Low-period spacing core-helium burning giants: `hot subdwarf analogues'?
Authors:
S. Hekker,
Y. Elsworth,
T. A. M. Braun,
S. Basu
Abstract:
Global stellar oscillations probe the internal structure of stars. In low- to intermediate-mass red giants, these oscillations provide signatures from both the outer regions of the star as well as from the core. These signatures are imprinted in e.g. the frequency of maximum oscillation power, and in the differences in periods of non-radial oscillations (period spacings), respectively. In core hel…
▽ More
Global stellar oscillations probe the internal structure of stars. In low- to intermediate-mass red giants, these oscillations provide signatures from both the outer regions of the star as well as from the core. These signatures are imprinted in e.g. the frequency of maximum oscillation power, and in the differences in periods of non-radial oscillations (period spacings), respectively. In core helium burning giants with masses below about 1.7 solar masses, i.e. stars that have gone through a helium flash, the asymptotic period spacings take values of about 220 -350 s at frequency of maximum oscillation power of $\sim$30-50 $μ$Hz. A set of stars with asymptotic period spacings lower than about 200 s at similar frequencies separations has recently been discovered by Elsworth and collaborators. In this work, we present a hypothesis for the formation scenario of these stars. We find that these stars can be the result of a mass-loss event at the end of the red-giant branch phase of stars massive enough to not have a degenerate core, i.e. one of the scenarios to form hot subdwarf stars. Therefore, these stars can be classified as `hot subdwarf analogues'. Interestingly, if mass loss continues gradually during the core helium burning phase, these stars turn hotter and denser, and could, therefore, be hot subdwarf progenitors as they shed more of their envelope.
△ Less
Submitted 7 August, 2023; v1 submitted 17 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
Dynamical stellar masses of pre-main sequence stars in Lupus and Taurus obtained with ALMA surveys in comparison with stellar evolutionary models
Authors:
Teresa A. M. Braun,
Hsi-Wei Yen,
Patrick M. Koch,
Carlo F. Manara,
Anna Miotello,
Leonardo Testi
Abstract:
We analysed archival molecular line data of pre-main sequence (PMS) stars in the Lupus and Taurus star-forming regions obtained with ALMA surveys with an integration time of a few minutes per source. We stacked the data of $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O (J = 2-1 & 3-2) and CN (N = 3-2, J = 7/2-5/2) lines to enhance the signal-to-noise ratios, and measured the stellar masses of 45 out of 67 PMS stars from…
▽ More
We analysed archival molecular line data of pre-main sequence (PMS) stars in the Lupus and Taurus star-forming regions obtained with ALMA surveys with an integration time of a few minutes per source. We stacked the data of $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O (J = 2-1 & 3-2) and CN (N = 3-2, J = 7/2-5/2) lines to enhance the signal-to-noise ratios, and measured the stellar masses of 45 out of 67 PMS stars from the Keplerian rotation in their circumstellar disks. The measured dynamical stellar masses were compared to the stellar masses estimated from the spectroscopic measurements with seven different stellar evolutionary models. We found that the magnetic model of Feiden (2016) provides the best estimate of the stellar masses in the mass range of $0.6~M_{\odot}\leq M_{\star} \leq 1.3~M_{\odot}$ with a deviation of $<$0.7$σ$ from the dynamical masses, while all the other models underestimate the stellar masses in this mass range by 20% to 40%. In the mass range of $<0.6~M_{\odot}$, the stellar masses estimated with the magnetic model of Feiden (2016) have a larger deviation ($>2σ$) from the dynamical masses, and other, non-magnetic stellar evolutionary models of Siess et al. (2000), Baraffe et al. (2015) and Feiden (2016) show better agreements with the dynamical masses with the deviations of 1.4$σ$ to 1.6$σ$. Our results show the mass dependence of the accuracy of these stellar evolutionary models.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
