No evidence for missing covariance in the Pantheon+ SuperNova sample distance moduli
Authors:
Bohdan Bidenko,
Léon V. E. Koopmans,
P. Daniel Meerburg
Abstract:
Inspired by the discussion in the community on possible hidden systematic errors in late universe cosmological probes and non-trivial physical models developed to reduce the Hubble tension, we investigate the Pantheon and Pantheon+ SNe samples for possible deviations from the original $Λ$CDM analysis. To simultaneously account for possible systematics or deviations from $Λ$CDM, we adopt Gaussian p…
▽ More
Inspired by the discussion in the community on possible hidden systematic errors in late universe cosmological probes and non-trivial physical models developed to reduce the Hubble tension, we investigate the Pantheon and Pantheon+ SNe samples for possible deviations from the original $Λ$CDM analysis. To simultaneously account for possible systematics or deviations from $Λ$CDM, we adopt Gaussian processes to model additional covariance while making no further assumptions on their origin. We explore both stationary and non-stationarity corrections to the covariance. While small changes in the inferred cosmological parameters $H_0$ and $Ω_{m}$ can occur, we find no statistically significant evidence for missing covariance. We find an upper limit for the Gaussian processes amplitude $σ< 0.031$ mag with $95\%$ confidence, which corresponds to $20\%$ of the average statistical error in the Pantheon+ sample. The strongest effect we find on the inferred cosmological parameter posterior can reduce the statistical significance of the Hubble tension between Pantheon+ and Planck estimates from 5.3$σ$ to 4.5$σ$. Therefore, we conclude that the SN cosmological parameter inference is robust against the analysis modifications studied in this work.
△ Less
Submitted 9 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies
Authors:
Elcio Abdalla,
Guillermo Franco Abellán,
Amin Aboubrahim,
Adriano Agnello,
Ozgur Akarsu,
Yashar Akrami,
George Alestas,
Daniel Aloni,
Luca Amendola,
Luis A. Anchordoqui,
Richard I. Anderson,
Nikki Arendse,
Marika Asgari,
Mario Ballardini,
Vernon Barger,
Spyros Basilakos,
Ronaldo C. Batista,
Elia S. Battistelli,
Richard Battye,
Micol Benetti,
David Benisty,
Asher Berlin,
Paolo de Bernardis,
Emanuele Berti,
Bohdan Bidenko
, et al. (178 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this paper we will list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, also taking into account the current discordances between the different cosmological probes, such as the disagreement in the value of the Hubble constant $H_0$, the $σ_8$--$S_8$ tension, and other less statistically significant anomalies. While these discordances can still be in part the result of system…
▽ More
In this paper we will list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, also taking into account the current discordances between the different cosmological probes, such as the disagreement in the value of the Hubble constant $H_0$, the $σ_8$--$S_8$ tension, and other less statistically significant anomalies. While these discordances can still be in part the result of systematic errors, their persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the necessity for new physics or generalisations beyond the standard model. In this paper, we focus on the $5.0\,σ$ tension between the {\it Planck} CMB estimate of the Hubble constant $H_0$ and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the $H_0$ evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we list a few interesting new physics models that could alleviate this tension and discuss how the next decade's experiments will be crucial. Moreover, we focus on the tension of the {\it Planck} CMB data with weak lensing measurements and redshift surveys, about the value of the matter energy density $Ω_m$, and the amplitude or rate of the growth of structure ($σ_8,fσ_8$). We list a few interesting models proposed for alleviating this tension, and we discuss the importance of trying to fit a full array of data with a single model and not just one parameter at a time. Additionally, we present a wide range of other less discussed anomalies at a statistical significance level lower than the $H_0$--$S_8$ tensions which may also constitute hints towards new physics, and we discuss possible generic theoretical approaches that can collectively explain the non-standard nature of these signals.[Abridged]
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2022; v1 submitted 11 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
