Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Cesana, G

Sums of proper divisors with missing digits

Authors: Kübra Benli, Giulia Cesana, Cécile Dartyge, Charlotte Dombrowsky, Lola Thompson

Abstract: Let $s(n)$ denote the sum of proper divisors of an integer $n$. In 1992, Erdős, Granville, Pomerance, and Spiro (EGPS) conjectured that if $\mathcal{A}$ is a set of integers with asymptotic density zero then $s^{-1}(\mathcal{A})$ also has asymptotic density zero. In this paper we show that the EGPS conjecture holds when $\mathcal{A}$ is taken to be a set of integers with missing digits. In particu… ▽ More Let $s(n)$ denote the sum of proper divisors of an integer $n$. In 1992, Erdős, Granville, Pomerance, and Spiro (EGPS) conjectured that if $\mathcal{A}$ is a set of integers with asymptotic density zero then $s^{-1}(\mathcal{A})$ also has asymptotic density zero. In this paper we show that the EGPS conjecture holds when $\mathcal{A}$ is taken to be a set of integers with missing digits. In particular, we give a sharp upper bound for the size of this preimage set. We also provide an overview of progress towards the EGPS conjecture and survey recent work on sets of integers with missing digits. △ Less

Submitted 24 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Fourier Coefficients of Weight Zero Mixed False Modular Forms

Authors: Giulia Cesana

Abstract: In this paper we employ the Circle Method to give exact formulae for Fourier coefficients of an infinite family of weight zero mixed false modular forms using and extending the techniques of Bringmann and Nazaroglu as well as Rademacher. To do so we additionally provide a bound on a Kloosterman sum of modulus $k$. In this paper we employ the Circle Method to give exact formulae for Fourier coefficients of an infinite family of weight zero mixed false modular forms using and extending the techniques of Bringmann and Nazaroglu as well as Rademacher. To do so we additionally provide a bound on a Kloosterman sum of modulus $k$. △ Less

Submitted 19 April, 2023; v1 submitted 24 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: 53 pages, 3 figures, 1 table; Comments welcome!

Asymptotic equidistribution for partition statistics and topological invariants

Authors: Giulia Cesana, William Craig, Joshua Males

Abstract: We provide a general framework for proving asymptotic equidistribution, convexity, and log concavity of coefficients of generating functions on arithmetic progressions. Our central tool is a variant of Wright's Circle Method proved by two of the authors with Bringmann and Ono, following work of Ngo and Rhoades. We offer a selection of different examples of such results, proving asymptotic equidist… ▽ More We provide a general framework for proving asymptotic equidistribution, convexity, and log concavity of coefficients of generating functions on arithmetic progressions. Our central tool is a variant of Wright's Circle Method proved by two of the authors with Bringmann and Ono, following work of Ngo and Rhoades. We offer a selection of different examples of such results, proving asymptotic equidistribution results for several partition statistics, modular sums of Betti numbers of two- and three-flag Hilbert schemes, and the number of cells of dimension a (mod b) of a certain scheme central in work of Göttsche. △ Less

Submitted 7 December, 2021; v1 submitted 26 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Comments: 17 pages, comments welcome! This version includes a missing citation

Bivariate asymptotics for eta-theta quotients with simple poles

Authors: Giulia Cesana, Joshua Males

Abstract: We employ a variant of Wright's circle method to determine the bivariate asymptotic behaviour of Fourier coefficients for a wide class of eta-theta quotients with simple poles in $\mathbb{H}$. We employ a variant of Wright's circle method to determine the bivariate asymptotic behaviour of Fourier coefficients for a wide class of eta-theta quotients with simple poles in $\mathbb{H}$. △ Less

Submitted 8 July, 2021; v1 submitted 25 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

Comments: 16 pages, 2 figures, comments are welcome. This version corrects an error of the previous iteration. We still obtain similar results

Disagreement among global cloud distributions from CALIOP, passive satellite sensors and general circulation models

Authors: Vincent Noel, H. Chepfer, M Chiriaco, D. Winker, H. Okamoto, Y. Hagihara, G. Cesana, A Lacour

Abstract: Cloud detection is the first step of any complex satellite-based cloud retrieval. No instrument detects all clouds, and analyses that use a given satellite climatology can only discuss a specific subset of clouds. We attempt to clarify which subsets of clouds are detected in a robust way by passive sensors, and which require active sensors. To do so, we identify where retrievals of Cloud Amounts (… ▽ More Cloud detection is the first step of any complex satellite-based cloud retrieval. No instrument detects all clouds, and analyses that use a given satellite climatology can only discuss a specific subset of clouds. We attempt to clarify which subsets of clouds are detected in a robust way by passive sensors, and which require active sensors. To do so, we identify where retrievals of Cloud Amounts (CAs), based on numerous sensors and algorithms, differ the most. We investigate large uncertainties, and confront retrievals from the CALIOP lidar, which detects semitransparent clouds and directly measures their vertical distribution, whatever the surface below. We document the cloud vertical distribution, opacity and seasonal variability where CAs from passive sensors disagree most. CALIOP CAs are larger than the passive average by +0.05 (AM) and +0.07 (PM). Over land, the +0.1 average difference rises to +0.2 over the African desert, Antarctica and Greenland, where large passive disagreements are traced to unfavorable surface conditions. Over oceans, CALIOP retrievals are closer to the average of passive retrievals except over the ITCZ (+0.1). Passive CAs disagree more in tropical areas associated with large-scale subsidence, where CALIOP observes a specific multi-layer cloud population: optically thin, high-level clouds and opaque (z>7km), shallow boundary layer clouds (z<2km). We evaluate the CA and cloud vertical distribution from 8 General Circulation Models where passive retrievals disagree and CALIOP provides new information. We find that modeled clouds are not more realistic where cloud detections from passive observations have long been robust, than where active sensors provide more reliable information. △ Less

Submitted 16 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.