Latent Network Models to Account for Noisy, Multiply-Reported Social Network Data
Authors:
Caterina De Bacco,
Martina Contisciani,
Jonathan Cardoso-Silva,
Hadiseh Safdari,
Diego Baptista,
Gabriela L. Borges,
Tracy Sweet,
Jean-Gabriel Young,
Jeremy Koster,
Cody T. Ross,
Richard McElreath,
Daniel Redhead,
Eleanor A. Power
Abstract:
Social network data are often constructed by incorporating reports from multiple individuals. However, it is not obvious how to reconcile discordant responses from individuals. There may be particular risks with multiply-reported data if people's responses reflect normative expectations -- such as an expectation of balanced, reciprocal relationships. Here, we propose a probabilistic model that inc…
▽ More
Social network data are often constructed by incorporating reports from multiple individuals. However, it is not obvious how to reconcile discordant responses from individuals. There may be particular risks with multiply-reported data if people's responses reflect normative expectations -- such as an expectation of balanced, reciprocal relationships. Here, we propose a probabilistic model that incorporates ties reported by multiple individuals to estimate the unobserved network structure. In addition to estimating a parameter for each reporter that is related to their tendency of over- or under-reporting relationships, the model explicitly incorporates a term for ``mutuality,'' the tendency to report ties in both directions involving the same alter. Our model's algorithmic implementation is based on variational inference, which makes it efficient and scalable to large systems. We apply our model to data from 75 Indian villages collected with a name-generator design, and a Nicaraguan community collected with a roster-based design. We observe strong evidence of ``mutuality'' in both datasets, and find that this value varies by relationship type. Consequently, our model estimates networks with reciprocity values that are substantially different than those resulting from standard deterministic aggregation approaches, demonstrating the need to consider such issues when gathering, constructing, and analysing survey-based network data.
△ Less
Submitted 12 December, 2022; v1 submitted 21 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
Weekly sequential Bayesian updating improves prediction of deaths at an early epidemic stage
Authors:
Pedro Henrique da Costa Avelar,
Natalia Del Coco,
Luis C. Lamb,
Sophia Tsoka,
Jonathan Cardoso-Silva
Abstract:
Background: Following the outbreak of the coronavirus epidemic in early 2020, municipalities, regional governments and policymakers worldwide had to plan their Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) amidst a scenario of great uncertainty. At this early stage of an epidemic, where no vaccine or medical treatment is in sight, algorithmic prediction can become a powerful tool to inform local policym…
▽ More
Background: Following the outbreak of the coronavirus epidemic in early 2020, municipalities, regional governments and policymakers worldwide had to plan their Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) amidst a scenario of great uncertainty. At this early stage of an epidemic, where no vaccine or medical treatment is in sight, algorithmic prediction can become a powerful tool to inform local policymaking. However, when we replicated one prominent epidemiological model to inform health authorities in a region in the south of Brazil, we found that this model relied too heavily on manually predetermined covariates and was too reactive to changes in data trends.
Methods: Our four proposed variations of the original method allow accessing data of daily reported infections and take into account the under-reporting of cases more explicitly. Two of the proposed versions also attempt to model the delay in test reporting. We simulated weekly forecasting of deaths from the period from 31/05/2020 until 31/01/2021. That workflow allowed us to run a lighter version of the model after the first calibration week. Google Mobility data, weekly updated, were used as covariates to the model at each simulated run.
Findings: The changes made the model significantly less reactive and more rapid in adapting to scenarios after a peak in deaths is observed. Assuming that reported cases were under-reported greatly benefited the model in its stability, and modelling retroactively-added data (due to the "hot" nature of the data used) had a negligible impact on performance.
Interpretation: Although not as reliable as death statistics, case statistics, when modelled in conjunction with an "overestimate" parameter, provide a good alternative for improving the forecasting of models, especially in long-range predictions and after the peak of an infection wave.
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2022; v1 submitted 2 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
