-
An efficient preconditioner for the fast simulation of a 2D Stokes flow in porous media
Authors:
Pieter Coulier,
Bryan Quaife,
Eric Darve
Abstract:
We consider an efficient preconditioner for boundary integral equation (BIE) formulations of the two-dimensional Stokes equations in porous media. While BIEs are well-suited for resolving the complex porous geometry, they lead to a dense linear system of equations that is computationally expensive to solve for large problems. This expense is further amplified when a significant number of iteration…
▽ More
We consider an efficient preconditioner for boundary integral equation (BIE) formulations of the two-dimensional Stokes equations in porous media. While BIEs are well-suited for resolving the complex porous geometry, they lead to a dense linear system of equations that is computationally expensive to solve for large problems. This expense is further amplified when a significant number of iterations is required in an iterative Krylov solver such as GMRES. In this paper, we apply a fast inexact direct solver, the inverse fast multipole method (IFMM), as an efficient preconditioner for GMRES. This solver is based on the framework of $\mathcal{H}^{2}$-matrices and uses low-rank compressions to approximate certain matrix blocks. It has a tunable accuracy $\varepsilon$ and a computational cost that scales as $\mathcal{O} (N \log^2 1/\varepsilon)$. We discuss various numerical benchmarks that validate the accuracy and confirm the efficiency of the proposed method. We demonstrate with several types of boundary conditions that the preconditioner is capable of significantly accelerating the convergence of GMRES when compared to a simple block-diagonal preconditioner, especially for pipe flow problems involving many pores.
△ Less
Submitted 14 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
Fast hierarchical solvers for sparse matrices using extended sparsification and low-rank approximation
Authors:
Hadi Pouransari,
Pieter Coulier,
Eric Darve
Abstract:
Inversion of sparse matrices with standard direct solve schemes is robust, but computationally expensive. Iterative solvers, on the other hand, demonstrate better scalability; but, need to be used with an appropriate preconditioner (e.g., ILU, AMG, Gauss-Seidel, etc.) for proper convergence. The choice of an effective preconditioner is highly problem dependent. We propose a novel fully algebraic s…
▽ More
Inversion of sparse matrices with standard direct solve schemes is robust, but computationally expensive. Iterative solvers, on the other hand, demonstrate better scalability; but, need to be used with an appropriate preconditioner (e.g., ILU, AMG, Gauss-Seidel, etc.) for proper convergence. The choice of an effective preconditioner is highly problem dependent. We propose a novel fully algebraic sparse matrix solve algorithm, which has linear complexity with the problem size. Our scheme is based on the Gauss elimination. For a given matrix, we approximate the LU factorization with a tunable accuracy determined a priori. This method can be used as a stand-alone direct solver with linear complexity and tunable accuracy, or it can be used as a black-box preconditioner in conjunction with iterative methods such as GMRES. The proposed solver is based on the low-rank approximation of fill-ins generated during the elimination. Similar to H-matrices, fill-ins corresponding to blocks that are well-separated in the adjacency graph are represented via a hierarchical structure. The linear complexity of the algorithm is guaranteed if the blocks corresponding to well-separated clusters of variables are numerically low-rank.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2016; v1 submitted 26 October, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
-
The inverse fast multipole method: using a fast approximate direct solver as a preconditioner for dense linear systems
Authors:
Pieter Coulier,
Hadi Pouransari,
Eric Darve
Abstract:
Although some preconditioners are available for solving dense linear systems, there are still many matrices for which preconditioners are lacking, in particular in cases where the size of the matrix $N$ becomes very large. There remains hence a great need to develop general purpose preconditioners whose cost scales well with the matrix size $N$. In this paper, we propose a preconditioner with broa…
▽ More
Although some preconditioners are available for solving dense linear systems, there are still many matrices for which preconditioners are lacking, in particular in cases where the size of the matrix $N$ becomes very large. There remains hence a great need to develop general purpose preconditioners whose cost scales well with the matrix size $N$. In this paper, we propose a preconditioner with broad applicability and with cost $\mathcal{O}(N)$ for dense matrices, when the matrix is given by a smooth kernel. Extending the method using the same framework to general $\mathcal{H}^2$-matrices is relatively straightforward. These preconditioners have a controlled accuracy (machine accuracy can be achieved if needed) and scale linearly with $N$. They are based on an approximate direct solve of the system. The linear scaling of the algorithm is achieved by means of two key ideas. First, the $\mathcal{H}^2$-structure of the dense matrix is exploited to obtain an extended sparse system of equations. Second, fill-ins arising when performing the elimination are compressed as low-rank matrices if they correspond to well-separated interactions. This ensures that the sparsity pattern of the extended sparse matrix is preserved throughout the elimination, hence resulting in a very efficient algorithm with $\mathcal{O}(N \log(1/\varepsilon)^2 )$ computational cost and $\mathcal{O}(N \log 1/\varepsilon )$ memory requirement, for an error tolerance $0 < \varepsilon < 1$. The solver is inexact, although the error can be controlled and made as small as needed. These solvers are related to ILU in the sense that the fill-in is controlled. However, in ILU, most of the fill-in is simply discarded whereas here it is approximated using low-rank blocks, with a prescribed tolerance. Numerical examples are discussed to demonstrate the linear scaling of the method and to illustrate its effectiveness as a preconditioner.
△ Less
Submitted 4 February, 2016; v1 submitted 7 August, 2015;
originally announced August 2015.
