-
Measuring and Controlling Divisiveness in Rank Aggregation
Authors:
Rachael Colley,
Umberto Grandi,
César Hidalgo,
Mariana Macedo,
Carlos Navarrete
Abstract:
In rank aggregation, members of a population rank issues to decide which are collectively preferred. We focus instead on identifying divisive issues that express disagreements among the preferences of individuals. We analyse the properties of our divisiveness measures and their relation to existing notions of polarisation. We also study their robustness under incomplete preferences and algorithms…
▽ More
In rank aggregation, members of a population rank issues to decide which are collectively preferred. We focus instead on identifying divisive issues that express disagreements among the preferences of individuals. We analyse the properties of our divisiveness measures and their relation to existing notions of polarisation. We also study their robustness under incomplete preferences and algorithms for control and manipulation of divisiveness. Our results advance our understanding of how to quantify disagreements in collective decision-making.
△ Less
Submitted 14 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Selecting Representative Bodies: An Axiomatic View
Authors:
Manon Revel,
Niclas Boehmer,
Rachael Colley,
Markus Brill,
Piotr Faliszewski,
Edith Elkind
Abstract:
As the world's democratic institutions are challenged by dissatisfied citizens, political scientists and also computer scientists have proposed and analyzed various (innovative) methods to select representative bodies, a crucial task in every democracy. However, a unified framework to analyze and compare different selection mechanisms is missing, resulting in very few comparative works. To address…
▽ More
As the world's democratic institutions are challenged by dissatisfied citizens, political scientists and also computer scientists have proposed and analyzed various (innovative) methods to select representative bodies, a crucial task in every democracy. However, a unified framework to analyze and compare different selection mechanisms is missing, resulting in very few comparative works. To address this gap, we advocate employing concepts and tools from computational social choice in order to devise a model in which different selection mechanisms can be formalized. Such a model would allow for desirable representation axioms to be conceptualized and evaluated. We make the first step in this direction by proposing a unifying mathematical formulation of different selection mechanisms as well as various social-choice-inspired axioms such as proportionality and monotonicity.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Measuring a Priori Voting Power -- Taking Delegations Seriously
Authors:
Rachael Colley,
Théo Delemazure,
Hugo Gilbert
Abstract:
We introduce new power indices to measure the a priori voting power of voters in liquid democracy elections where an underlying network restricts delegations. We argue that our power indices are natural extensions of the standard Penrose-Banzhaf index in simple voting games. We show that computing the criticality of a voter is #P-hard even when voting weights are polynomially-bounded in the size o…
▽ More
We introduce new power indices to measure the a priori voting power of voters in liquid democracy elections where an underlying network restricts delegations. We argue that our power indices are natural extensions of the standard Penrose-Banzhaf index in simple voting games. We show that computing the criticality of a voter is #P-hard even when voting weights are polynomially-bounded in the size of the instance. However, for specific settings, such as when the underlying network is a bipartite or complete graph, recursive formulas can compute these indices for weighted voting games in pseudo-polynomial time. We highlight their theoretical properties and provide numerical results to illustrate how restricting the possible delegations can alter voters' voting power.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2023; v1 submitted 6 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Understanding Political Divisiveness using Online Participation data from the 2022 French and Brazilian Presidential Elections
Authors:
Carlos Navarrete,
Mariana Macedo,
Rachael Colley,
**gling Zhang,
Nicole Ferrada,
Maria Eduarda Mello,
Rodrigo Lira,
Carmelo Bastos-Filho,
Umberto Grandi,
Jerome Lang,
César A. Hidalgo
Abstract:
Digital technologies can augment civic participation by facilitating the expression of detailed political preferences. Yet, digital participation efforts often rely on methods optimized for elections involving a few candidates. Here we present data collected in an online experiment where participants built personalized government programs by combining policies proposed by the candidates of the 202…
▽ More
Digital technologies can augment civic participation by facilitating the expression of detailed political preferences. Yet, digital participation efforts often rely on methods optimized for elections involving a few candidates. Here we present data collected in an online experiment where participants built personalized government programs by combining policies proposed by the candidates of the 2022 French and Brazilian presidential elections. We use this data to explore aggregates complementing those used in social choice theory, finding that a metric of divisiveness, which is uncorrelated with traditional aggregation functions, can identify polarizing proposals. These metrics provide a score for the divisiveness of each proposal that can be estimated in the absence of data on the demographic characteristics of participants and that explains the issues that divide a population. These findings suggest divisiveness metrics can be useful complements to traditional aggregation functions in direct forms of digital participation.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2023; v1 submitted 8 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Collective discrete optimisation as judgment aggregation
Authors:
Linus Boes,
Rachael Colley,
Umberto Grandi,
Jerome Lang,
Arianna Novaro
Abstract:
Many important collective decision-making problems can be seen as multi-agent versions of discrete optimisation problems. Participatory budgeting, for instance, is the collective version of the knapsack problem; other examples include collective scheduling, and collective spanning trees. Rather than develo** a specific model, as well as specific algorithmic techniques, for each of these problems…
▽ More
Many important collective decision-making problems can be seen as multi-agent versions of discrete optimisation problems. Participatory budgeting, for instance, is the collective version of the knapsack problem; other examples include collective scheduling, and collective spanning trees. Rather than develo** a specific model, as well as specific algorithmic techniques, for each of these problems, we propose to represent and solve them in the unifying framework of judgment aggregation with weighted issues. We provide a modular definition of collective discrete optimisation (CDO) rules based on coupling a set scoring function with an operator, and we show how they generalise several existing procedures developed for specific CDO problems. We also give an implementation based on integer linear programming (ILP) and test it on the problem of collective spanning trees.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Unravelling multi-agent ranked delegations
Authors:
Rachael Colley,
Umberto Grandi,
Arianna Novaro
Abstract:
We introduce a voting model with multi-agent ranked delegations. This model generalises liquid democracy in two aspects: first, an agent's delegation can use the votes of multiple other agents to determine their own -- for instance, an agent's vote may correspond to the majority outcome of the votes of a trusted group of agents; second, agents can submit a ranking over multiple delegations, so tha…
▽ More
We introduce a voting model with multi-agent ranked delegations. This model generalises liquid democracy in two aspects: first, an agent's delegation can use the votes of multiple other agents to determine their own -- for instance, an agent's vote may correspond to the majority outcome of the votes of a trusted group of agents; second, agents can submit a ranking over multiple delegations, so that a backup delegation can be used when their preferred delegations are involved in cycles. The main focus of this paper is the study of unravelling procedures that transform the delegation ballots received from the agents into a profile of direct votes, from which a winning alternative can then be determined by using a standard voting rule. We propose and study six such unravelling procedures, two based on optimisation and four using a greedy approach. We study both algorithmic and axiomatic properties, as well as related computational complexity problems of our unravelling procedures for different restrictions on the types of ballots that the agents can submit.
△ Less
Submitted 25 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
