Distributionally robust tail bounds based on Wasserstein distance and $f$-divergence
Authors:
Corina Birghila,
Maximilian Aigner,
Sebastian Engelke
Abstract:
In this work, we provide robust bounds on the tail probabilities and the tail index of heavy-tailed distributions in the context of model misspecification. They are defined as the optimal value when computing the worst-case tail behavior over all models within some neighborhood of the reference model. The choice of the discrepancy between the models used to build this neighborhood plays a crucial…
▽ More
In this work, we provide robust bounds on the tail probabilities and the tail index of heavy-tailed distributions in the context of model misspecification. They are defined as the optimal value when computing the worst-case tail behavior over all models within some neighborhood of the reference model. The choice of the discrepancy between the models used to build this neighborhood plays a crucial role in assessing the size of the asymptotic bounds. We evaluate the robust tail behavior in ambiguity sets based on the Wasserstein distance and Csiszár $f$-divergence and obtain explicit expressions for the corresponding asymptotic bounds. In an application to Danish fire insurance claims we compare the difference between these bounds and show the importance of the choice of discrepancy measure.
△ Less
Submitted 11 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
Optimal Insurance under Maxmin Expected Utility
Authors:
Corina Birghila,
Tim J. Boonen,
Mario Ghossoub
Abstract:
We examine a problem of demand for insurance indemnification, when the insured is sensitive to ambiguity and behaves according to the Maxmin-Expected Utility model of Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989), whereas the insurer is a (risk-averse or risk-neutral) Expected-Utility maximizer. We characterize optimal indemnity functions both with and without the customary ex ante no-sabotage requirement on feasi…
▽ More
We examine a problem of demand for insurance indemnification, when the insured is sensitive to ambiguity and behaves according to the Maxmin-Expected Utility model of Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989), whereas the insurer is a (risk-averse or risk-neutral) Expected-Utility maximizer. We characterize optimal indemnity functions both with and without the customary ex ante no-sabotage requirement on feasible indemnities, and for both concave and linear utility functions for the two agents. This allows us to provide a unifying framework in which we examine the effects of the no-sabotage condition, marginal utility of wealth, belief heterogeneity, as well as ambiguity (multiplicity of priors) on the structure of optimal indemnity functions. In particular, we show how the singularity in beliefs leads to an optimal indemnity function that involves full insurance on an event to which the insurer assigns zero probability, while the decision maker assigns a positive probability. We examine several illustrative examples, and we provide numerical studies for the case of a Wasserstein and a Renyi ambiguity set.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
Blow up of conductors
Authors:
Corina Birghila,
Mathias Schulze
Abstract:
We generalize results of P.M.H. Wilson describing situations where the blow up of the conductor ideal of a scheme coincides with the normalization.
We generalize results of P.M.H. Wilson describing situations where the blow up of the conductor ideal of a scheme coincides with the normalization.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2018; v1 submitted 16 August, 2016;
originally announced August 2016.
