Granular surface flows confined between flat, frictional walls. Part 1. Kinematics
Authors:
Patrick Richard,
Alexandre Valance,
Renaud Delannay,
Philippe Boltenhagen
Abstract:
We report and analyse the results of extensive discrete element method simulations of three-dimensional gravity driven flows of cohesionless granular media over an erodible bed, the whole being confined between two flat and frictional sidewalls. We focus on the role of sidewalls by performing simulations for different gap widths ($W$) between the two confining sidewalls: from $5$ to $30$ grain siz…
▽ More
We report and analyse the results of extensive discrete element method simulations of three-dimensional gravity driven flows of cohesionless granular media over an erodible bed, the whole being confined between two flat and frictional sidewalls. We focus on the role of sidewalls by performing simulations for different gap widths ($W$) between the two confining sidewalls: from $5$ to $30$ grain sizes ($d$). Our results indicate the existence of two distinct regimes: regime I for flow angles smaller than the critical angle $θ_c\approx 40^\circ$ and regime II at flow angles larger than $θ_c$ . Regime I corresponds to dense flows whereas flows belonging to regime II exhibit a strong variation of the volume fraction through the depth. Three relevant lengths are identified in the system: $W$ the gap between sidewalls, $l$ the length characterizing the vertical variation of the volume fraction and $h$ a characteristic length associated with the vertical variation of the streamwise velocity. Using these lengths we can rescale the profiles of various flow properties (e.g. streamwise velocity, granular temperature, particle rotation...). In regime II, in contrast to regime I, $l$ and $h$ have a similar behaviour. As a consequence, the rescaled profiles in regime II only involve $h$ (or equivalently $l$) and $W$ . Other dissimilarities exist between regimes I and II. In particular, the scaling of the flow rate with $h$ (at fixed $W$ ) differs in the two regimes, although they display a similar scaling with $W$ (at fixed flow angle).
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2022; v1 submitted 27 April, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
Silo collapse under granular discharge
Authors:
G. Gutiérrez,
C. Colonnello,
P. Boltenhagen,
J. R. Darias,
R. Peralta-Fabi,
F. Brau,
E. Clément
Abstract:
We investigate, at a laboratory scale, the collapse of cylindrical shells of radius $R$ and thickness $t$ induced by a granular discharge. We measure the critical filling height for which the structure fails upon discharge. We observe that the silos sustain filling heights significantly above an estimation obtained by coupling standard shell-buckling and granular stress distribution theories. Two…
▽ More
We investigate, at a laboratory scale, the collapse of cylindrical shells of radius $R$ and thickness $t$ induced by a granular discharge. We measure the critical filling height for which the structure fails upon discharge. We observe that the silos sustain filling heights significantly above an estimation obtained by coupling standard shell-buckling and granular stress distribution theories. Two effects contribute to stabilize the structure: (i) below the critical filling height, a dynamical stabilization due to granular wall friction prevents the localized shell-buckling modes to grow irreversibly; (ii) above the critical filling height, collapse occurs before the downward sliding motion of the whole granular column sets in, such that only a partial friction mobilization is at play. However, we notice also that the critical filling height is reduced as the grain size, $d$, increases. The importance of grain size contribution is controlled by the ratio $d/\sqrt{R t}$. We rationalize these antagonist effects with a novel fluid/structure theory both accounting for the actual status of granular friction at the wall and the inherent shell imperfections mediated by the grains. This theory yields new scaling predictions which are compared with the experimental results.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2014; v1 submitted 3 July, 2012;
originally announced July 2012.
