Predicting optical coherence tomography-derived diabetic macular edema grades from fundus photographs using deep learning
Authors:
Avinash Varadarajan,
Pinal Bavishi,
Paisan Raumviboonsuk,
Peranut Chotcomwongse,
Subhashini Venugopalan,
Arunachalam Narayanaswamy,
Jorge Cuadros,
Kuniyoshi Kanai,
George Bresnick,
Mongkol Tadarati,
Sukhum Silpa-archa,
Jirawut Limwattanayingyong,
Variya Nganthavee,
Joe Ledsam,
Pearse A Keane,
Greg S Corrado,
Lily Peng,
Dale R Webster
Abstract:
Diabetic eye disease is one of the fastest growing causes of preventable blindness. With the advent of anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) therapies, it has become increasingly important to detect center-involved diabetic macular edema (ci-DME). However, center-involved diabetic macular edema is diagnosed using optical coherence tomography (OCT), which is not generally available at scre…
▽ More
Diabetic eye disease is one of the fastest growing causes of preventable blindness. With the advent of anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) therapies, it has become increasingly important to detect center-involved diabetic macular edema (ci-DME). However, center-involved diabetic macular edema is diagnosed using optical coherence tomography (OCT), which is not generally available at screening sites because of cost and workflow constraints. Instead, screening programs rely on the detection of hard exudates in color fundus photographs as a proxy for DME, often resulting in high false positive or false negative calls. To improve the accuracy of DME screening, we trained a deep learning model to use color fundus photographs to predict ci-DME. Our model had an ROC-AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87-0.91), which corresponds to a sensitivity of 85% at a specificity of 80%. In comparison, three retinal specialists had similar sensitivities (82-85%), but only half the specificity (45-50%, p<0.001 for each comparison with model). The positive predictive value (PPV) of the model was 61% (95% CI: 56-66%), approximately double the 36-38% by the retinal specialists. In addition to predicting ci-DME, our model was able to detect the presence of intraretinal fluid with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.81-0.86) and subretinal fluid with an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91). The ability of deep learning algorithms to make clinically relevant predictions that generally require sophisticated 3D-imaging equipment from simple 2D images has broad relevance to many other applications in medical imaging.
△ Less
Submitted 31 July, 2019; v1 submitted 18 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
Deep Learning vs. Human Graders for Classifying Severity Levels of Diabetic Retinopathy in a Real-World Nationwide Screening Program
Authors:
Paisan Raumviboonsuk,
Jonathan Krause,
Peranut Chotcomwongse,
Rory Sayres,
Rajiv Raman,
Kasumi Widner,
Bilson J L Campana,
Sonia Phene,
Kornwipa Hemarat,
Mongkol Tadarati,
Sukhum Silpa-Acha,
Jirawut Limwattanayingyong,
Chetan Rao,
Oscar Kuruvilla,
Jesse Jung,
Jeffrey Tan,
Surapong Orprayoon,
Chawawat Kangwanwongpaisan,
Ramase Sukulmalpaiboon,
Chainarong Luengchaichawang,
Jitumporn Fuangkaew,
Pipat Kongsap,
Lamyong Chualinpha,
Sarawuth Saree,
Srirat Kawinpanitan
, et al. (7 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Deep learning algorithms have been used to detect diabetic retinopathy (DR) with specialist-level accuracy. This study aims to validate one such algorithm on a large-scale clinical population, and compare the algorithm performance with that of human graders. 25,326 gradable retinal images of patients with diabetes from the community-based, nation-wide screening program of DR in Thailand were analy…
▽ More
Deep learning algorithms have been used to detect diabetic retinopathy (DR) with specialist-level accuracy. This study aims to validate one such algorithm on a large-scale clinical population, and compare the algorithm performance with that of human graders. 25,326 gradable retinal images of patients with diabetes from the community-based, nation-wide screening program of DR in Thailand were analyzed for DR severity and referable diabetic macular edema (DME). Grades adjudicated by a panel of international retinal specialists served as the reference standard. Across different severity levels of DR for determining referable disease, deep learning significantly reduced the false negative rate (by 23%) at the cost of slightly higher false positive rates (2%). Deep learning algorithms may serve as a valuable tool for DR screening.
△ Less
Submitted 18 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
