-
Object oriented data analysis of surface motion time series in peatland landscapes
Authors:
Emily G. Mitchell,
Ian L. Dryden,
Christopher J. Fallaize,
Roxane Andersen,
Andrew V. Bradley,
David J. Large,
Andrew Sowter
Abstract:
Peatlands account for 10% of UK land area, 80% of which are degraded to some degree, emitting carbon at a similar magnitude to oil refineries or landfill sites. A lack of tools for rapid and reliable assessment of peatland condition has limited monitoring of vast areas of peatland and prevented targeting areas urgently needing action to halt further degradation. Measured using interferometric synt…
▽ More
Peatlands account for 10% of UK land area, 80% of which are degraded to some degree, emitting carbon at a similar magnitude to oil refineries or landfill sites. A lack of tools for rapid and reliable assessment of peatland condition has limited monitoring of vast areas of peatland and prevented targeting areas urgently needing action to halt further degradation. Measured using interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), peatland surface motion is highly indicative of peatland condition, largely driven by the eco-hydrological change in the peatland causing swelling and shrinking of the peat substrate. The computational intensity of recent methods using InSAR time series to capture the annual functional structure of peatland surface motion becomes increasingly challenging as the sample size increases. Instead, we utilize the behavior of the entire peatland surface motion time series using object oriented data analysis to assess peatland condition. In a Gibbs sampling scheme, our cluster analysis based on the functional behavior of the surface motion time series finds features representative of soft/wet peatlands, drier/shrubby peatlands and thin/modified peatlands align with the clusters. The posterior distribution of the assigned peatland types enables the scale of peatland degradation to be assessed, which will guide future cost-effective decisions for peatland restoration.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Shift-Curvature, SGD, and Generalization
Authors:
Arwen V. Bradley,
Carlos Alberto Gomez-Uribe,
Manish Reddy Vuyyuru
Abstract:
A longstanding debate surrounds the related hypotheses that low-curvature minima generalize better, and that SGD discourages curvature. We offer a more complete and nuanced view in support of both. First, we show that curvature harms test performance through two new mechanisms, the shift-curvature and bias-curvature, in addition to a known parameter-covariance mechanism. The three curvature-mediat…
▽ More
A longstanding debate surrounds the related hypotheses that low-curvature minima generalize better, and that SGD discourages curvature. We offer a more complete and nuanced view in support of both. First, we show that curvature harms test performance through two new mechanisms, the shift-curvature and bias-curvature, in addition to a known parameter-covariance mechanism. The three curvature-mediated contributions to test performance are reparametrization-invariant although curvature is not. The shift in the shift-curvature is the line connecting train and test local minima, which differ due to dataset sampling or distribution shift. Although the shift is unknown at training time, the shift-curvature can still be mitigated by minimizing overall curvature. Second, we derive a new, explicit SGD steady-state distribution showing that SGD optimizes an effective potential related to but different from train loss, and that SGD noise mediates a trade-off between deep versus low-curvature regions of this effective potential. Third, combining our test performance analysis with the SGD steady state shows that for small SGD noise, the shift-curvature may be the most significant of the three mechanisms. Our experiments confirm the impact of shift-curvature on test loss, and further explore the relationship between SGD noise and curvature.
△ Less
Submitted 27 July, 2022; v1 submitted 21 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Learning a nonlinear dynamical system model of gene regulation: A perturbed steady-state approach
Authors:
Arwen Vanice Bradley,
Ye Henry Li,
Bokyung Choi,
Wing Hung Wong
Abstract:
Biological structure and function depend on complex regulatory interactions between many genes. A wealth of gene expression data is available from high-throughput genome-wide measurement technologies, but effective gene regulatory network inference methods are still needed. Model-based methods founded on quantitative descriptions of gene regulation are among the most promising, but many such metho…
▽ More
Biological structure and function depend on complex regulatory interactions between many genes. A wealth of gene expression data is available from high-throughput genome-wide measurement technologies, but effective gene regulatory network inference methods are still needed. Model-based methods founded on quantitative descriptions of gene regulation are among the most promising, but many such methods rely on simple, local models or on ad hoc inference approaches lacking experimental interpretability. We propose an experimental design and develop an associated statistical method for inferring a gene network by learning a standard quantitative, interpretable, predictive, biophysics-based ordinary differential equation model of gene regulation. We fit the model parameters using gene expression measurements from perturbed steady-states of the system, like those following overexpression or knockdown experiments. Although the original model is nonlinear, our design allows us to transform it into a convex optimization problem by restricting attention to steady-states and using the lasso for parameter selection. Here, we describe the model and inference algorithm and apply them to a synthetic six-gene system, demonstrating that the model is detailed and flexible enough to account for activation and repression as well as synergistic and self-regulation, and the algorithm can efficiently and accurately recover the parameters used to generate the data.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2016; v1 submitted 12 July, 2012;
originally announced July 2012.
