-
Measurements of 10 Scarcely Observed Pairs
Authors:
Matthew B. James,
Graeme L. White,
Roderick R. Letchford,
Stephen G. Bosi
Abstract:
Separation ($ρ$) and Position Angle (PA) measurements are reported of 10 pairs which measures where last reported in the WDS +20 years from epoch of observation 2021.066. Measurements were obtained by direct imaging and are presented with associated measurement uncertainties, as well as, comparisons to measurements determined from Gaia DR2 & EDR3 and historic data extrapolation at epoch of J2000.0…
▽ More
Separation ($ρ$) and Position Angle (PA) measurements are reported of 10 pairs which measures where last reported in the WDS +20 years from epoch of observation 2021.066. Measurements were obtained by direct imaging and are presented with associated measurement uncertainties, as well as, comparisons to measurements determined from Gaia DR2 & EDR3 and historic data extrapolation at epoch of J2000.0.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
High Precision Calibration Pairs for Northern Lucky Imaging
Authors:
Matthew B. James,
Graeme L. White,
Roderick R. Letchford,
Stephen G. Bosi
Abstract:
Presented here is list of 50 pairs quasi-evenly spaced over the northern sky, and that have Separations and Position Angles accurate at the milli-arcsec, and milli-degree level. These pairs are suggested as calibration pairs for lucky imaging observations. This paper is a follow-up to our previous paper regarding southern sky calibration pairs.
Presented here is list of 50 pairs quasi-evenly spaced over the northern sky, and that have Separations and Position Angles accurate at the milli-arcsec, and milli-degree level. These pairs are suggested as calibration pairs for lucky imaging observations. This paper is a follow-up to our previous paper regarding southern sky calibration pairs.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
High Precision Calibration Pairs for Southern Lucky Imaging
Authors:
Matthew B. James,
Graeme L. White,
Roderick R. Letchford,
Stephen Bosi
Abstract:
Accurate measures of double stars require accurate calibration of the instrument. Here we present a list of 50 pairs, that are quasi-evenly spaced over the southern sky, and that have Separations and Position Angles accurate at the milli-arcsec, and milli-degree level. These wide angle pairs are suggested as calibration pairs for lucky imaging observations.
Accurate measures of double stars require accurate calibration of the instrument. Here we present a list of 50 pairs, that are quasi-evenly spaced over the southern sky, and that have Separations and Position Angles accurate at the milli-arcsec, and milli-degree level. These wide angle pairs are suggested as calibration pairs for lucky imaging observations.
△ Less
Submitted 9 November, 2020; v1 submitted 4 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Comparison of Image Scale Calibration Techniques: Known Pairs, Drift Scans and Aperture Grating
Authors:
Matthew B. James,
Graeme L. White,
Stephen G. Bosi,
Rod R. Letchford
Abstract:
We compared several techniques for calibrating angular separation between wide (>1 arcsec) pairs. These techniques are (i) reference pair calibration using α Cen AB orbital parameters, (ii) the video drift method, and (iii) the utilisation of an aperture diffraction grating with red filters of different passbands. Separations of 62 pairs were determined using these 3 calibration techniques and com…
▽ More
We compared several techniques for calibrating angular separation between wide (>1 arcsec) pairs. These techniques are (i) reference pair calibration using α Cen AB orbital parameters, (ii) the video drift method, and (iii) the utilisation of an aperture diffraction grating with red filters of different passbands. Separations of 62 pairs were determined using these 3 calibration techniques and compared. It was found that α Cen AB and video drift methods are in good agreement.
The use of the grating and filter (by measuring fringe spacing) proved unsatisfactory for the broad-band filters, and the use of a narrow band Hα filter with the grating, resulted in image scales that differed from those obtained using α Cen AB reference pair calibration and the video drift method by 0.024 and 0.031 pixel/arcsec (px/arcsec) respectively. A more complete modelling of Fraunhofer diffraction of the Hα filter and grating produced a difference in image scale of 0.009 px/arcsec.
A bias in the diffraction grating method of ~0.1% in the separation of pairs also revealed itself and could not be accounted for. We conclude that calibration against a known pair for which the separation and PA is known with high precision is probably the simplest and best way to undertake image scale calibration.
△ Less
Submitted 9 November, 2020; v1 submitted 29 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Measures of 62 Southern Pairs
Authors:
Matthew James,
Rod Letchford,
Graeme L White,
Meg Emery,
Stephen Bosi
Abstract:
We report lucky imaging observations of 62 pairs at mid-southern declinations sourced from the WDS with separations larger than 4 arc seconds and magnitude less than 10. The measures comprise separations and PA calibrated against Alpha Centauri AB and drift scans, presented as weighted means of these two calibration methods, with formal internal uncertainties δρ= 80 mas and δPA = 0.056(deg). We al…
▽ More
We report lucky imaging observations of 62 pairs at mid-southern declinations sourced from the WDS with separations larger than 4 arc seconds and magnitude less than 10. The measures comprise separations and PA calibrated against Alpha Centauri AB and drift scans, presented as weighted means of these two calibration methods, with formal internal uncertainties δρ= 80 mas and δPA = 0.056(deg). We also compare our measures against 1) extrapolated historic measures, 2) GAIA DR2 data and 3) measures determined from HIPPARCOS and GAIA observations. Our best estimate of our bias against these 3 databases are ρ\approx 10 \pm 30 mas and PA \approx 0.04 \pm 0.08(deg). These formal uncertainties are consistent with the internal uncertainties of δρ= 80 mas and δPA = 0.056(deg). We also report Rectilinear Elements for 61 pairs, Grade 5 Orbital Elements for 5 pairs and suggest 5 pairs as optical doubles (4 of which are new).
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Measures of Ten Sco Doubles and the Determination of Two Orbits
Authors:
Matthew James,
Meg Emery,
Graeme L. White,
Roderick Letchford,
Stephen Bosi
Abstract:
We present measures for 10 pairs in the constellation of Scorpius using a C14 telescope, Lucky Imaging, and the Reduc software. The separations of Alpha Centauri AB, as determined from the orbital elements of Pourbaix and Boffin (2016), were used as an image scale and position angle calibrator. Our internal uncertainties are ~0.06 arcsec in rho and ~0.06 degree in PA. There is excellent agreement…
▽ More
We present measures for 10 pairs in the constellation of Scorpius using a C14 telescope, Lucky Imaging, and the Reduc software. The separations of Alpha Centauri AB, as determined from the orbital elements of Pourbaix and Boffin (2016), were used as an image scale and position angle calibrator. Our internal uncertainties are ~0.06 arcsec in rho and ~0.06 degree in PA. There is excellent agreement with historic data extrapolated to epoch of observation (~2018.53), and micro-arcsecond positions from the GAIA database where the differences are ~0.05 arcsec in rho and ~0.15 degrees in PA. In addition, we present rectilinear elements for the 10 Sco pairs and orbital elements for two of them. Ephemera are given for these pairs based on both the rectilinear elements and the orbital elements.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
