Remeasuring the anomalously enhanced $B(E2; 2^+ \rightarrow 1^+)$ in $^8\mathrm{Li}$
Authors:
S. L. Henderson,
T. Ahn,
P. J. Fasano,
A. E. McCoy,
S. Aguilar,
D. T. Blankstein,
L. Caves,
A. C. Dombos,
R. K. Grzywacz,
K. L. Jones,
S. **,
R. Kelmar,
J. J. Kolata,
P. D. O'Malley,
C. S. Reingold,
A. Simon,
K. Smith
Abstract:
The large reported $E2$ strength between the $2^+$ ground state and $1^+$ first excited state of $\isotope[8]{Li}$, $B(E2; 2^+ \rightarrow 1^+)= 55(15)\,e^2\fm^4$, presents a puzzle. Unlike in neighboring $A=7\text{--}9$ isotopes, where enhanced $E2$ strengths may be understood to arise from deformation as rotational in-band transitions, the $2^+\rightarrow1^+$ transition in $^8$Li cannot be under…
▽ More
The large reported $E2$ strength between the $2^+$ ground state and $1^+$ first excited state of $\isotope[8]{Li}$, $B(E2; 2^+ \rightarrow 1^+)= 55(15)\,e^2\fm^4$, presents a puzzle. Unlike in neighboring $A=7\text{--}9$ isotopes, where enhanced $E2$ strengths may be understood to arise from deformation as rotational in-band transitions, the $2^+\rightarrow1^+$ transition in $^8$Li cannot be understood in any simple way as a rotational in-band transition. Moreover, the reported strength exceeds \textit{ab initio} predictions by an order of magnitude. In light of this discrepancy, we revisited the Coulomb excitation measurement of this strength, now using particle-$γ$ coincidences, yielding a revised $B(E2; 2^+ \rightarrow 1^+)$ of $19(^{+7}_{-6})(2)$~e$^2$fm$^4$. We explore how this value compares to what might be expected in the limits of rotational models. While the present value is about a factor of three smaller than previously reported, it remains anomalously enhanced.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2023; v1 submitted 13 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
