n))$ arithmetic operations, outperforming the specialized interior point method of Vavasis and Ye and its recent improvement by Dadush et al (STOC '20). At a technical level, our framework combines together approximate LP solutions to compute exact ones, making use of constructive proximity theorems -- which bound the distance between solutions of "nearby" LPs -- to keep the required accuracy low. △ Less

Submitted 10 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

On the Complexity of Branching Proofs

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Samarth Tiwari

Abstract: We consider the task of proving integer infeasibility of a bounded convex $K$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$ using a general branching proof system. In a general branching proof, one constructs a branching tree by adding an integer disjunction $\mathbf{a} \mathbf{x} \leq b$ or $\mathbf{a} \mathbf{x} \geq b+1$, $\mathbf{a} \in \mathbb{Z}^n$, $b \in \mathbb{Z}$, at each node, such that the leaves of the tree cor… ▽ More We consider the task of proving integer infeasibility of a bounded convex $K$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$ using a general branching proof system. In a general branching proof, one constructs a branching tree by adding an integer disjunction $\mathbf{a} \mathbf{x} \leq b$ or $\mathbf{a} \mathbf{x} \geq b+1$, $\mathbf{a} \in \mathbb{Z}^n$, $b \in \mathbb{Z}$, at each node, such that the leaves of the tree correspond to empty sets (i.e., $K$ together with the inequalities picked up from the root to leaf is empty). Recently, Beame et al (ITCS 2018), asked whether the bit size of the coefficients in a branching proof, which they named stabbing planes (SP) refutations, for the case of polytopes derived from SAT formulas, can be assumed to be polynomial in $n$. We resolve this question by showing that any branching proof can be recompiled so that the integer disjunctions have coefficients of size at most $(n R)^{O(n^2)}$, where $R \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $K \in R \mathbb{B}_1^n$, while increasing the number of nodes in the branching tree by at most a factor $O(n)$. As our second contribution, we show that Tseitin formulas, an important class of infeasible SAT instances, have quasi-polynomial sized cutting plane (CP) refutations, disproving the conjecture that Tseitin formulas are (exponentially) hard for CP. As our final contribution, we give a simple family of polytopes in $[0,1]^n$ requiring branching proofs of length $2^n/n$. △ Less

Submitted 7 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

An Accelerated Newton-Dinkelbach Method and its Application to Two Variables Per Inequality Systems

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Zhuan Khye Koh, Bento Natura, László A. Végh

Abstract: We present an accelerated, or 'look-ahead' version of the Newton-Dinkelbach method, a well-known technique for solving fractional and parametric optimization problems. This acceleration halves the Bregman divergence between the current iterate and the optimal solution within every two iterations. Using the Bregman divergence as a potential in conjunction with combinatorial arguments, we obtain str… ▽ More We present an accelerated, or 'look-ahead' version of the Newton-Dinkelbach method, a well-known technique for solving fractional and parametric optimization problems. This acceleration halves the Bregman divergence between the current iterate and the optimal solution within every two iterations. Using the Bregman divergence as a potential in conjunction with combinatorial arguments, we obtain strongly polynomial algorithms in three applications domains: (i) For linear fractional combinatorial optimization, we show a convergence bound of $O(m \log m)$ iterations; the previous best bound was $O(m^2 \log m)$ by Wang et al. (2006). (ii) We obtain a strongly polynomial label-correcting algorithm for solving linear feasibility systems with two variables per inequality (2VPI). For a 2VPI system with $n$ variables and $m$ constraints, our algorithm runs in $O(mn)$ iterations. Every iteration takes $O(mn)$ time for general 2VPI systems, and $O(m + n \log n)$ time for the special case of deterministic Markov Decision Processes (DMDPs). This extends and strengthens a previous result by Madani (2002) that showed a weakly polynomial bound for a variant of the Newton-Dinkelbach method for solving DMDPs. (iii) We give a simplified variant of the parametric submodular function minimization result by Goemans et al. (2017). △ Less

Submitted 21 May, 2021; v1 submitted 18 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

A scaling-invariant algorithm for linear programming whose running time depends only on the constraint matrix

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Sophie Huiberts, Bento Natura, László A. Végh

Abstract: Following the breakthrough work of Tardos in the bit-complexity model, Vavasis and Ye gave the first exact algorithm for linear programming in the real model of computation with running time depending only on the constraint matrix. For solving a linear program (LP) $\max\, c^\top x,\: Ax = b,\: x \geq 0,\: A \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$, Vavasis and Ye developed a primal-dual interior point method… ▽ More Following the breakthrough work of Tardos in the bit-complexity model, Vavasis and Ye gave the first exact algorithm for linear programming in the real model of computation with running time depending only on the constraint matrix. For solving a linear program (LP) $\max\, c^\top x,\: Ax = b,\: x \geq 0,\: A \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$, Vavasis and Ye developed a primal-dual interior point method using a 'layered least squares' (LLS) step, and showed that $O(n^{3.5} \log (\barχ_A+n))$ iterations suffice to solve (LP) exactly, where $\barχ_A$ is a condition measure controlling the size of solutions to linear systems related to $A$. Monteiro and Tsuchiya, noting that the central path is invariant under rescalings of the columns of $A$ and $c$, asked whether there exists an LP algorithm depending instead on the measure $\barχ^*_A$, defined as the minimum $\barχ_{AD}$ value achievable by a column rescaling $AD$ of $A$, and gave strong evidence that this should be the case. We resolve this open question affirmatively. Our first main contribution is an $O(m^2 n^2 + n^3)$ time algorithm which works on the linear matroid of $A$ to compute a nearly optimal diagonal rescaling $D$ satisfying $\barχ_{AD} \leq n(\barχ^*)^3$. This algorithm also allows us to approximate the value of $\barχ_A$ up to a factor $n (\barχ^*)^2$. As our second main contribution, we develop a scaling invariant LLS algorithm, together with a refined potential function based analysis for LLS algorithms in general. With this analysis, we derive an improved $O(n^{2.5} \log n\log (\barχ^*_A+n))$ iteration bound for optimally solving (LP) using our algorithm. The same argument also yields a factor $n/\log n$ improvement on the iteration complexity bound of the original Vavasis-Ye algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 15 March, 2023; v1 submitted 12 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

Lattice-based Locality Sensitive Hashing is Optimal

Authors: Karthekeyan Chandrasekaran, Daniel Dadush, Venkata Gandikota, Elena Grigorescu

Abstract: Locality sensitive hashing (LSH) was introduced by Indyk and Motwani (STOC `98) to give the first sublinear time algorithm for the c-approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) problem using only polynomial space. At a high level, an LSH family hashes "nearby" points to the same bucket and "far away" points to different buckets. The quality of measure of an LSH family is its LSH exponent, which helps deter… ▽ More Locality sensitive hashing (LSH) was introduced by Indyk and Motwani (STOC `98) to give the first sublinear time algorithm for the c-approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) problem using only polynomial space. At a high level, an LSH family hashes "nearby" points to the same bucket and "far away" points to different buckets. The quality of measure of an LSH family is its LSH exponent, which helps determine both query time and space usage. In a seminal work, Andoni and Indyk (FOCS `06) constructed an LSH family based on random ball partitioning of space that achieves an LSH exponent of 1/c^2 for the l_2 norm, which was later shown to be optimal by Motwani, Naor and Panigrahy (SIDMA `07) and O'Donnell, Wu and Zhou (TOCT `14). Although optimal in the LSH exponent, the ball partitioning approach is computationally expensive. So, in the same work, Andoni and Indyk proposed a simpler and more practical hashing scheme based on Euclidean lattices and provided computational results using the 24-dimensional Leech lattice. However, no theoretical analysis of the scheme was given, thus leaving open the question of finding the exponent of lattice based LSH. In this work, we resolve this question by showing the existence of lattices achieving the optimal LSH exponent of 1/c^2 using techniques from the geometry of numbers. At a more conceptual level, our results show that optimal LSH space partitions can have periodic structure. Understanding the extent to which additional structure can be imposed on these partitions, e.g. to yield low space and query complexity, remains an important open problem. △ Less

Submitted 22 December, 2017; originally announced December 2017.

A Friendly Smoothed Analysis of the Simplex Method

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Sophie Huiberts

Abstract: Explaining the excellent practical performance of the simplex method for linear programming has been a major topic of research for over 50 years. One of the most successful frameworks for understanding the simplex method was given by Spielman and Teng (JACM `04), who developed the notion of smoothed analysis. Starting from an arbitrary linear program with $d$ variables and $n$ constraints, Spielma… ▽ More Explaining the excellent practical performance of the simplex method for linear programming has been a major topic of research for over 50 years. One of the most successful frameworks for understanding the simplex method was given by Spielman and Teng (JACM `04), who developed the notion of smoothed analysis. Starting from an arbitrary linear program with $d$ variables and $n$ constraints, Spielman and Teng analyzed the expected runtime over random perturbations of the LP (smoothed LP), where variance $σ^2$ Gaussian noise is added to the LP data. In particular, they gave a two-stage shadow vertex simplex algorithm which uses an expected $\widetilde{O}(d^{55} n^{86} σ^{-30})$ number of simplex pivots to solve the smoothed LP. Their analysis and runtime was substantially improved by Deshpande and Spielman (FOCS `05) and later Vershynin (SICOMP `09). The fastest current algorithm, due to Vershynin, solves the smoothed LP using an expected $O(d^3 σ^{-4} \log^3 n + d^9\log^7 n)$ number of pivots, improving the dependence on $n$ from polynomial to poly-logarithmic. While the original proof of Spielman and Teng has now been substantially simplified, the resulting analyses are still quite long and complex and the parameter dependencies far from optimal. In this work, we make substantial progress on this front, providing an improved and simpler analysis of shadow simplex methods, where our algorithm requires an expected \[ O(d^2 \sqrt{\log n} σ^{-2} + d^3 \log^{3/2} n) \] number of simplex pivots. We obtain our results via an improved \emph{shadow bound}, key to earlier analyses as well, combined with improvements on algorithmic techniques of Vershynin. As an added bonus, our analysis is completely modular, allowing us to obtain non-trivial bounds for perturbations beyond Gaussians, such as Laplace perturbations. △ Less

Submitted 11 June, 2019; v1 submitted 15 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Comments: Revision 4: an improved algorithm to strengthen the complexity bound in the large-noise regime

MSC Class: 52B99; 68Q87; 68W40

The Gram-Schmidt Walk: A Cure for the Banaszczyk Blues

Authors: Nikhil Bansal, Daniel Dadush, Shashwat Garg, Shachar Lovett

Abstract: An important result in discrepancy due to Banaszczyk states that for any set of $n$ vectors in $\mathbb{R}^m$ of $\ell_2$ norm at most $1$ and any convex body $K$ in $\mathbb{R}^m$ of Gaussian measure at least half, there exists a $\pm 1$ combination of these vectors which lies in $5K$. This result implies the best known bounds for several problems in discrepancy. Banaszczyk's proof of this result… ▽ More An important result in discrepancy due to Banaszczyk states that for any set of $n$ vectors in $\mathbb{R}^m$ of $\ell_2$ norm at most $1$ and any convex body $K$ in $\mathbb{R}^m$ of Gaussian measure at least half, there exists a $\pm 1$ combination of these vectors which lies in $5K$. This result implies the best known bounds for several problems in discrepancy. Banaszczyk's proof of this result is non-constructive and a major open problem has been to give an efficient algorithm to find such a $\pm 1$ combination of the vectors. In this paper, we resolve this question and give an efficient randomized algorithm to find a $\pm 1$ combination of the vectors which lies in $cK$ for $c>0$ an absolute constant. This leads to new efficient algorithms for several problems in discrepancy theory. △ Less

Submitted 3 August, 2017; originally announced August 2017.

AWGN-Goodness is Enough: Capacity-Achieving Lattice Codes based on Dithered Probabilistic Sha**

Authors: Antonio Campello, Daniel Dadush, Cong Ling

Abstract: In this paper we show that any sequence of infinite lattice constellations which is good for the unconstrained Gaussian channel can be shaped into a capacity-achieving sequence of codes for the power-constrained Gaussian channel under lattice decoding and non-uniform signalling. Unlike previous results in the literature, our scheme holds with no extra condition on the lattices (e.g. quantization-g… ▽ More In this paper we show that any sequence of infinite lattice constellations which is good for the unconstrained Gaussian channel can be shaped into a capacity-achieving sequence of codes for the power-constrained Gaussian channel under lattice decoding and non-uniform signalling. Unlike previous results in the literature, our scheme holds with no extra condition on the lattices (e.g. quantization-goodness or vanishing flatness factor), thus establishing a direct implication between AWGN-goodness, in the sense of Poltyrev, and capacity-achieving codes. Our analysis uses properties of the discrete Gaussian distribution in order to obtain precise bounds on the probability of error and achievable rates. In particular, we obtain a simple characterization of the finite-blocklength behavior of the scheme, showing that it approaches the optimal dispersion coefficient for \textit{high} signal-to-noise ratio. We further show that for \textit{low} signal-to-noise ratio the discrete Gaussian over centered lattice constellations can not achieve capacity, and thus a shift (or "dither") is essentially necessary. △ Less

Submitted 23 June, 2018; v1 submitted 20 July, 2017; originally announced July 2017.

Comments: 20 pages, 2 figures - added two sections (IV-C and IV-D) on finite dithers and reduced peak power

Geometric Rescaling Algorithms for Submodular Function Minimization

Authors: Daniel Dadush, László A. Végh, Giacomo Zambelli

Abstract: We present a new class of polynomial-time algorithms for submodular function minimization (SFM), as well as a unified framework to obtain strongly polynomial SFM algorithms. Our algorithms are based on simple iterative methods for the minimum-norm problem, such as the conditional gradient and Fujishige-Wolfe algorithms. We exhibit two techniques to turn simple iterative methods into polynomial-tim… ▽ More We present a new class of polynomial-time algorithms for submodular function minimization (SFM), as well as a unified framework to obtain strongly polynomial SFM algorithms. Our algorithms are based on simple iterative methods for the minimum-norm problem, such as the conditional gradient and Fujishige-Wolfe algorithms. We exhibit two techniques to turn simple iterative methods into polynomial-time algorithms. Firstly, we adapt the geometric rescaling technique, which has recently gained attention in linear programming, to SFM and obtain a weakly polynomial bound $O(({n}^4\cdot \textrm{EO} + {n}^5)\log ({n} L))$. Secondly, we exhibit a general combinatorial black-box approach to turn $\varepsilon L$-approximate SFM oracles into strongly polynomial exact SFM algorithms. This framework can be applied to a wide range of combinatorial and continuous algorithms, including pseudo-polynomial ones. In particular, we can obtain strongly polynomial algorithms by a repeated application of the conditional gradient or of the Fujishige-Wolfe algorithm. Combined with the geometric rescaling technique, the black-box approach provides an $O(({n}^5\cdot \textrm{EO} +{n}^6)\log^2{n})$ algorithm. Finally, we show that one of the techniques we develop in the paper can also be combined with the cutting-plane method of Lee, Sidford, and Wong \cite{LSW}, yielding a simplified variant of their $O(n^3 \log^2 n \cdot \textrm{EO} + n^4\log^{O(1)} n)$ algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 13 February, 2020; v1 submitted 17 July, 2017; originally announced July 2017.

Towards a Constructive Version of Banaszczyk's Vector Balancing Theorem

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Shashwat Garg, Shachar Lovett, Aleksandar Nikolov

Abstract: An important theorem of Banaszczyk (Random Structures & Algorithms `98) states that for any sequence of vectors of $\ell_2$ norm at most $1/5$ and any convex body $K$ of Gaussian measure $1/2$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$, there exists a signed combination of these vectors which lands inside $K$. A major open problem is to devise a constructive version of Banaszczyk's vector balancing theorem, i.e. to find a… ▽ More An important theorem of Banaszczyk (Random Structures & Algorithms `98) states that for any sequence of vectors of $\ell_2$ norm at most $1/5$ and any convex body $K$ of Gaussian measure $1/2$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$, there exists a signed combination of these vectors which lands inside $K$. A major open problem is to devise a constructive version of Banaszczyk's vector balancing theorem, i.e. to find an efficient algorithm which constructs the signed combination. We make progress towards this goal along several fronts. As our first contribution, we show an equivalence between Banaszczyk's theorem and the existence of $O(1)$-subgaussian distributions over signed combinations. For the case of symmetric convex bodies, our equivalence implies the existence of a universal signing algorithm (i.e. independent of the body), which simply samples from the subgaussian sign distribution and checks to see if the associated combination lands inside the body. For asymmetric convex bodies, we provide a novel recentering procedure, which allows us to reduce to the case where the body is symmetric. As our second main contribution, we show that the above framework can be efficiently implemented when the vectors have length $O(1/\sqrt{\log n})$, recovering Banaszczyk's results under this stronger assumption. More precisely, we use random walk techniques to produce the required $O(1)$-subgaussian signing distributions when the vectors have length $O(1/\sqrt{\log n})$, and use a stochastic gradient ascent method to implement the recentering procedure for asymmetric bodies. △ Less

Submitted 13 December, 2016; originally announced December 2016.

Rescaling Algorithms for Linear Conic Feasibility

Authors: Daniel Dadush, László A. Végh, Giacomo Zambelli

Abstract: We propose simple polynomial-time algorithms for two linear conic feasibility problems. For a matrix $A\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$, the kernel problem requires a positive vector in the kernel of $A$, and the image problem requires a positive vector in the image of $A^\top$. Both algorithms iterate between simple first order steps and rescaling steps. These rescalings improve natural geometric pote… ▽ More We propose simple polynomial-time algorithms for two linear conic feasibility problems. For a matrix $A\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$, the kernel problem requires a positive vector in the kernel of $A$, and the image problem requires a positive vector in the image of $A^\top$. Both algorithms iterate between simple first order steps and rescaling steps. These rescalings improve natural geometric potentials. If Goffin's condition measure $ρ_A$ is negative, then the kernel problem is feasible and the worst-case complexity of the kernel algorithm is $O\left((m^3n+mn^2)\log{|ρ_A|^{-1}}\right)$; if $ρ_A>0$, then the image problem is feasible and the image algorithm runs in time $O\left(m^2n^2\log{ρ_A^{-1}}\right)$. We also extend the image algorithm to the oracle setting. We address the degenerate case $ρ_A=0$ by extending our algorithms to find maximum support nonnegative vectors in the kernel of $A$ and in the image of $A^\top$. In this case the running time bounds are expressed in the bit-size model of computation: for an input matrix $A$ with integer entries and total encoding length $L$, the maximum support kernel algorithm runs in time $O\left((m^3n+mn^2)L\right)$, while the maximum support image algorithm runs in time $O\left(m^2n^2L\right)$. The standard linear programming feasibility problem can be easily reduced to either maximum support problems, yielding polynomial-time algorithms for Linear Programming. △ Less

Submitted 7 April, 2019; v1 submitted 19 November, 2016; originally announced November 2016.

Towards Strong Reverse Minkowski-type Inequalities for Lattices

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Oded Regev

Abstract: We present a natural reverse Minkowski-type inequality for lattices, which gives upper bounds on the number of lattice points in a Euclidean ball in terms of sublattice determinants, and conjecture its optimal form. The conjecture exhibits a surprising wealth of connections to various areas in mathematics and computer science, including a conjecture motivated by integer programming by Kannan and L… ▽ More We present a natural reverse Minkowski-type inequality for lattices, which gives upper bounds on the number of lattice points in a Euclidean ball in terms of sublattice determinants, and conjecture its optimal form. The conjecture exhibits a surprising wealth of connections to various areas in mathematics and computer science, including a conjecture motivated by integer programming by Kannan and Lovász (Annals of Math. 1988), a question from additive combinatorics asked by Green, a question on Brownian motions asked by Saloff-Coste (Colloq. Math. 2010), a theorem by Milman and Pisier from convex geometry (Ann. Probab. 1987), worst-case to average-case reductions in lattice-based cryptography, and more. We present these connections, provide evidence for the conjecture, and discuss possible approaches towards a proof. Our main technical contribution is in proving that our conjecture implies the $\ell_2$ case of the Kannan and Lovász conjecture. The proof relies on a novel convex relaxation for the covering radius, and a rounding procedure for based on "uncrossing" lattice subspaces. △ Less

Submitted 22 June, 2016; originally announced June 2016.

On the Lattice Distortion Problem

Authors: Huck Bennett, Daniel Dadush, Noah Stephens-Davidowitz

Abstract: We introduce and study the \emph{Lattice Distortion Problem} (LDP). LDP asks how "similar" two lattices are. I.e., what is the minimal distortion of a linear bijection between the two lattices? LDP generalizes the Lattice Isomorphism Problem (the lattice analogue of Graph Isomorphism), which simply asks whether the minimal distortion is one. As our first contribution, we show that the distortion… ▽ More We introduce and study the \emph{Lattice Distortion Problem} (LDP). LDP asks how "similar" two lattices are. I.e., what is the minimal distortion of a linear bijection between the two lattices? LDP generalizes the Lattice Isomorphism Problem (the lattice analogue of Graph Isomorphism), which simply asks whether the minimal distortion is one. As our first contribution, we show that the distortion between any two lattices is approximated up to a $n^{O(\log n)}$ factor by a simple function of their successive minima. Our methods are constructive, allowing us to compute low-distortion map**s that are within a $2^{O(n \log \log n/\log n)}$ factor of optimal in polynomial time and within a $n^{O(\log n)}$ factor of optimal in singly exponential time. Our algorithms rely on a notion of basis reduction introduced by Seysen (Combinatorica 1993), which we show is intimately related to lattice distortion. Lastly, we show that LDP is NP-hard to approximate to within any constant factor (under randomized reductions), by a reduction from the Shortest Vector Problem. △ Less

Submitted 30 October, 2016; v1 submitted 11 May, 2016; originally announced May 2016.

Comments: This is the full version of a paper that appeared in ESA 2016

An Algorithm for Komlós Conjecture Matching Banaszczyk's bound

Authors: Nikhil Bansal, Daniel Dadush, Shashwat Garg

Abstract: We consider the problem of finding a low discrepancy coloring for sparse set systems where each element lies in at most t sets. We give an efficient algorithm that finds a coloring with discrepancy O((t log n)^{1/2}), matching the best known non-constructive bound for the problem due to Banaszczyk. The previous algorithms only achieved an O(t^{1/2} log n) bound. The result also extends to the more… ▽ More We consider the problem of finding a low discrepancy coloring for sparse set systems where each element lies in at most t sets. We give an efficient algorithm that finds a coloring with discrepancy O((t log n)^{1/2}), matching the best known non-constructive bound for the problem due to Banaszczyk. The previous algorithms only achieved an O(t^{1/2} log n) bound. The result also extends to the more general Komlós setting and gives an algorithmic O(log^{1/2} n) bound. △ Less

Submitted 10 September, 2016; v1 submitted 10 May, 2016; originally announced May 2016.

Solving the Closest Vector Problem in $2^n$ Time--- The Discrete Gaussian Strikes Again!

Authors: Divesh Aggarwal, Daniel Dadush, Noah Stephens-Davidowitz

Abstract: We give a $2^{n+o(n)}$-time and space randomized algorithm for solving the exact Closest Vector Problem (CVP) on $n$-dimensional Euclidean lattices. This improves on the previous fastest algorithm, the deterministic $\widetilde{O}(4^{n})$-time and $\widetilde{O}(2^{n})$-space algorithm of Micciancio and Voulgaris. We achieve our main result in three steps. First, we show how to modify the sampli… ▽ More We give a $2^{n+o(n)}$-time and space randomized algorithm for solving the exact Closest Vector Problem (CVP) on $n$-dimensional Euclidean lattices. This improves on the previous fastest algorithm, the deterministic $\widetilde{O}(4^{n})$-time and $\widetilde{O}(2^{n})$-space algorithm of Micciancio and Voulgaris. We achieve our main result in three steps. First, we show how to modify the sampling algorithm from [ADRS15] to solve the problem of discrete Gaussian sampling over lattice shifts, $L- t$, with very low parameters. While the actual algorithm is a natural generalization of [ADRS15], the analysis uses substantial new ideas. This yields a $2^{n+o(n)}$-time algorithm for approximate CVP for any approximation factor $γ= 1+2^{-o(n/\log n)}$. Second, we show that the approximate closest vectors to a target vector $t$ can be grouped into "lower-dimensional clusters," and we use this to obtain a recursive reduction from exact CVP to a variant of approximate CVP that "behaves well with these clusters." Third, we show that our discrete Gaussian sampling algorithm can be used to solve this variant of approximate CVP. The analysis depends crucially on some new properties of the discrete Gaussian distribution and approximate closest vectors, which might be of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 28 September, 2015; v1 submitted 8 April, 2015; originally announced April 2015.

Journal ref: FOCS 2015

Solving the Shortest Vector Problem in $2^n$ Time via Discrete Gaussian Sampling

Authors: Divesh Aggarwal, Daniel Dadush, Oded Regev, Noah Stephens-Davidowitz

Abstract: We give a randomized $2^{n+o(n)}$-time and space algorithm for solving the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP) on n-dimensional Euclidean lattices. This improves on the previous fastest algorithm: the deterministic $\widetilde{O}(4^n)$-time and $\widetilde{O}(2^n)$-space algorithm of Micciancio and Voulgaris (STOC 2010, SIAM J. Comp. 2013). In fact, we give a conceptually simple algorithm that solves… ▽ More We give a randomized $2^{n+o(n)}$-time and space algorithm for solving the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP) on n-dimensional Euclidean lattices. This improves on the previous fastest algorithm: the deterministic $\widetilde{O}(4^n)$-time and $\widetilde{O}(2^n)$-space algorithm of Micciancio and Voulgaris (STOC 2010, SIAM J. Comp. 2013). In fact, we give a conceptually simple algorithm that solves the (in our opinion, even more interesting) problem of discrete Gaussian sampling (DGS). More specifically, we show how to sample $2^{n/2}$ vectors from the discrete Gaussian distribution at any parameter in $2^{n+o(n)}$ time and space. (Prior work only solved DGS for very large parameters.) Our SVP result then follows from a natural reduction from SVP to DGS. We also show that our DGS algorithm implies a $2^{n + o(n)}$-time algorithm that approximates the Closest Vector Problem to within a factor of $1.97$. In addition, we give a more refined algorithm for DGS above the so-called smoothing parameter of the lattice, which can generate $2^{n/2}$ discrete Gaussian samples in just $2^{n/2+o(n)}$ time and space. Among other things, this implies a $2^{n/2+o(n)}$-time and space algorithm for $1.93$-approximate decision SVP. △ Less

Submitted 15 September, 2015; v1 submitted 26 December, 2014; originally announced December 2014.

Journal ref: STOC 2015

On the Lattice Smoothing Parameter Problem

Authors: Kai-Min Chung, Daniel Dadush, Feng-Hao Liu, Chris Peikert

Abstract: The smoothing parameter $η_ε(\mathcal{L})$ of a Euclidean lattice $\mathcal{L}$, introduced by Micciancio and Regev (FOCS'04; SICOMP'07), is (informally) the smallest amount of Gaussian noise that "smooths out" the discrete structure of $\mathcal{L}$ (up to error $ε$). It plays a central role in the best known worst-case/average-case reductions for lattice problems, a wealth of lattice-based crypt… ▽ More The smoothing parameter $η_ε(\mathcal{L})$ of a Euclidean lattice $\mathcal{L}$, introduced by Micciancio and Regev (FOCS'04; SICOMP'07), is (informally) the smallest amount of Gaussian noise that "smooths out" the discrete structure of $\mathcal{L}$ (up to error $ε$). It plays a central role in the best known worst-case/average-case reductions for lattice problems, a wealth of lattice-based cryptographic constructions, and (implicitly) the tightest known transference theorems for fundamental lattice quantities. In this work we initiate a study of the complexity of approximating the smoothing parameter to within a factor $γ$, denoted $γ$-${\rm GapSPP}$. We show that (for $ε= 1/{\rm poly}(n)$): $(2+o(1))$-${\rm GapSPP} \in {\rm AM}$, via a Gaussian analogue of the classic Goldreich-Goldwasser protocol (STOC'98); $(1+o(1))$-${\rm GapSPP} \in {\rm coAM}$, via a careful application of the Goldwasser-Sipser (STOC'86) set size lower bound protocol to thin spherical shells; $(2+o(1))$-${\rm GapSPP} \in {\rm SZK} \subseteq {\rm AM} \cap {\rm coAM}$ (where ${\rm SZK}$ is the class of problems having statistical zero-knowledge proofs), by constructing a suitable instance-dependent commitment scheme (for a slightly worse $o(1)$-term); $(1+o(1))$-${\rm GapSPP}$ can be solved in deterministic $2^{O(n)} {\rm polylog}(1/ε)$ time and $2^{O(n)}$ space. As an application, we demonstrate a tighter worst-case to average-case reduction for basing cryptography on the worst-case hardness of the ${\rm GapSPP}$ problem, with $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ smaller approximation factor than the ${\rm GapSVP}$ problem. Central to our results are two novel, and nearly tight, characterizations of the magnitude of discrete Gaussian sums. △ Less

Submitted 26 December, 2014; originally announced December 2014.

On the Shadow Simplex Method for Curved Polyhedra

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Nicolai Hähnle

Abstract: We study the simplex method over polyhedra satisfying certain "discrete curvature" lower bounds, which enforce that the boundary always meets vertices at sharp angles. Motivated by linear programs with totally unimodular constraint matrices, recent results of Bonifas et al (SOCG 2012), Brunsch and Röglin (ICALP 2013), and Eisenbrand and Vempala (2014) have improved our understanding of such polyhe… ▽ More We study the simplex method over polyhedra satisfying certain "discrete curvature" lower bounds, which enforce that the boundary always meets vertices at sharp angles. Motivated by linear programs with totally unimodular constraint matrices, recent results of Bonifas et al (SOCG 2012), Brunsch and Röglin (ICALP 2013), and Eisenbrand and Vempala (2014) have improved our understanding of such polyhedra. We develop a new type of dual analysis of the shadow simplex method which provides a clean and powerful tool for improving all previously mentioned results. Our methods are inspired by the recent work of Bonifas and the first named author (SODA 2015), who analyzed a remarkably similar process as part of an algorithm for the Closest Vector Problem with Preprocessing. For our first result, we obtain a constructive diameter bound of $O(\frac{n^2}δ \ln \frac{n}δ)$ for $n$-dimensional polyhedra with curvature parameter $δ\in [0,1]$. For the class of polyhedra arising from totally unimodular constraint matrices, this implies a bound of $O(n^3 \ln n)$. For linear optimization, given an initial feasible vertex, we show that an optimal vertex can be found using an expected $O(\frac{n^3}δ \ln \frac{n}δ)$ simplex pivots, each requiring $O(m n)$ time to compute. An initial feasible solution can be found using $O(\frac{m n^3}δ \ln \frac{n}δ)$ pivot steps. △ Less

Submitted 20 December, 2014; originally announced December 2014.

Short Paths on the Voronoi Graph and the Closest Vector Problem with Preprocessing

Authors: Nicolas Bonifas, Daniel Dadush

Abstract: Improving on the Voronoi cell based techniques of Micciancio and Voulgaris (SIAM J. Comp. 13), and Sommer, Feder and Shalvi (SIAM J. Disc. Math. 09), we give a Las Vegas $\tilde{O}(2^n)$ expected time and space algorithm for CVPP (the preprocessing version of the Closest Vector Problem, CVP). This improves on the $\tilde{O}(4^n)$ deterministic runtime of the Micciancio Voulgaris algorithm, hencefo… ▽ More Improving on the Voronoi cell based techniques of Micciancio and Voulgaris (SIAM J. Comp. 13), and Sommer, Feder and Shalvi (SIAM J. Disc. Math. 09), we give a Las Vegas $\tilde{O}(2^n)$ expected time and space algorithm for CVPP (the preprocessing version of the Closest Vector Problem, CVP). This improves on the $\tilde{O}(4^n)$ deterministic runtime of the Micciancio Voulgaris algorithm, henceforth MV, for CVPP (which also solves CVP) at the cost of a polynomial amount of randomness (which only affects runtime, not correctness). As in MV, our algorithm proceeds by computing a short path on the Voronoi graph of the lattice, where lattice points are adjacent if their Voronoi cells share a common facet, from the origin to a closest lattice vector. Our main technical contribution is a randomized procedure that given the Voronoi relevant vectors of a lattice - the lattice vectors inducing facets of the Voronoi cell - as preprocessing and any "close enough" lattice point to the target, computes a path to a closest lattice vector of expected polynomial size. This improves on the $\tilde{O}(4^n)$ path length given by the MV algorithm. Furthermore, as in MV, each edge of the path can be computed using a single iteration over the Voronoi relevant vectors. As a byproduct of our work, we also give an optimal relationship between geometric and path distance on the Voronoi graph, which we believe to be of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 18 December, 2014; originally announced December 2014.

On the Closest Vector Problem with a Distance Guarantee

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Oded Regev, Noah Stephens-Davidowitz

Abstract: We present a substantially more efficient variant, both in terms of running time and size of preprocessing advice, of the algorithm by Liu, Lyubashevsky, and Micciancio for solving CVPP (the preprocessing version of the Closest Vector Problem, CVP) with a distance guarantee. For instance, for any $α< 1/2$, our algorithm finds the (unique) closest lattice point for any target point whose distance f… ▽ More We present a substantially more efficient variant, both in terms of running time and size of preprocessing advice, of the algorithm by Liu, Lyubashevsky, and Micciancio for solving CVPP (the preprocessing version of the Closest Vector Problem, CVP) with a distance guarantee. For instance, for any $α< 1/2$, our algorithm finds the (unique) closest lattice point for any target point whose distance from the lattice is at most $α$ times the length of the shortest nonzero lattice vector, requires as preprocessing advice only $N \approx \widetilde{O}(n \exp(α^2 n /(1-2α)^2))$ vectors, and runs in time $\widetilde{O}(nN)$. As our second main contribution, we present reductions showing that it suffices to solve CVP, both in its plain and preprocessing versions, when the input target point is within some bounded distance of the lattice. The reductions are based on ideas due to Kannan and a recent sparsification technique due to Dadush and Kun. Combining our reductions with the LLM algorithm gives an approximation factor of $O(n/\sqrt{\log n})$ for search CVPP, improving on the previous best of $O(n^{1.5})$ due to Lagarias, Lenstra, and Schnorr. When combined with our improved algorithm we obtain, somewhat surprisingly, that only O(n) vectors of preprocessing advice are sufficient to solve CVPP with (the only slightly worse) approximation factor of O(n). △ Less

Submitted 25 December, 2014; v1 submitted 29 September, 2014; originally announced September 2014.

Comments: An early version of the paper was titled "On Bounded Distance Decoding and the Closest Vector Problem with Preprocessing". Conference on Computational Complexity (2014)

Journal ref: CCC 2014

A Deterministic Polynomial Space Construction for eps-nets under any Norm

Authors: Daniel Dadush

Abstract: We give a deterministic polynomial space construction for nearly optimal eps-nets with respect to any input n-dimensional convex body K and norm |.|. More precisely, our algorithm can build and iterate over an eps-net of K with respect to |.| in time 2^O(n) x (size of the optimal net) using only poly(n)-space. This improves on previous constructions of Alon et al [STOC 2013] which achieve either a… ▽ More We give a deterministic polynomial space construction for nearly optimal eps-nets with respect to any input n-dimensional convex body K and norm |.|. More precisely, our algorithm can build and iterate over an eps-net of K with respect to |.| in time 2^O(n) x (size of the optimal net) using only poly(n)-space. This improves on previous constructions of Alon et al [STOC 2013] which achieve either a 2^O(n) approximation or an n^O(n) approximation of the optimal net size using 2^n space and poly(n)-space respectively. As in their work, our algorithm relies on the mathematically classical approach of building thin lattice coverings of space, which reduces the task of constructing eps-nets to the problem of enumerating lattice points. Our main technical contribution is a deterministic 2^O(n)-time and poly(n)-space construction of thin lattice coverings of space with respect to any convex body, where enumeration in these lattices can be efficiently performed using poly(n)-space. This also yields the first existential construction of poly(n)-space enumerable thin covering lattices for general convex bodies, which we believe is of independent interest. Our construction combines the use of the M-ellipsoid from convex geometry with lattice sparsification and densification techniques. As an application, we give a 2^O(n)(1+1/eps)^n time and poly(n)-space deterministic algorithm for computing a (1+eps)^n approximation to the volume of a general convex body, which nearly matches the lower bounds for volume estimation in the oracle model (the dependence on eps is larger by a factor 2 in the exponent). This improves on the previous results of Dadush and Vempala [PNAS 2013], which gave the above result only for symmetric bodies and achieved a dependence on eps of (1+log^{5/2}(1/eps)/eps^2)^n. △ Less

Submitted 3 December, 2013; v1 submitted 26 November, 2013; originally announced November 2013.

On the existence of 0/1 polytopes with high semidefinite extension complexity

Authors: Jop Briët, Daniel Dadush, Sebastian Pokutta

Abstract: In Rothvoß it was shown that there exists a 0/1 polytope (a polytope whose vertices are in \{0,1\}^{n}) such that any higher-dimensional polytope projecting to it must have 2^{Ω(n)} facets, i.e., its linear extension complexity is exponential. The question whether there exists a 0/1 polytope with high PSD extension complexity was left open. We answer this question in the affirmative by showing tha… ▽ More In Rothvoß it was shown that there exists a 0/1 polytope (a polytope whose vertices are in \{0,1\}^{n}) such that any higher-dimensional polytope projecting to it must have 2^{Ω(n)} facets, i.e., its linear extension complexity is exponential. The question whether there exists a 0/1 polytope with high PSD extension complexity was left open. We answer this question in the affirmative by showing that there is a 0/1 polytope such that any spectrahedron projecting to it must be the intersection of a semidefinite cone of dimension~2^{Ω(n)} and an affine space. Our proof relies on a new technique to rescale semidefinite factorizations. △ Less

Submitted 2 December, 2013; v1 submitted 14 May, 2013; originally announced May 2013.

MSC Class: 90C05; 68W25; 90C60

Lattice Sparsification and the Approximate Closest Vector Problem

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Gabor Kun

Abstract: We give a deterministic algorithm for solving the (1+eps)-approximate Closest Vector Problem (CVP) on any n dimensional lattice and any norm in 2^{O(n)}(1+1/eps)^n time and 2^n poly(n) space. Our algorithm builds on the lattice point enumeration techniques of Micciancio and Voulgaris (STOC 2010) and Dadush, Peikert and Vempala (FOCS 2011), and gives an elegant, deterministic alternative to the "AK… ▽ More We give a deterministic algorithm for solving the (1+eps)-approximate Closest Vector Problem (CVP) on any n dimensional lattice and any norm in 2^{O(n)}(1+1/eps)^n time and 2^n poly(n) space. Our algorithm builds on the lattice point enumeration techniques of Micciancio and Voulgaris (STOC 2010) and Dadush, Peikert and Vempala (FOCS 2011), and gives an elegant, deterministic alternative to the "AKS Sieve" based algorithms for (1+eps)-CVP (Ajtai, Kumar, and Sivakumar; STOC 2001 and CCC 2002). Furthermore, assuming the existence of a poly(n)-space and 2^{O(n)} time algorithm for exact CVP in the l_2 norm, the space complexity of our algorithm can be reduced to polynomial. Our main technical contribution is a method for "sparsifying" any input lattice while approximately maintaining its metric structure. To this end, we employ the idea of random sublattice restrictions, which was first employed by Khot (FOCS 2003) for the purpose of proving hardness for Shortest Vector Problem (SVP) under l_p norms. △ Less

Submitted 30 December, 2012; originally announced December 2012.

Near-Optimal Deterministic Algorithms for Volume Computation and Lattice Problems via M-Ellipsoids

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Santosh Vempala

Abstract: We give a deterministic 2^{O(n)} algorithm for computing an M-ellipsoid of a convex body, matching a known lower bound. This has several interesting consequences including improved deterministic algorithms for volume estimation of convex bodies and the shortest and closest lattice vector problems under general norms. We give a deterministic 2^{O(n)} algorithm for computing an M-ellipsoid of a convex body, matching a known lower bound. This has several interesting consequences including improved deterministic algorithms for volume estimation of convex bodies and the shortest and closest lattice vector problems under general norms. △ Less

Submitted 3 July, 2012; v1 submitted 28 January, 2012; originally announced January 2012.

MSC Class: 52C07; 68Q25

A O(1/eps^2)^n Time Sieving Algorithm for Approximate Integer Programming

Authors: Daniel Dadush

Abstract: The Integer Programming Problem (IP) for a polytope P \subseteq R^n is to find an integer point in P or decide that P is integer free. We give an algorithm for an approximate version of this problem, which correctly decides whether P contains an integer point or whether a (1+\eps) scaling of P around its barycenter is integer free in time O(1/\eps^2)^n. We reduce this approximate IP question to an… ▽ More The Integer Programming Problem (IP) for a polytope P \subseteq R^n is to find an integer point in P or decide that P is integer free. We give an algorithm for an approximate version of this problem, which correctly decides whether P contains an integer point or whether a (1+\eps) scaling of P around its barycenter is integer free in time O(1/\eps^2)^n. We reduce this approximate IP question to an approximate Closest Vector Problem (CVP) in a "near-symmetric" semi-norm, which we solve via a sieving technique first developed by Ajtai, Kumar, and Sivakumar (STOC 2001). Our main technical contribution is an extension of the AKS sieving technique which works for any near-symmetric semi-norm. Our results also extend to general convex bodies and lattices. △ Less

Submitted 29 September, 2011; v1 submitted 12 September, 2011; originally announced September 2011.

Deterministic Construction of an Approximate M-Ellipsoid and its Application to Derandomizing Lattice Algorithms

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Santosh Vempala

Abstract: We give a deterministic O(log n)^n algorithm for the {\em Shortest Vector Problem (SVP)} of a lattice under {\em any} norm, improving on the previous best deterministic bound of n^O(n) for general norms and nearly matching the bound of 2^O(n) for the standard Euclidean norm established by Micciancio and Voulgaris (STOC 2010). Our algorithm can be viewed as a derandomization of the AKS randomized s… ▽ More We give a deterministic O(log n)^n algorithm for the {\em Shortest Vector Problem (SVP)} of a lattice under {\em any} norm, improving on the previous best deterministic bound of n^O(n) for general norms and nearly matching the bound of 2^O(n) for the standard Euclidean norm established by Micciancio and Voulgaris (STOC 2010). Our algorithm can be viewed as a derandomization of the AKS randomized sieve algorithm, which can be used to solve SVP for any norm in 2^O(n) time with high probability. We use the technique of covering a convex body by ellipsoids, as introduced for lattice problems in (Dadush et al., FOCS 2011). Our main contribution is a deterministic approximation of an M-ellipsoid of any convex body. We achieve this via a convex programming formulation of the optimal ellipsoid with the objective function being an n-dimensional integral that we show can be approximated deterministically, a technique that appears to be of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 27 July, 2011; originally announced July 2011.

MSC Class: 52C07; 68Q25

Enumerative Lattice Algorithms in Any Norm via M-Ellipsoid Coverings

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Chris Peikert, Santosh Vempala

Abstract: We give a novel algorithm for enumerating lattice points in any convex body, and give applications to several classic lattice problems, including the Shortest and Closest Vector Problems (SVP and CVP, respectively) and Integer Programming (IP). Our enumeration technique relies on a classical concept from asymptotic convex geometry known as the M-ellipsoid, and uses as a crucial subroutine the rece… ▽ More We give a novel algorithm for enumerating lattice points in any convex body, and give applications to several classic lattice problems, including the Shortest and Closest Vector Problems (SVP and CVP, respectively) and Integer Programming (IP). Our enumeration technique relies on a classical concept from asymptotic convex geometry known as the M-ellipsoid, and uses as a crucial subroutine the recent algorithm of Micciancio and Voulgaris (STOC 2010) for lattice problems in the l_2 norm. As a main technical contribution, which may be of independent interest, we build on the techniques of Klartag (Geometric and Functional Analysis, 2006) to give an expected 2^O(n)-time algorithm for computing an M-ellipsoid for any n-dimensional convex body. As applications, we give deterministic 2^{O(n)}-time and -space algorithms for solving exact SVP, and exact CVP when the target point is sufficiently close to the lattice, on n-dimensional lattices in any (semi-)norm given an M-ellipsoid of the unit ball. In many norms of interest, including all l_p norms, an M-ellipsoid is computable in deterministic poly(n) time, in which case these algorithms are fully deterministic. Here our approach may be seen as a derandomization of the "AKS sieve" for exact SVP and CVP (Ajtai, Kumar, and Sivakumar; STOC 2001 and CCC 2002). As a further application of our SVP algorithm, we derive an expected O(f*(n))^n-time algorithm for Integer Programming, where f*(n) denotes the optimal bound in the so-called "flatness theorem," which satisfies f*(n) = O(n^{4/3} \polylog(n)) and is conjectured to be f*(n)=Θ(n). Our runtime improves upon the previous best of O(n^{2})^{n} by Hildebrand and Koppe (2010). △ Less

Submitted 12 June, 2011; v1 submitted 25 November, 2010; originally announced November 2010.

On the Chvatal-Gomory Closure of a Compact Convex Set

Authors: Daniel Dadush, Santanu S. Dey, Juan Pablo Vielma

Abstract: In this paper, we show that the Chvatal-Gomory closure of a compact convex set is a rational polytope. This resolves an open question discussed in Schrijver [Schrijver 80'] and generalizes the same result for the case of rational polytopes [Schrijver 80'], rational ellipsoids [Dey-Vielma 10'] and strictly convex sets [Dadush-Dey-Vielma 10']. In particular, it shows that the CG closure of an irrati… ▽ More In this paper, we show that the Chvatal-Gomory closure of a compact convex set is a rational polytope. This resolves an open question discussed in Schrijver [Schrijver 80'] and generalizes the same result for the case of rational polytopes [Schrijver 80'], rational ellipsoids [Dey-Vielma 10'] and strictly convex sets [Dadush-Dey-Vielma 10']. In particular, it shows that the CG closure of an irrational polytope is a rational polytope, which was the open question in [Schrijver 80']. △ Less

Submitted 7 November, 2010; originally announced November 2010.

Thin Partitions: Isoperimetric Inequalities and Sampling Algorithms for some Nonconvex Families

Authors: Karthekeyan Chandrasekaran, Daniel Dadush, Santosh Vempala

Abstract: Star-shaped bodies are an important nonconvex generalization of convex bodies (e.g., linear programming with violations). Here we present an efficient algorithm for sampling a given star-shaped body. The complexity of the algorithm grows polynomially in the dimension and inverse polynomially in the fraction of the volume taken up by the kernel of the star-shaped body. The analysis is based on a… ▽ More Star-shaped bodies are an important nonconvex generalization of convex bodies (e.g., linear programming with violations). Here we present an efficient algorithm for sampling a given star-shaped body. The complexity of the algorithm grows polynomially in the dimension and inverse polynomially in the fraction of the volume taken up by the kernel of the star-shaped body. The analysis is based on a new isoperimetric inequality. Our main technical contribution is a tool for proving such inequalities when the domain is not convex. As a consequence, we obtain a polynomial algorithm for computing the volume of such a set as well. In contrast, linear optimization over star-shaped sets is NP-hard. △ Less

Submitted 3 April, 2009; originally announced April 2009.

ACM Class: F.2.2