Proteomics Standards Initiatives ProForma 2.0 Unifying the encoding of Proteoforms and Peptidoforms
Authors:
Richard D. LeDuc,
Eric W. Deutsch,
Pierre-Alain Binz,
Ryan T. Fellers,
Anthony J. Cesnik,
Joshua A. Klein,
Tim Van Den Bossche,
Ralf Gabriels,
Arshika Yalavarthi,
Yasset Perez-Riverol,
Jeremy Carver,
Wout Bittremieux,
Shin Kawano,
Benjamin Pullman,
Nuno Bandeira,
Neil L. Kelleher,
Paul M. Thomas,
Juan Antonio Vizcaíno
Abstract:
There is the need to represent in a standard manner all the possible variations of a protein or peptide primary sequence, including both artefactual and post-translational modifications of peptides and proteins. With that overall aim, here, the Human Proteome Organization (HUPO) Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI) has developed a notation, called ProForma 2.0, which is a substantial extension of…
▽ More
There is the need to represent in a standard manner all the possible variations of a protein or peptide primary sequence, including both artefactual and post-translational modifications of peptides and proteins. With that overall aim, here, the Human Proteome Organization (HUPO) Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI) has developed a notation, called ProForma 2.0, which is a substantial extension of the original ProForma notation, developed by the Consortium for Top-Down Proteomics (CTDP). ProForma 2.0 aims to unify the representation of proteoforms and peptidoforms. Therefore, this notation supports use cases needed for bottom-up and middle/topdown proteomics approaches and allows the encoding of highly modified proteins and peptides using a human and machine-readable string. ProForma 2.0 covers encoding protein modification names and accessions, cross-linking reagents including disulfides, glycans, modifications encoded using mass shifts and/or via chemical formulas, labile and C or N-terminal modifications, ambiguity in the modification position and representation of atomic isotopes, among other use cases. Notational conventions are based on public controlled vocabularies and ontologies. Detailed information about the notation and existing implementations are available at http://www.psidev.info/proforma and at the corresponding GitHub repository (https://github.com/HUPO-PSI/proforma).
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2022; v1 submitted 23 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
Guidelines for reporting the use of gel electrophoresis in proteomics
Authors:
Frank Gibson,
Leigh Anderson,
Gyorgy Babnigg,
Mark Baker,
Matthias Berth,
Pierre-Alain Binz,
Andy Borthwick,
Phil Cash,
Billy W Day,
David B Friedman,
Donita Garland,
Howard B Gutstein,
Christine Hoogland,
Neil A Jones,
Alamgir Khan,
Joachim Klose,
Angus I Lamond,
Peter F Lemkin,
Kathryn S Lilley,
Jonathan Minden,
Nicholas J Morris,
Norman W Paton,
Michael R Pisano,
John E Prime,
Thierry Rabilloud
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
the MIAPE Gel Electrophoresis (MIAPE-GE) guidelines specify the minimum information that should be provided when reporting the use of n-dimensional gel electrophoresis in a proteomics experiment. Developed through a joint effort between the gel-based analysis working group of the Human Proteome Organisation's Proteomics Standards Initiative (HUPO-PSI; http://www.psidev.info/) and the wider prote…
▽ More
the MIAPE Gel Electrophoresis (MIAPE-GE) guidelines specify the minimum information that should be provided when reporting the use of n-dimensional gel electrophoresis in a proteomics experiment. Developed through a joint effort between the gel-based analysis working group of the Human Proteome Organisation's Proteomics Standards Initiative (HUPO-PSI; http://www.psidev.info/) and the wider proteomics community, they constitute one part of the overall Minimum Information about a Proteomics Experiment (MIAPE) documentation system published last August in Nature Biotechnology
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2009;
originally announced April 2009.
