Giving RSEs a Larger Stage through the Better Scientific Software Fellowship
Authors:
William F. Godoy,
Ritu Arora,
Keith Beattie,
David E. Bernholdt,
Sarah E. Bratt,
Daniel S. Katz,
Ignacio Laguna,
Amiya K. Maji,
Addi Malviya Thakur,
Rafael M. Mudafort,
Nitin Sukhija,
Damian Rouson,
Cindy Rubio-González,
Karan Vahi
Abstract:
The Better Scientific Software Fellowship (BSSwF) was launched in 2018 to foster and promote practices, processes, and tools to improve developer productivity and software sustainability of scientific codes. BSSwF's vision is to grow the community with practitioners, leaders, mentors, and consultants to increase the visibility of scientific software production and sustainability. Over the last fiv…
▽ More
The Better Scientific Software Fellowship (BSSwF) was launched in 2018 to foster and promote practices, processes, and tools to improve developer productivity and software sustainability of scientific codes. BSSwF's vision is to grow the community with practitioners, leaders, mentors, and consultants to increase the visibility of scientific software production and sustainability. Over the last five years, many fellowship recipients and honorable mentions have identified as research software engineers (RSEs). This paper provides case studies from several of the program's participants to illustrate some of the diverse ways BSSwF has benefited both the RSE and scientific communities. In an environment where the contributions of RSEs are too often undervalued, we believe that programs such as BSSwF can be a valuable means to recognize and encourage community members to step outside of their regular commitments and expand on their work, collaborations and ideas for a larger audience.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2022; v1 submitted 14 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
Assigning credit to scientific datasets using article citation networks
Authors:
Tong Zeng,
Longfeng Wu,
Sarah Bratt,
Daniel E. Acuna
Abstract:
A citation is a well-established mechanism for connecting scientific artifacts. Citation networks are used by citation analysis for a variety of reasons, prominently to give credit to scientists' work. However, because of current citation practices, scientists tend to cite only publications, leaving out other types of artifacts such as datasets. Datasets then do not get appropriate credit even tho…
▽ More
A citation is a well-established mechanism for connecting scientific artifacts. Citation networks are used by citation analysis for a variety of reasons, prominently to give credit to scientists' work. However, because of current citation practices, scientists tend to cite only publications, leaving out other types of artifacts such as datasets. Datasets then do not get appropriate credit even though they are increasingly reused and experimented with. We develop a network flow measure, called DataRank, aimed at solving this gap. DataRank assigns a relative value to each node in the network based on how citations flow through the graph, differentiating publication and dataset flow rates. We evaluate the quality of DataRank by estimating its accuracy at predicting the usage of real datasets: web visits to GenBank and downloads of Figshare datasets. We show that DataRank is better at predicting this usage compared to alternatives while offering additional interpretable outcomes. We discuss improvements to citation behavior and algorithms to properly track and assign credit to datasets.
△ Less
Submitted 16 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
