Skip to main content

Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Bicknell, K

.
  1. arXiv:2406.03030  [pdf, other

    cs.CL cs.LG

    From Tarzan to Tolkien: Controlling the Language Proficiency Level of LLMs for Content Generation

    Authors: Ali Malik, Stephen Mayhew, Chris Piech, Klinton Bicknell

    Abstract: We study the problem of controlling the difficulty level of text generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) for contexts where end-users are not fully proficient, such as language learners. Using a novel framework, we evaluate the effectiveness of several key approaches for this task, including few-shot prompting, supervised finetuning, and reinforcement learning (RL), utilising both GPT-4 and open… ▽ More

    Submitted 5 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

    Journal ref: In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2024)

  2. arXiv:2402.16877  [pdf, other

    cs.IR cs.AI cs.CL cs.LG

    Large Language Model Augmented Exercise Retrieval for Personalized Language Learning

    Authors: Austin Xu, Will Monroe, Klinton Bicknell

    Abstract: We study the problem of zero-shot exercise retrieval in the context of online language learning, to give learners the ability to explicitly request personalized exercises via natural language. Using real-world data collected from language learners, we observe that vector similarity approaches poorly capture the relationship between exercise content and the language that learners use to express wha… ▽ More

    Submitted 8 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

    Comments: Presented at Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2024. 11 pages, 4 figures, 5 tables

  3. arXiv:2103.04469  [pdf, other

    cs.CL cs.LG

    Local word statistics affect reading times independently of surprisal

    Authors: Adam Goodkind, Klinton Bicknell

    Abstract: Surprisal theory has provided a unifying framework for understanding many phenomena in sentence processing (Hale, 2001; Levy, 2008a), positing that a word's conditional probability given all prior context fully determines processing difficulty. Problematically for this claim, one local statistic, word frequency, has also been shown to affect processing, even when conditional probability given cont… ▽ More

    Submitted 14 March, 2021; v1 submitted 7 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

    Comments: 10 pages, 3 figures