Identifying the occurrence or non occurrence of cognitive bias in situations resembling the Monty Hall problem
Authors:
Fatemeh Borhani,
Edward J. Green
Abstract:
People reason heuristically in situations resembling inferential puzzles such as Bertrand's box paradox and the Monty Hall problem. The practical significance of that fact for economic decision making is uncertain because a departure from sound reasoning may, but does not necessarily, result in a "cognitively biased" outcome different from what sound reasoning would have produced. Criteria are der…
▽ More
People reason heuristically in situations resembling inferential puzzles such as Bertrand's box paradox and the Monty Hall problem. The practical significance of that fact for economic decision making is uncertain because a departure from sound reasoning may, but does not necessarily, result in a "cognitively biased" outcome different from what sound reasoning would have produced. Criteria are derived here, applicable to both experimental and non-experimental situations, for heuristic reasoning in an inferential-puzzle situations to result, or not to result, in cognitively bias. In some situations, neither of these criteria is satisfied, and whether or not agents' posterior probability assessments or choices are cognitively biased cannot be determined.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
A parsimonious theory of evidence-based choice
Authors:
Fatemeh Borhani,
Edward J. Green
Abstract:
That an agent's possible evidential states form a Boolean algebra (on which it is natural to define a probability measure) is an assertion that ideally should be proved, rather than assumed, in justifying rational choice as a representation of expected utility. A more parsimonious, axiomatic characterization of evidence is provided here. Two primitive entities are evidential states and a relation,…
▽ More
That an agent's possible evidential states form a Boolean algebra (on which it is natural to define a probability measure) is an assertion that ideally should be proved, rather than assumed, in justifying rational choice as a representation of expected utility. A more parsimonious, axiomatic characterization of evidence is provided here. Two primitive entities are evidential states and a relation, more specific than, between evidential states. The axioms specify that more-specific-than is a partial order, there is a minimally specific e-state, and more-specific-than is a separative order. Choice alternatives are another primitive entity. A plan is an assignment of a choice alternative to each evidential state. In general, plans satisfying a version of the sure-thing principle cannot be rationalized by expected utility. But there is such a rationalization if the evidential structure is a tree.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2018; v1 submitted 24 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
