Mixed Layer Mesoscales for OGCMs: Model development and assessment with T/P, WOCE and Drifter data
Authors:
V. M. Canuto,
M. S. Dubovikov,
A. Leboissetier
Abstract:
We present a model for mixed layer (ML) mesoscale (M) fluxes of an arbitrary tracer in terms of the resolved fields (mean tracer and mean velocity). The treatment of an arbitrary tracer, rather than only buoyancy, is necessary since OGCMs time step T, S, CO2, etc and not buoyancy. The particular case of buoyancy is used to assess the model results. The paper contains three parts: derivation of the…
▽ More
We present a model for mixed layer (ML) mesoscale (M) fluxes of an arbitrary tracer in terms of the resolved fields (mean tracer and mean velocity). The treatment of an arbitrary tracer, rather than only buoyancy, is necessary since OGCMs time step T, S, CO2, etc and not buoyancy. The particular case of buoyancy is used to assess the model results. The paper contains three parts: derivation of the results, discussion of the results and assessment of the latter using, among others, WOCE, T/P and Drifter data. Derivation. To construct the M fluxes, we first solve the ML M dynamic equations for the velocity and tracer M fields. The goal of the derivation is to emphasize the different treatments of the non-linear terms in the adiabatic vs. diabatic ocean (deep ocean vs. mixed layer). Results. We derive analytic expressions for the following variables: a) vertical and horizontal M fluxes of an arbitrary tracer, b) M diffusivity in terms of the EKE, c) surface value of the EKE in terms of the vertical M buoyancy flux together with a model for the z-profile of the M EKE, d) tapering function T(z) in terms of the large scale variables; vanishes at the surface and tends to unity below the ML where the stream function smoothly connects with the deep ocean GM form, e) new eddy induced velocity. Assessment. a) the vertical flux naturally vanishes at the ocean surface, as physically required, b) the second z-derivative of the buoyancy flux is negative, implying re-stratification, in agreement with eddy resolving simulations, c) the predicted surface EKE compares well with the T/P-Jason-1 altimetry data in both intensity and geographical distribution, d) the predicted z-profile of the EKE compares well with WOCE data, e) the model predicts both the z-profile and the surface values of the M diffusivity, f) the latter is in accord with the Global Drifter and T/P data.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2011;
originally announced June 2011.
Stellar Turbulent Convection: A Selfconsistent Model
Authors:
V. M. Canuto,
I. Goldman,
I. Mazzitelli
Abstract:
We present a selfconsistent model for stellar turbulent convection which is similar in spirit to the CM model (Canuto \& Mazzitelli 1991) since it accounts for the full spectrum of the turbulent eddies rather than only one eddy, as done in the mixing length theory (MLT). The model differs from the CM model in the treatment of the rate of energy input $n_s(k)$ from the source that generates the t…
▽ More
We present a selfconsistent model for stellar turbulent convection which is similar in spirit to the CM model (Canuto \& Mazzitelli 1991) since it accounts for the full spectrum of the turbulent eddies rather than only one eddy, as done in the mixing length theory (MLT). The model differs from the CM model in the treatment of the rate of energy input $n_s(k)$ from the source that generates the turbulence. In the present model, $n_s(k)$ is controlled by both the {\it source} and {\it the turbulence} it ultimately generates, thus ensuring a selfconsistent modeling of the turbulence. This improves the CM model in which $n_s(k)$ was taken to be equal to the growth rate of the {\it linear} unstable convective modes.
However, since the formulation of a selfconsistent treatment is far from simple, we were forced to use a representation of the nonlinear interactions less complete than the one in the CM model. The ensuing equations were solved numerically for a wide range of convective efficiencies. The results are the convective flux, the mean square turbulent velocity, the root mean squared turbulent pressure and the turbulent viscosity.
We implemented the model in the ATON stellar structure code and computed the evolution of a solar model. The results are generally similar to those of the CM model and thus quite different from the MLT. The present model requires a smaller overshoot into the upper radiative zone than does the CM model, in accord with recent empirical estimates. Application to POP II stars and comparison with the very metal-poor globular cluster M68 yields an age in the range $11รท12$ Gyr. This is somewhat younger than the CM age, which in turn is younger than the corresponding MLT age, a result of possible cosmological interest.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 1996;
originally announced September 1996.
