Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Christensen, H M

The Link between Gulf Stream Precipitation and European Blocking in General Circulation Models and the Role of Horizontal Resolution

Authors: Kristian Strommen, Simon L. L. Michel, Hannah M. Christensen

Abstract: Past studies show that coupled model biases in European blocking and North Atlantic eddy-driven jet variability decrease as one increases the horizontal resolution in the atmospheric and oceanic model components. This has commonly been argued to be related to an alleviation of sea surface temperature (SST) biases due to increased oceanic resolution in particular, with a physical pathway via change… ▽ More Past studies show that coupled model biases in European blocking and North Atlantic eddy-driven jet variability decrease as one increases the horizontal resolution in the atmospheric and oceanic model components. This has commonly been argued to be related to an alleviation of sea surface temperature (SST) biases due to increased oceanic resolution in particular, with a physical pathway via changes to surface baroclinicity. On the other hand, many studies have now highlighted the key role of diabatic processes in the Gulf Stream region on blocking formation and maintenance. Here, following recent work by Schemm, we leverage a large multi-model ensemble to show that Gulf Stream precipitation variability in coupled models is tightly linked to the simulated frequency of European blocking and northern jet excursions. Furthermore, the reduced biases in blocking and jet variability are consistent with greater precipitation variability as a result of increased atmospheric horizontal resolution. By contrast, typical North Atlantic SST biases are found to share only a weak or negligible relationship with blocking and jet biases. Finally, while previous studies have used a comparison between coupled models and models run with prescribed SSTs to argue for the role of ocean resolution, we emphasise here that models run with prescribed SSTs experience greatly reduced precipitation variability due to their excessive thermal dam**, making it unclear if such a comparison is meaningful. Instead, we speculate that most of the reduction in coupled model biases may actually be due to increased atmospheric resolution. △ Less

Submitted 18 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: Submitted for review

Defining error accumulation in ML atmospheric simulators

Authors: Raghul Parthipan, Mohit Anand, Hannah M. Christensen, J. Scott Hosking, Damon J. Wischik

Abstract: Machine learning (ML) has recently shown significant promise in modelling atmospheric systems, such as the weather. Many of these ML models are autoregressive, and error accumulation in their forecasts is a key problem. However, there is no clear definition of what `error accumulation' actually entails. In this paper, we propose a definition and an associated metric to measure it. Our definition d… ▽ More Machine learning (ML) has recently shown significant promise in modelling atmospheric systems, such as the weather. Many of these ML models are autoregressive, and error accumulation in their forecasts is a key problem. However, there is no clear definition of what `error accumulation' actually entails. In this paper, we propose a definition and an associated metric to measure it. Our definition distinguishes between errors which are due to model deficiencies, which we may hope to fix, and those due to the intrinsic properties of atmospheric systems (chaos, unobserved variables), which are not fixable. We illustrate the usefulness of this definition by proposing a simple regularization loss penalty inspired by it. This approach shows performance improvements (according to RMSE and spread/skill) in a selection of atmospheric systems, including the real-world weather prediction task. △ Less

Submitted 23 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: Submitted to NeurIPS 2024. 27 pages (including appendices)

Machine Learning for Stochastic Parametrisation

Authors: Hannah M. Christensen, Salah Kouhen, Greta Miller, Raghul Parthipan

Abstract: Atmospheric models used for weather and climate prediction are traditionally formulated in a deterministic manner. In other words, given a particular state of the resolved scale variables, the most likely forcing from the sub-grid scale processes is estimated and used to predict the evolution of the large-scale flow. However, the lack of scale-separation in the atmosphere means that this approach… ▽ More Atmospheric models used for weather and climate prediction are traditionally formulated in a deterministic manner. In other words, given a particular state of the resolved scale variables, the most likely forcing from the sub-grid scale processes is estimated and used to predict the evolution of the large-scale flow. However, the lack of scale-separation in the atmosphere means that this approach is a large source of error in forecasts. Over recent years, an alternative paradigm has developed: the use of stochastic techniques to characterise uncertainty in small-scale processes. These techniques are now widely used across weather, sub-seasonal, seasonal, and climate timescales. In parallel, recent years have also seen significant progress in replacing parametrisation schemes using machine learning (ML). This has the potential to both speed up and improve our numerical models. However, the focus to date has largely been on deterministic approaches. In this position paper, we bring together these two key developments, and discuss the potential for data-driven approaches for stochastic parametrisation. We highlight early studies in this area, and draw attention to the novel challenges that remain. △ Less

Submitted 12 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: Submitted to Climate Informatics 2024

Using Probabilistic Machine Learning to Better Model Temporal Patterns in Parameterizations: a case study with the Lorenz 96 model

Authors: Raghul Parthipan, Hannah M. Christensen, J. Scott Hosking, Damon J. Wischik

Abstract: The modelling of small-scale processes is a major source of error in climate models, hindering the accuracy of low-cost models which must approximate such processes through parameterization. Red noise is essential to many operational parameterization schemes, hel** model temporal correlations. We show how to build on the successes of red noise by combining the known benefits of stochasticity wit… ▽ More The modelling of small-scale processes is a major source of error in climate models, hindering the accuracy of low-cost models which must approximate such processes through parameterization. Red noise is essential to many operational parameterization schemes, hel** model temporal correlations. We show how to build on the successes of red noise by combining the known benefits of stochasticity with machine learning. This is done using a physically-informed recurrent neural network within a probabilistic framework. Our model is competitive and often superior to both a bespoke baseline and an existing probabilistic machine learning approach (GAN) when applied to the Lorenz 96 atmospheric simulation. This is due to its superior ability to model temporal patterns compared to standard first-order autoregressive schemes. It also generalises to unseen scenarios. We evaluate across a number of metrics from the literature, and also discuss the benefits of using the probabilistic metric of hold-out likelihood. △ Less

Submitted 12 September, 2022; v1 submitted 28 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: Submitted to Geoscientific Model Development (GMD). 26 pages, 10 figures. The manuscript was revised following helpful comments from the reviewers after rejection from the Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES). These included further experimental results and changes to the narrative, amongst other revisions. New version created to include grant numbers of funding bodies

The Fractal Nature of Clouds in Global Storm-Resolving Models

Authors: Hannah M. Christensen, Oliver G. A. Driver

Abstract: Clouds in observations are fractals: they show self-similarity across scales ranging from one to 1000 km. This includes individual storms and large-scale cloud structures typical of organised convection. It is not known whether global storm-resolving models reproduce the observed fractal scaling laws for clouds and organised convection. We compute the fractal dimension of clouds using Himawari sat… ▽ More Clouds in observations are fractals: they show self-similarity across scales ranging from one to 1000 km. This includes individual storms and large-scale cloud structures typical of organised convection. It is not known whether global storm-resolving models reproduce the observed fractal scaling laws for clouds and organised convection. We compute the fractal dimension of clouds using Himawari satellite data and compare this to global storm-resolving model simulations completed as part of the DYAMOND intercomparison project. We find cloud fields in these simulations are indeed fractal, and reproduce the observed fractal dimension to within 10\%. We find the fractal dimension is sensitive to the choice of boundary layer parametrisation scheme used in each model simulation, and not to the convection parametrisation as might have been expected. The fractal dimension is independent of cloud area distributions, providing a complementary metric to assess the multi-scale structure of convection and convective organisation in model simulations. △ Less

Submitted 19 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Comments: Submitted to Geophysical Research Letters

Machine Learning for Stochastic Parameterization: Generative Adversarial Networks in the Lorenz '96 Model

Authors: David John Gagne II, Hannah M. Christensen, Aneesh C. Subramanian, Adam H. Monahan

Abstract: Stochastic parameterizations account for uncertainty in the representation of unresolved sub-grid processes by sampling from the distribution of possible sub-grid forcings. Some existing stochastic parameterizations utilize data-driven approaches to characterize uncertainty, but these approaches require significant structural assumptions that can limit their scalability. Machine learning models, i… ▽ More Stochastic parameterizations account for uncertainty in the representation of unresolved sub-grid processes by sampling from the distribution of possible sub-grid forcings. Some existing stochastic parameterizations utilize data-driven approaches to characterize uncertainty, but these approaches require significant structural assumptions that can limit their scalability. Machine learning models, including neural networks, are able to represent a wide range of distributions and build optimized map**s between a large number of inputs and sub-grid forcings. Recent research on machine learning parameterizations has focused only on deterministic parameterizations. In this study, we develop a stochastic parameterization using the generative adversarial network (GAN) machine learning framework. The GAN stochastic parameterization is trained and evaluated on output from the Lorenz '96 model, which is a common baseline model for evaluating both parameterization and data assimilation techniques. We evaluate different ways of characterizing the input noise for the model and perform model runs with the GAN parameterization at weather and climate timescales. Some of the GAN configurations perform better than a baseline bespoke parameterization at both timescales, and the networks closely reproduce the spatio-temporal correlations and regimes of the Lorenz '96 system. We also find that in general those models which produce skillful forecasts are also associated with the best climate simulations. △ Less

Submitted 10 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Comments: Submitted to Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES)

Constraining stochastic parametrisation schemes using high-resolution simulations

Authors: Hannah M. Christensen

Abstract: Stochastic parametrisations are used in weather and climate models to improve the representation of unpredictable unresolved processes. When compared to a deterministic model, a stochastic model represents `model uncertainty', i.e., sources of error in the forecast due to the limitations of the forecast model. We present a technique for systematically deriving new stochastic parametrisations or fo… ▽ More Stochastic parametrisations are used in weather and climate models to improve the representation of unpredictable unresolved processes. When compared to a deterministic model, a stochastic model represents `model uncertainty', i.e., sources of error in the forecast due to the limitations of the forecast model. We present a technique for systematically deriving new stochastic parametrisations or for constraining existing stochastic approaches. A high-resolution model simulation is coarse-grained to the desired forecast model resolution. This provides the initial conditions and forcing data needed to drive a Single Column Model (SCM). By comparing the SCM parametrised tendencies with the evolution of the high resolution model, we can estimate the error in the SCM tendencies that a stochastic parametrisation seeks to represent. We use this approach to assess the physical basis of the widely used Stochastically Perturbed Parametrisation Tendencies (SPPT) scheme. We find justification for the multiplicative nature of SPPT, and for the use of spatio-temporally correlated stochastic perturbations. We find evidence that the stochastic perturbation should be positively skewed, indicating that occasional large-magnitude positive perturbations are physically realistic. However other key assumptions of SPPT are less well justified, including coherency of the stochastic perturbations with height, coherency of the perturbations for different physical parametrisation schemes, and coherency for different prognostic variables. Relaxing these SPPT assumptions allows for an error model that explains a larger fractional variance than traditional SPPT. In particular, we suggest that independently perturbing the tendencies associated with different parametrisation schemes is justifiable, and would improve the realism of the SPPT approach. △ Less

Submitted 9 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Comments: 31 pages, 14 figures