Neural Latents Benchmark '21: Evaluating latent variable models of neural population activity
Authors:
Felix Pei,
Joel Ye,
David Zoltowski,
Anqi Wu,
Raeed H. Chowdhury,
Hansem Sohn,
Joseph E. O'Doherty,
Krishna V. Shenoy,
Matthew T. Kaufman,
Mark Churchland,
Mehrdad Jazayeri,
Lee E. Miller,
Jonathan Pillow,
Il Memming Park,
Eva L. Dyer,
Chethan Pandarinath
Abstract:
Advances in neural recording present increasing opportunities to study neural activity in unprecedented detail. Latent variable models (LVMs) are promising tools for analyzing this rich activity across diverse neural systems and behaviors, as LVMs do not depend on known relationships between the activity and external experimental variables. However, progress with LVMs for neuronal population activ…
▽ More
Advances in neural recording present increasing opportunities to study neural activity in unprecedented detail. Latent variable models (LVMs) are promising tools for analyzing this rich activity across diverse neural systems and behaviors, as LVMs do not depend on known relationships between the activity and external experimental variables. However, progress with LVMs for neuronal population activity is currently impeded by a lack of standardization, resulting in methods being developed and compared in an ad hoc manner. To coordinate these modeling efforts, we introduce a benchmark suite for latent variable modeling of neural population activity. We curate four datasets of neural spiking activity from cognitive, sensory, and motor areas to promote models that apply to the wide variety of activity seen across these areas. We identify unsupervised evaluation as a common framework for evaluating models across datasets, and apply several baselines that demonstrate benchmark diversity. We release this benchmark through EvalAI. http://neurallatents.github.io
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2022; v1 submitted 9 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
Machine learning for neural decoding
Authors:
Joshua I. Glaser,
Ari S. Benjamin,
Raeed H. Chowdhury,
Matthew G. Perich,
Lee E. Miller,
Konrad P. Kording
Abstract:
Despite rapid advances in machine learning tools, the majority of neural decoding approaches still use traditional methods. Modern machine learning tools, which are versatile and easy to use, have the potential to significantly improve decoding performance. This tutorial describes how to effectively apply these algorithms for typical decoding problems. We provide descriptions, best practices, and…
▽ More
Despite rapid advances in machine learning tools, the majority of neural decoding approaches still use traditional methods. Modern machine learning tools, which are versatile and easy to use, have the potential to significantly improve decoding performance. This tutorial describes how to effectively apply these algorithms for typical decoding problems. We provide descriptions, best practices, and code for applying common machine learning methods, including neural networks and gradient boosting. We also provide detailed comparisons of the performance of various methods at the task of decoding spiking activity in motor cortex, somatosensory cortex, and hippocampus. Modern methods, particularly neural networks and ensembles, significantly outperform traditional approaches, such as Wiener and Kalman filters. Improving the performance of neural decoding algorithms allows neuroscientists to better understand the information contained in a neural population and can help advance engineering applications such as brain machine interfaces.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2020; v1 submitted 2 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
