-
MedPerf: Open Benchmarking Platform for Medical Artificial Intelligence using Federated Evaluation
Authors:
Alexandros Karargyris,
Renato Umeton,
Micah J. Sheller,
Alejandro Aristizabal,
Johnu George,
Srini Bala,
Daniel J. Beutel,
Victor Bittorf,
Akshay Chaudhari,
Alexander Chowdhury,
Cody Coleman,
Bala Desinghu,
Gregory Diamos,
Debo Dutta,
Diane Feddema,
Grigori Fursin,
Junyi Guo,
Xinyuan Huang,
David Kanter,
Satyananda Kashyap,
Nicholas Lane,
Indranil Mallick,
Pietro Mascagni,
Virendra Mehta,
Vivek Natarajan
, et al. (17 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Medical AI has tremendous potential to advance healthcare by supporting the evidence-based practice of medicine, personalizing patient treatment, reducing costs, and improving provider and patient experience. We argue that unlocking this potential requires a systematic way to measure the performance of medical AI models on large-scale heterogeneous data. To meet this need, we are building MedPerf,…
▽ More
Medical AI has tremendous potential to advance healthcare by supporting the evidence-based practice of medicine, personalizing patient treatment, reducing costs, and improving provider and patient experience. We argue that unlocking this potential requires a systematic way to measure the performance of medical AI models on large-scale heterogeneous data. To meet this need, we are building MedPerf, an open framework for benchmarking machine learning in the medical domain. MedPerf will enable federated evaluation in which models are securely distributed to different facilities for evaluation, thereby empowering healthcare organizations to assess and verify the performance of AI models in an efficient and human-supervised process, while prioritizing privacy. We describe the current challenges healthcare and AI communities face, the need for an open platform, the design philosophy of MedPerf, its current implementation status, and our roadmap. We call for researchers and organizations to join us in creating the MedPerf open benchmarking platform.
△ Less
Submitted 28 December, 2021; v1 submitted 29 September, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
MLPerf Training Benchmark
Authors:
Peter Mattson,
Christine Cheng,
Cody Coleman,
Greg Diamos,
Paulius Micikevicius,
David Patterson,
Hanlin Tang,
Gu-Yeon Wei,
Peter Bailis,
Victor Bittorf,
David Brooks,
Dehao Chen,
Debojyoti Dutta,
Udit Gupta,
Kim Hazelwood,
Andrew Hock,
Xinyuan Huang,
Atsushi Ike,
Bill Jia,
Daniel Kang,
David Kanter,
Naveen Kumar,
Jeffery Liao,
Guokai Ma,
Deepak Narayanan
, et al. (12 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Machine learning (ML) needs industry-standard performance benchmarks to support design and competitive evaluation of the many emerging software and hardware solutions for ML. But ML training presents three unique benchmarking challenges absent from other domains: optimizations that improve training throughput can increase the time to solution, training is stochastic and time to solution exhibits h…
▽ More
Machine learning (ML) needs industry-standard performance benchmarks to support design and competitive evaluation of the many emerging software and hardware solutions for ML. But ML training presents three unique benchmarking challenges absent from other domains: optimizations that improve training throughput can increase the time to solution, training is stochastic and time to solution exhibits high variance, and software and hardware systems are so diverse that fair benchmarking with the same binary, code, and even hyperparameters is difficult. We therefore present MLPerf, an ML benchmark that overcomes these challenges. Our analysis quantitatively evaluates MLPerf's efficacy at driving performance and scalability improvements across two rounds of results from multiple vendors.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2020; v1 submitted 2 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
An Approximate, Efficient Solver for LP Rounding
Authors:
Srikrishna Sridhar,
Victor Bittorf,
Ji Liu,
Ce Zhang,
Christopher Ré,
Stephen J. Wright
Abstract:
Many problems in machine learning can be solved by rounding the solution of an appropriate linear program (LP). This paper shows that we can recover solutions of comparable quality by rounding an approximate LP solution instead of the ex- act one. These approximate LP solutions can be computed efficiently by applying a parallel stochastic-coordinate-descent method to a quadratic-penalty formulatio…
▽ More
Many problems in machine learning can be solved by rounding the solution of an appropriate linear program (LP). This paper shows that we can recover solutions of comparable quality by rounding an approximate LP solution instead of the ex- act one. These approximate LP solutions can be computed efficiently by applying a parallel stochastic-coordinate-descent method to a quadratic-penalty formulation of the LP. We derive worst-case runtime and solution quality guarantees of this scheme using novel perturbation and convergence analysis. Our experiments demonstrate that on such combinatorial problems as vertex cover, independent set and multiway-cut, our approximate rounding scheme is up to an order of magnitude faster than Cplex (a commercial LP solver) while producing solutions of similar quality.
△ Less
Submitted 16 November, 2013; v1 submitted 11 November, 2013;
originally announced November 2013.
-
An Asynchronous Parallel Stochastic Coordinate Descent Algorithm
Authors:
Ji Liu,
Stephen J. Wright,
Christopher Ré,
Victor Bittorf,
Srikrishna Sridhar
Abstract:
We describe an asynchronous parallel stochastic coordinate descent algorithm for minimizing smooth unconstrained or separably constrained functions. The method achieves a linear convergence rate on functions that satisfy an essential strong convexity property and a sublinear rate ($1/K$) on general convex functions. Near-linear speedup on a multicore system can be expected if the number of process…
▽ More
We describe an asynchronous parallel stochastic coordinate descent algorithm for minimizing smooth unconstrained or separably constrained functions. The method achieves a linear convergence rate on functions that satisfy an essential strong convexity property and a sublinear rate ($1/K$) on general convex functions. Near-linear speedup on a multicore system can be expected if the number of processors is $O(n^{1/2})$ in unconstrained optimization and $O(n^{1/4})$ in the separable-constrained case, where $n$ is the number of variables. We describe results from implementation on 40-core processors.
△ Less
Submitted 10 November, 2014; v1 submitted 7 November, 2013;
originally announced November 2013.
-
Factoring nonnegative matrices with linear programs
Authors:
Victor Bittorf,
Benjamin Recht,
Christopher Re,
Joel A. Tropp
Abstract:
This paper describes a new approach, based on linear programming, for computing nonnegative matrix factorizations (NMFs). The key idea is a data-driven model for the factorization where the most salient features in the data are used to express the remaining features. More precisely, given a data matrix X, the algorithm identifies a matrix C such that X approximately equals CX and some linear const…
▽ More
This paper describes a new approach, based on linear programming, for computing nonnegative matrix factorizations (NMFs). The key idea is a data-driven model for the factorization where the most salient features in the data are used to express the remaining features. More precisely, given a data matrix X, the algorithm identifies a matrix C such that X approximately equals CX and some linear constraints. The constraints are chosen to ensure that the matrix C selects features; these features can then be used to find a low-rank NMF of X. A theoretical analysis demonstrates that this approach has guarantees similar to those of the recent NMF algorithm of Arora et al. (2012). In contrast with this earlier work, the proposed method extends to more general noise models and leads to efficient, scalable algorithms. Experiments with synthetic and real datasets provide evidence that the new approach is also superior in practice. An optimized C++ implementation can factor a multigigabyte matrix in a matter of minutes.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2013; v1 submitted 6 June, 2012;
originally announced June 2012.