-
A novel comparison of Møller and Compton electron-beam polarimeters
Authors:
J. A. Magee,
A. Narayan,
D. Jones,
R. Beminiwattha,
J. C. Cornejo,
M. M. Dalton,
W. Deconinck,
D. Dutta,
D. Gaskell,
J. W. Martin,
K. D. Paschke,
V. Tvaskis,
A. Asaturyan,
J. Benesch,
G. Cates,
B. S. Cavness,
L. A. Dillon-Townes,
G. Hays,
J. Hoskins,
E. Ihloff,
R. Jones,
P. M. King,
S. Kowalski,
L. Kurchaninov,
L. Lee
, et al. (16 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We have performed a novel comparison between electron-beam polarimeters based on Møller and Compton scattering. A sequence of electron-beam polarization measurements were performed at low beam currents ($<$ 5 $μ$A) during the $Q_{\rm weak}$ experiment in Hall C at Jefferson Lab. These low current measurements were bracketed by the regular high current (180 $μ$A) operation of the Compton polarimete…
▽ More
We have performed a novel comparison between electron-beam polarimeters based on Møller and Compton scattering. A sequence of electron-beam polarization measurements were performed at low beam currents ($<$ 5 $μ$A) during the $Q_{\rm weak}$ experiment in Hall C at Jefferson Lab. These low current measurements were bracketed by the regular high current (180 $μ$A) operation of the Compton polarimeter. All measurements were found to be consistent within experimental uncertainties of 1% or less, demonstrating that electron polarization does not depend significantly on the beam current. This result lends confidence to the common practice of applying Møller measurements made at low beam currents to physics experiments performed at higher beam currents. The agreement between two polarimetry techniques based on independent physical processes sets an important benchmark for future precision asymmetry measurements that require sub-1% precision in polarimetry.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2017; v1 submitted 19 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
Precision Electron-Beam Polarimetry using Compton Scattering at 1 GeV
Authors:
A. Narayan,
D. Jones,
J. C. Cornejo,
M. M. Dalton,
W. Deconinck,
D. Dutta,
D. Gaskell,
J. W. Martin,
K. D. Paschke,
V. Tvaskis,
A. Asaturyan,
J. Benesch,
G. Cates,
B. S. Cavness,
L. A. Dillon-Townes,
G. Hays,
E. Ihloff,
R. Jones,
S. Kowalski,
L. Kurchaninov,
L. Lee,
A. McCreary,
M. McDonald,
A. Micherdzinska,
A. Mkrtchyan
, et al. (11 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report on the highest precision yet achieved in the measurement of the polarization of a low energy, $\mathcal{O}$(1 GeV), electron beam, accomplished using a new polarimeter based on electron-photon scattering, in Hall~C at Jefferson Lab. A number of technical innovations were necessary, including a novel method for precise control of the laser polarization in a cavity and a novel diamond micr…
▽ More
We report on the highest precision yet achieved in the measurement of the polarization of a low energy, $\mathcal{O}$(1 GeV), electron beam, accomplished using a new polarimeter based on electron-photon scattering, in Hall~C at Jefferson Lab. A number of technical innovations were necessary, including a novel method for precise control of the laser polarization in a cavity and a novel diamond micro-strip detector which was able to capture most of the spectrum of scattered electrons. The data analysis technique exploited track finding, the high granularity of the detector and its large acceptance. The polarization of the $180~μ$A, $1.16$~GeV electron beam was measured with a statistical precision of $<$~1\% per hour and a systematic uncertainty of 0.59\%. This exceeds the level of precision required by the \qweak experiment, a measurement of the vector weak charge of the proton. Proposed future low-energy experiments require polarization uncertainty $<$~0.4\%, and this result represents an important demonstration of that possibility. This measurement is also the first use of diamond detectors for particle tracking in an experiment.
△ Less
Submitted 17 February, 2016; v1 submitted 22 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
-
The Q_weak Experimental Apparatus
Authors:
Qweak Collaboration,
T. Allison,
M. Anderson,
D. Androic,
D. S. Armstrong,
A. Asaturyan,
T. D. Averett,
R. Averill,
J. Balewski,
J. Beaufait,
R. S. Beminiwattha,
J. Benesch,
F. Benmokhtar,
J. Bessuille,
J. Birchall,
E. Bonnell,
J. Bowman,
P. Brindza,
D. B. Brown,
R. D. Carlini,
G. D. Cates,
B. Cavness,
G. Clark,
J. C. Cornejo,
S. Covrig Dusa
, et al. (104 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Jefferson Lab Q_weak experiment determined the weak charge of the proton by measuring the parity-violating elastic scattering asymmetry of longitudinally polarized electrons from an unpolarized liquid hydrogen target at small momentum transfer. A custom apparatus was designed for this experiment to meet the technical challenges presented by the smallest and most precise ${\vec{e}}$p asymmetry…
▽ More
The Jefferson Lab Q_weak experiment determined the weak charge of the proton by measuring the parity-violating elastic scattering asymmetry of longitudinally polarized electrons from an unpolarized liquid hydrogen target at small momentum transfer. A custom apparatus was designed for this experiment to meet the technical challenges presented by the smallest and most precise ${\vec{e}}$p asymmetry ever measured. Technical milestones were achieved at Jefferson Lab in target power, beam current, beam helicity reversal rate, polarimetry, detected rates, and control of helicity-correlated beam properties. The experiment employed 180 microA of 89% longitudinally polarized electrons whose helicity was reversed 960 times per second. The electrons were accelerated to 1.16 GeV and directed to a beamline with extensive instrumentation to measure helicity-correlated beam properties that can induce false asymmetries. Moller and Compton polarimetry were used to measure the electron beam polarization to better than 1%. The electron beam was incident on a 34.4 cm liquid hydrogen target. After passing through a triple collimator system, scattered electrons between 5.8 degrees and 11.6 degrees were bent in the toroidal magnetic field of a resistive copper-coil magnet. The electrons inside this acceptance were focused onto eight fused silica Cerenkov detectors arrayed symmetrically around the beam axis. A total scattered electron rate of about 7 GHz was incident on the detector array. The detectors were read out in integrating mode by custom-built low-noise pre-amplifiers and 18-bit sampling ADC modules. The momentum transfer Q^2 = 0.025 GeV^2 was determined using dedicated low-current (~100 pA) measurements with a set of drift chambers before (and a set of drift chambers and trigger scintillation counters after) the toroidal magnet.
△ Less
Submitted 6 January, 2015; v1 submitted 24 September, 2014;
originally announced September 2014.
-
Spectra of Radiation Emitted from Open-Ended and Closed Carbon Nanotubes Exposed to Microwave Fields
Authors:
B. Cavness,
N. McGara,
S. Williams
Abstract:
We performed experiments in which both open-ended and closed carbon nanotubes were exposed to 2.46 GHz microwaves over the course of several irradiation and cooling cycles at a pressure of ~10-6 torr. The spectra of the radiation emitted from the nanotubes indicate that the intensity of the emitted radiation with wavelengths of 650-1000 nm increased during the irradiation cycles. However, the inte…
▽ More
We performed experiments in which both open-ended and closed carbon nanotubes were exposed to 2.46 GHz microwaves over the course of several irradiation and cooling cycles at a pressure of ~10-6 torr. The spectra of the radiation emitted from the nanotubes indicate that the intensity of the emitted radiation with wavelengths of 650-1000 nm increased during the irradiation cycles. However, the intensity of the radiation emitted from untreated nanotubes increased substantially more than the intensity of the radiation emitted from nanotubes that had been chemically treated in order to open nanotube ends. As open-ended nanotubes have a lower work function than closed nanotubes, and as nanotube ends are known to open as they are heated, our results suggest that the mechanism responsible for the emission of infrared, visible, and ultra-violet radiation from carbon nanotubes exposed to microwaves is field emission-induced luminescence.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2015; v1 submitted 27 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
-
Angular distribution of thick-target bremsstrahlung produced by electrons with initial energies ranging from 10 to 20-keV incident on Ag
Authors:
D. Gonzales,
B. Cavness,
S. Williams
Abstract:
Experimental results are presented comparing the intensity of the bremsstrahlung produced by electrons with initial energies ranging from 10 to 20-keV incident on a thick Ag target, measured at forward angles in the range 0 degrees to 55 degrees. When the data are corrected for attenuation due to photon absorption within the target, the results indicate that the detected radiation is distributed a…
▽ More
Experimental results are presented comparing the intensity of the bremsstrahlung produced by electrons with initial energies ranging from 10 to 20-keV incident on a thick Ag target, measured at forward angles in the range 0 degrees to 55 degrees. When the data are corrected for attenuation due to photon absorption within the target, the results indicate that the detected radiation is distributed anisotropically only at photon energies, k, that are approximately equal to the initial energy of the incident electrons, Eo. The results of our experiments suggest that as k /Eo goes to 0, the detected radiation becomes essentially isotropic due primarily to the scattering of electrons within the target. A comparison to the theoretical work of Kissel et al. [At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 28, 381 (1983)] suggests that the angular distribution of bremsstrahlung emitted by electrons incident on thick targets is similar to the angular distribution of bremsstrahlung emitted by electrons incident on free-atom targets only when k /Eo is approximately equal to 1. The experimental data are also in approximate agreement with the angular distribution predictions of the Monte Carlo program, PENELOPE.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2013;
originally announced February 2013.
-
Spectra of radiation emitted by single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes during multiple microwave irradiation and cooling cycles
Authors:
S. Ferguson,
N. McGara,
B. Cavness,
D. Gonzales,
S. Williams
Abstract:
Carbon nanotubes have been observed to emit ultraviolet, visible, and infrared radiation when exposed to microwave fields. We have performed experiments in which both single-walled (~1 nm diameters) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (>50 nm diameters) were exposed to 2.45 GHz microwaves during several irradiation and cooling cycles at a pressure of ~10-6 torr. A comparison of the spectra of the ra…
▽ More
Carbon nanotubes have been observed to emit ultraviolet, visible, and infrared radiation when exposed to microwave fields. We have performed experiments in which both single-walled (~1 nm diameters) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (>50 nm diameters) were exposed to 2.45 GHz microwaves during several irradiation and cooling cycles at a pressure of ~10-6 torr. A comparison of the spectra of the radiation emitted by the nanotubes indicates that the intensity of radiation with wavelengths ranging from 700 to 1000 nm increased substantially during the course of five irradiation and cooling cycles. The data suggests that the mechanism responsible for the emissions is field emission-induced luminescence and that the intensity of the radiation emitted increased due to the opening of nanotube ends. Furthermore, the intensity of the radiation emitted by the multi-walled carbon nanotubes was much greater than the radiation emitted by the single-walled nanotubes. Scanning electron microscopy images indicate that most of the single-walled nanotubes were bundled together, while the multi-walled nanotubes were not. This bundling may have resulted in a lower field enhancement factor and/or screening effects which might help to explain the difference in the intensities of the radiation emitted by the samples.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2015; v1 submitted 31 January, 2013;
originally announced January 2013.
