Dynamic Silos: Increased Modularity in Intra-organizational Communication Networks during the Covid-19 Pandemic
Authors:
Tiona Zuzul,
Emily Cox Pahnke,
Jonathan Larson,
Patrick Bourke,
Nicholas Caurvina,
Neha Parikh Shah,
Fereshteh Amini,
Jeffrey Weston,
Youngser Park,
Joshua Vogelstein,
Christopher White,
Carey E. Priebe
Abstract:
Workplace communications around the world were drastically altered by Covid-19, related work-from-home orders, and the rise of remote work. To understand these shifts, we analyzed aggregated, anonymized metadata from over 360 billion emails within 4,361 organizations worldwide. By comparing month-to-month and year-over-year metrics, we examined changes in network community structures over 24 month…
▽ More
Workplace communications around the world were drastically altered by Covid-19, related work-from-home orders, and the rise of remote work. To understand these shifts, we analyzed aggregated, anonymized metadata from over 360 billion emails within 4,361 organizations worldwide. By comparing month-to-month and year-over-year metrics, we examined changes in network community structures over 24 months before and after Covid-19. We also examined shifts across multiple communication media (email, instant messages, video calls, and calendaring software) within a single global organization, and compared them to communications shifts that were driven by changes in formal organizational structure. We found that, in 2020, organizations around the world became more siloed than in 2019, evidenced by increased modularity. This shift was concurrent with decreased stability within silos. Collectively, our analyses indicate that following the onset of Covid-19, employees began to shift more dynamically between subcommunities (teams, workgroups or functional areas). At the same time, once in a subcommunity, they limited their communication to other members of that community. We term these network changes dynamic silos. We provide initial insights into the meaning and implications of dynamic silos for the future of work.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2023; v1 submitted 1 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
Workgroup Map**: Visual Analysis of Collaboration Culture
Authors:
Darren Edge,
Jonathan Larson,
Nikolay Trandev,
Neha Parikh Shah,
Carolyn Buractaon,
Nicholas Caurvina,
Nathan Evans,
Christopher M. White
Abstract:
The digital transformation of work presents new opportunities to understand how informal workgroups organize around the dynamic needs of organizations, potentially in contrast to the formal, static, and idealized hierarchies depicted by org charts. We present a design study that spans multiple enabling capabilities for the visual map** and analysis of organizational workgroups, including metrics…
▽ More
The digital transformation of work presents new opportunities to understand how informal workgroups organize around the dynamic needs of organizations, potentially in contrast to the formal, static, and idealized hierarchies depicted by org charts. We present a design study that spans multiple enabling capabilities for the visual map** and analysis of organizational workgroups, including metrics for quantifying two dimensions of collaboration culture: the fluidity of collaborative relationships (measured using network machine learning) and the freedom with which workgroups form across organizational boundaries. These capabilities come together to create a turnkey pipeline that combines the analysis of a target organization, the generation of data graphics and statistics, and their integration in a template-based presentation that enables narrative visualization of results. Our metrics and visuals have supported hundreds of presentations to executives of major US-based and multinational organizations, while our engineering practices have created an ensemble of standalone tools with broad relevance to visualization and visual analytics. We present our work as an example of applied visual analytics research, describing the design iterations that allowed us to move from experimentation to production, as well as the perspectives of the research team and the customer-facing team at each stage in this process.
△ Less
Submitted 19 March, 2021; v1 submitted 1 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
