-
Equivalence of Active and Passive Gravitational Mass Tested with Lunar Laser Ranging
Authors:
Vishwa Vijay Singh,
Jürgen Müller,
Liliane Biskupek,
Eva Hackmann,
Claus Lämmerzahl
Abstract:
LLR measures the distance between observatories on Earth and retro-reflectors on Moon since 1969. In this paper, we study the possible violation of the equality of passive and active gravitational mass ($m_{a}/m_{p}$), for Aluminium (Al) and Iron (Fe), using LLR data. Our new limit of $3.9\cdot10^{-14}$ is about 100 times better than that of Bartlett and Van Buren [1986] reflecting the benefit of…
▽ More
LLR measures the distance between observatories on Earth and retro-reflectors on Moon since 1969. In this paper, we study the possible violation of the equality of passive and active gravitational mass ($m_{a}/m_{p}$), for Aluminium (Al) and Iron (Fe), using LLR data. Our new limit of $3.9\cdot10^{-14}$ is about 100 times better than that of Bartlett and Van Buren [1986] reflecting the benefit of the many years of LLR data.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Earth rotation parameter estimation from LLR and impact of non-tidal station loading
Authors:
Vishwa Vijay Singh,
Liliane Biskupek,
Jürgen Müller,
Mingyue Zhang
Abstract:
LLR measures the distance between observatories on Earth and retro-reflectors on Moon since 1969. In this paper, we estimate the Earth Rotation Parameters (ERP; terrestrial pole offsets, $x_p$ and $y_p$, and Earth rotation phase, $Δ$UT) using LLR data. We estimate the values of $Δ$UT, and the pole offsets separately. For the pole offsets, we estimate the values of $x_p$ and $y_p$ together and sepa…
▽ More
LLR measures the distance between observatories on Earth and retro-reflectors on Moon since 1969. In this paper, we estimate the Earth Rotation Parameters (ERP; terrestrial pole offsets, $x_p$ and $y_p$, and Earth rotation phase, $Δ$UT) using LLR data. We estimate the values of $Δ$UT, and the pole offsets separately. For the pole offsets, we estimate the values of $x_p$ and $y_p$ together and separately. Overall, the uncertainties of ERP from the new LLR data (after 2000.0) have significantly improved, staying less than 20 $μ$s for $Δ$UT, less than 2.5 mas for $x_p$, and less than 3 mas for $y_p$ for nights selected from subsets of the LLR time series which have 10 and 15 normal points obtained per night. Furthermore, we add the non-tidal loading effect provided by the IMLS, as observation level corrections of the LLR observatories in the analysis. This effect causes deformations of the Earth surface up to the centimetre level. Its addition in the Institute of Geodesy (IfE) LLR model, leads to a marginal improvement in the uncertainties (3-$σ$ values) of about 1% for both, $Δ$UT and the pole offsets.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Benefit of New High-Precision LLR Data for the Determination of Relativistic Parameters
Authors:
Liliane Biskupek,
Jürgen Müller,
Jean-Marie Torre
Abstract:
Since 1969, Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) data have been collected by various observatories and analysed by different analysis groups. In the recent years, observations with bigger telescopes (APOLLO) and at infra-red wavelength (OCA) are carried out, resulting in a better distribution of precise LLR data over the lunar orbit and the observed retro-reflectors on the Moon. This is a great advantage for…
▽ More
Since 1969, Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) data have been collected by various observatories and analysed by different analysis groups. In the recent years, observations with bigger telescopes (APOLLO) and at infra-red wavelength (OCA) are carried out, resulting in a better distribution of precise LLR data over the lunar orbit and the observed retro-reflectors on the Moon. This is a great advantage for various investigations in the LLR analysis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefit of the new LLR data for the determination of relativistic parameters. Here we show current results for relativistic parameters like a possible temporal variation of the gravitational constant $\dot{G}/G_0 = (-5.0 \pm 9.6) \times 10^{-15} \, \mathrm{yr}^{-1}$, the equivalence principle with $Δ\left(m_g/m_i\right)_{\mathrm{EM}} = (-2.1 \pm 2.4)\times10^{-14}$ and the PPN parameters $β-1 = (6.2 \pm 7.2) \times 10^{-5}$ and $γ-1 = (1.7 \pm 1.6) \times 10^{-4}$. The results show a significant improvement in the accuracy of the various parameters, mainly due to better coverage of the lunar orbit, better distribution of measurements over the lunar retro-reflectors, and last but not least, higher accuracy of the data. Within the estimated accuracies, no violation of Einstein's theory is found and the results set improved limits for the different effects.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Impact of non-tidal station loading in LLR
Authors:
Vishwa Vijay Singh,
Liliane Biskupek,
Jürgen Müller,
Mingyue Zhang
Abstract:
Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) measures the distance between observatories on Earth and retro-reflectors on Moon since 1970. In this paper, we study the effect of non-tidal station loading (NTSL) in the analysis of LLR data. We add the non-tidal loading effect provided by three data centres: the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ), the International Mass Loading Service (IMLS) and EOST loading…
▽ More
Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) measures the distance between observatories on Earth and retro-reflectors on Moon since 1970. In this paper, we study the effect of non-tidal station loading (NTSL) in the analysis of LLR data. We add the non-tidal loading effect provided by three data centres: the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ), the International Mass Loading Service (IMLS) and EOST loading service of University of Strasbourg in France, as observation level corrections of the LLR observatories in our analysis. This effect causes deformations of the Earth surface up to the centimetre level. Its addition in the Institute of Geodesy (IfE) LLR model, it leads to a change in the uncertainties (3-sigma values) of the station coordinates resulting in up to a 0.60% improvement, an improvement in the post-fit LLR residuals of up to 9%, and a decrease in the power of the annual signal in the LLR post-fit residuals of up to 57%.
△ Less
Submitted 10 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Extending Science from Lunar Laser Ranging
Authors:
Vishnu Viswanathan,
Erwan Mazarico,
Stephen Merkowitz,
James G. Williams,
Slava G. Turyshev,
Douglas G. Currie,
Anton I. Ermakov,
Nicolas Rambaux,
Agnès Fienga,
Clément Courde,
Julien Chabé,
Jean-Marie Torre,
Adrien Bourgoin,
Ulrich Schreiber,
Thomas M. Eubanks,
Chensheng Wu,
Daniele Dequal,
Simone Dell'Agnello,
Liliane Biskupek,
Jürgen Müller,
Sergei Kopeikin
Abstract:
The Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) experiment has accumulated 50 years of range data of improving accuracy from ground stations to the laser retroreflector arrays (LRAs) on the lunar surface. The upcoming decade offers several opportunities to break new ground in data precision through the deployment of the next generation of single corner-cube lunar retroreflectors and active laser transponders. This…
▽ More
The Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) experiment has accumulated 50 years of range data of improving accuracy from ground stations to the laser retroreflector arrays (LRAs) on the lunar surface. The upcoming decade offers several opportunities to break new ground in data precision through the deployment of the next generation of single corner-cube lunar retroreflectors and active laser transponders. This is likely to expand the LLR station network. Lunar dynamical models and analysis tools have the potential to improve and fully exploit the long temporal baseline and precision allowed by millimetric LLR data. Some of the model limitations are outlined for future efforts. Differential observation techniques will help mitigate some of the primary limiting factors and reach unprecedented accuracy. Such observations and techniques may enable the detection of several subtle signatures required to understand the dynamics of the Earth-Moon system and the deep lunar interior. LLR model improvements would impact multi-disciplinary fields that include lunar and planetary science, Earth science, fundamental physics, celestial mechanics and ephemerides.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Modeling approaches for precise relativistic orbits: Analytical, Lie-series, and pN approximation
Authors:
Dennis Philipp,
Florian Wöske,
Liliane Biskupek,
Eva Hackmann,
Enrico Mai,
Meike List,
Claus Lämmerzahl,
Benny Rievers
Abstract:
Accurate orbit modeling plays a key role in contemporary and future space missions such as GRACE and its successor GRACE-FO, GNSS, and altimetry missions. To fully exploit the technological capabilities and correctly interpret measurements, relativistic orbital effects need to be taken into account. Within the theory of General Relativity, equations of motion for freely falling test objects, such…
▽ More
Accurate orbit modeling plays a key role in contemporary and future space missions such as GRACE and its successor GRACE-FO, GNSS, and altimetry missions. To fully exploit the technological capabilities and correctly interpret measurements, relativistic orbital effects need to be taken into account. Within the theory of General Relativity, equations of motion for freely falling test objects, such as satellites orbiting the Earth, are given by the geodesic equation. We analyze and compare different solution methods in a spherically symmetric background, i.e. for the Schwarzschild spacetime, as a test bed. We investigate satellite orbits and use direct numerical orbit integration as well as the semi-analytical Lie-series approach. The results are compared to the exact analytical reference solution in terms of elliptic functions. For a set of exemplary orbits, we determine the respective accuracy of the different methods. Within the post-Newtonian approximation of General Relativity, modified orbital equations are obtained by adding relativistic corrections to the Newtonian equations of motion. We analyze the accuracy of this approximation with respect to the general relativistic setting. Therefore, we solve the post-Newtonian equation of motion using the eXtended High Performance Satellite dynamics Simulator. For corresponding initial conditions, we compare orbits in the Schwarzschild spacetime to those in its post-Newtonian approximation. Moreover, we compare the magnitude of relativistic contributions to several typical perturbations of satellite orbits due to, e.g., solar radiation pressure, Earth's albedo, and atmospheric drag. This comparison is done for our test scenarios and for a real GRACE orbit to highlight the importance of relativistic effects in geodetic space missions.
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2019; v1 submitted 15 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
-
Interests of a new lunar laser instrumentation on the ESO NTT Telescope
Authors:
A. Fienga,
C. Courde,
J. M. Torre,
H. Manche,
T. Murphy,
J. Mueller,
J. Laskar,
S. Bouquillon,
L. Biskupek,
F. Hofmann,
N. Capitaine,
N. Rambaux
Abstract:
We analyze the impact of the installation of a lunar laser ranging device on the NTT 3.6m ESO telescope. With such an instrument, the scientific communities of fundamental physics and solar system formation will highly benefit of the only LLR station in the Southern Hemisphere. The quality of the NTT 3.6 meter telescope will also greatly complement the LLR 3.5 meter Apache Point telescope (3.5 m)…
▽ More
We analyze the impact of the installation of a lunar laser ranging device on the NTT 3.6m ESO telescope. With such an instrument, the scientific communities of fundamental physics and solar system formation will highly benefit of the only LLR station in the Southern Hemisphere. The quality of the NTT 3.6 meter telescope will also greatly complement the LLR 3.5 meter Apache Point telescope (3.5 m) instrument in the Northern Hemisphere (USA) which is the best instrument for tracking the Moon since 2006. Finally, we also consider the technical characteristics of such installation including the observational constraints.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2014; v1 submitted 2 May, 2014;
originally announced May 2014.
