-
Time and Space Measures for a Complete Graph Computation Model
Authors:
Brian Courtehoute,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
We present a computation model based on a subclass of GP 2 graph programs which can simulate any off-line Turing machine of space complexity O(s(n) log s(n)) in space O(s(n)). The simulation only requires a quadratic time overhead. Our model shares this property with Schönhage's storage modification machines and Kolmogorov-Uspenskii machines. These machines use low-level pointer instructions where…
▽ More
We present a computation model based on a subclass of GP 2 graph programs which can simulate any off-line Turing machine of space complexity O(s(n) log s(n)) in space O(s(n)). The simulation only requires a quadratic time overhead. Our model shares this property with Schönhage's storage modification machines and Kolmogorov-Uspenskii machines. These machines use low-level pointer instructions whereas our GP 2-based model uses pattern-based transformation rules and high-level control constructs.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
A Small-Step Operational Semantics for GP 2
Authors:
Brian Courtehoute,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
The operational semantics of a programming language is said to be small-step if each transition step is an atomic computation step in the language. A semantics with this property faithfully corresponds to the implementation of the language. The previous semantics of the graph programming language GP 2 is not fully small-step because the loop and branching commands are defined in big-step style. In…
▽ More
The operational semantics of a programming language is said to be small-step if each transition step is an atomic computation step in the language. A semantics with this property faithfully corresponds to the implementation of the language. The previous semantics of the graph programming language GP 2 is not fully small-step because the loop and branching commands are defined in big-step style. In this paper, we present a truly small-step operational semantics for GP 2 which, in particular, accurately models diverging computations. To obtain small-step definitions of all commands, we equip the transition relation with a stack of host graphs and associated operations. We prove that the new semantics is non-blocking in that every computation either diverges or eventually produces a result graph or the failure state. We also show the finite nondeterminism property, viz. that each configuration has only a finite number of direct successors. The previous semantics of GP 2 is neither non-blocking nor does it have the finite nondeterminism property. We also show that, for a program and a graph that terminate, both semantics are equivalent, and that the old semantics can be simulated with the new one.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Fast Rule-Based Graph Programs
Authors:
Graham Campbell,
Brian Courtehoute,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
Implementing graph algorithms efficiently in a rule-based language is challenging because graph pattern matching is expensive. In this paper, we present a number of linear-time implementations of graph algorithms in GP 2, an experimental programming language based on graph transformation rules which aims to facilitate program analysis and verification. We focus on two classes of rule-based graph p…
▽ More
Implementing graph algorithms efficiently in a rule-based language is challenging because graph pattern matching is expensive. In this paper, we present a number of linear-time implementations of graph algorithms in GP 2, an experimental programming language based on graph transformation rules which aims to facilitate program analysis and verification. We focus on two classes of rule-based graph programs: graph reduction programs which check some graph property, and programs using a depth-first search to test some property or perform an operation such as producing a 2-colouring or a topological sorting. Programs of the first type run in linear time without any constraints on input graphs while programs of the second type require input graphs of bounded degree to run in linear time. Essential for achieving the linear time complexity are so-called rooted rules in GP 2, which, in many situations, can be matched in constant time. For each of our programs, we prove both correctness and complexity, and also give empirical evidence for their run time.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2021; v1 submitted 21 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
A Fast Graph Program for Computing Minimum Spanning Trees
Authors:
Brian Courtehoute,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
When using graph transformation rules to implement graph algorithms, a challenge is to match the efficiency of programs in conventional languages. To help overcome that challenge, the graph programming language GP 2 features rooted rules which, under mild conditions, can match in constant time on bounded degree graphs. In this paper, we present an efficient GP 2 program for computing minimum spann…
▽ More
When using graph transformation rules to implement graph algorithms, a challenge is to match the efficiency of programs in conventional languages. To help overcome that challenge, the graph programming language GP 2 features rooted rules which, under mild conditions, can match in constant time on bounded degree graphs. In this paper, we present an efficient GP 2 program for computing minimum spanning trees. We provide empirical performance results as evidence for the program's subquadratic complexity on bounded degree graphs. This is achieved using depth-first search as well as rooted graph transformation. The program is based on Boruvka's algorithm for minimum spanning trees. Our performance results show that the program's time complexity is consistent with that of classical implementations of Boruvka's algorithm, namely O(m log n), where m is the number of edges and n the number of nodes.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
