Skip to main content

Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Bouma, H

.
  1. Flexible image analysis for law enforcement agencies with deep neural networks to determine: where, who and what

    Authors: Henri Bouma, Bart Joosten, Maarten C Kruithof, Maaike H T de Boer, Alexandru Ginsca, Benjamin Labbe, Quoc T Vuong

    Abstract: Due to the increasing need for effective security measures and the integration of cameras in commercial products, a hugeamount of visual data is created today. Law enforcement agencies (LEAs) are inspecting images and videos to findradicalization, propaganda for terrorist organizations and illegal products on darknet markets. This is time consuming.Instead of an undirected search, LEAs would like… ▽ More

    Submitted 15 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

    Journal ref: SPIE - Counterterrorism, Crime Fighting, Forensics, and Surveillance Technologies II, 2018, pp.27

  2. arXiv:2010.03024  [pdf, other

    cs.CV

    Real-Time Resource Allocation for Tracking Systems

    Authors: Yash Satsangi, Shimon Whiteson, Frans A. Oliehoek, Henri Bouma

    Abstract: Automated tracking is key to many computer vision applications. However, many tracking systems struggle to perform in real-time due to the high computational cost of detecting people, especially in ultra high resolution images. We propose a new algorithm called \emph{PartiMax} that greatly reduces this cost by applying the person detector only to the relevant parts of the image. PartiMax exploits… ▽ More

    Submitted 21 September, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

    Comments: http://auai.org/uai2017/proceedings/papers/130.pdf

    Journal ref: UAI 2017

  3. arXiv:1812.10558  [pdf, other

    cs.CV

    Deception Detection by 2D-to-3D Face Reconstruction from Videos

    Authors: Minh Ngô, Burak Mandira, Selim Fırat Yılmaz, Ward Heij, Sezer Karaoglu, Henri Bouma, Hamdi Dibeklioglu, Theo Gevers

    Abstract: Lies and deception are common phenomena in society, both in our private and professional lives. However, humans are notoriously bad at accurate deception detection. Based on the literature, human accuracy of distinguishing between lies and truthful statements is 54% on average, in other words it is slightly better than a random guess. While people do not much care about this issue, in high-stakes… ▽ More

    Submitted 26 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

    Comments: 9 pages, 3 figures