-
Observer study-based evaluation of TGAN architecture used to generate oncological PET images
Authors:
Roberto Fedrigo,
Fereshteh Yousefirizi,
Zi** Liu,
Abhinav K. Jha,
Robert V. Bergen,
Jean-Francois Rajotte,
Raymond T. Ng,
Ingrid Bloise,
Sara Harsini,
Dan J. Kadrmas,
Carlos Uribe,
Arman Rahmim
Abstract:
The application of computer-vision algorithms in medical imaging has increased rapidly in recent years. However, algorithm training is challenging due to limited sample sizes, lack of labeled samples, as well as privacy concerns regarding data sharing. To address these issues, we previously developed (Bergen et al. 2022) a synthetic PET dataset for Head and Neck (H and N) cancer using the temporal…
▽ More
The application of computer-vision algorithms in medical imaging has increased rapidly in recent years. However, algorithm training is challenging due to limited sample sizes, lack of labeled samples, as well as privacy concerns regarding data sharing. To address these issues, we previously developed (Bergen et al. 2022) a synthetic PET dataset for Head and Neck (H and N) cancer using the temporal generative adversarial network (TGAN) architecture and evaluated its performance segmenting lesions and identifying radiomics features in synthesized images. In this work, a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) observer study was performed to quantitatively evaluate the ability of human observers to distinguish between real and synthesized oncological PET images. In the study eight trained readers, including two board-certified nuclear medicine physicians, read 170 real/synthetic image pairs presented as 2D-transaxial using a dedicated web app. For each image pair, the observer was asked to identify the real image and input their confidence level with a 5-point Likert scale. P-values were computed using the binomial test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A heat map was used to compare the response accuracy distribution for the signed-rank test. Response accuracy for all observers ranged from 36.2% [27.9-44.4] to 63.1% [54.8-71.3]. Six out of eight observers did not identify the real image with statistical significance, indicating that the synthetic dataset was reasonably representative of oncological PET images. Overall, this study adds validity to the realism of our simulated H&N cancer dataset, which may be implemented in the future to train AI algorithms while favoring patient confidentiality and privacy protection.
△ Less
Submitted 27 November, 2023; v1 submitted 27 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Assessing Privacy Leakage in Synthetic 3-D PET Imaging using Transversal GAN
Authors:
Robert V. Bergen,
Jean-Francois Rajotte,
Fereshteh Yousefirizi,
Arman Rahmim,
Raymond T. Ng
Abstract:
Training computer-vision related algorithms on medical images for disease diagnosis or image segmentation is difficult in large part due to privacy concerns. For this reason, generative image models are highly sought after to facilitate data sharing. However, 3-D generative models are understudied, and investigation of their privacy leakage is needed. We introduce our 3-D generative model, Transve…
▽ More
Training computer-vision related algorithms on medical images for disease diagnosis or image segmentation is difficult in large part due to privacy concerns. For this reason, generative image models are highly sought after to facilitate data sharing. However, 3-D generative models are understudied, and investigation of their privacy leakage is needed. We introduce our 3-D generative model, Transversal GAN (TrGAN), using head & neck PET images which are conditioned on tumour masks as a case study. We define quantitative measures of image fidelity, utility and privacy for our model. These metrics are evaluated in the course of training to identify ideal fidelity, utility and privacy trade-offs and establish the relationships between these parameters. We show that the discriminator of the TrGAN is vulnerable to attack, and that an attacker can identify which samples were used in training with almost perfect accuracy (AUC = 0.99). We also show that an attacker with access to only the generator cannot reliably classify whether a sample had been used for training (AUC = 0.51). This suggests that TrGAN generators, but not discriminators, may be used for sharing synthetic 3-D PET data with minimal privacy risk while maintaining good utility and fidelity.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2023; v1 submitted 13 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
3-D PET Image Generation with tumour masks using TGAN
Authors:
Robert V Bergen,
Jean-Francois Rajotte,
Fereshteh Yousefirizi,
Ivan S Klyuzhin,
Arman Rahmim,
Raymond T. Ng
Abstract:
Training computer-vision related algorithms on medical images for disease diagnosis or image segmentation is difficult due to the lack of training data, labeled samples, and privacy concerns. For this reason, a robust generative method to create synthetic data is highly sought after. However, most three-dimensional image generators require additional image input or are extremely memory intensive.…
▽ More
Training computer-vision related algorithms on medical images for disease diagnosis or image segmentation is difficult due to the lack of training data, labeled samples, and privacy concerns. For this reason, a robust generative method to create synthetic data is highly sought after. However, most three-dimensional image generators require additional image input or are extremely memory intensive. To address these issues we propose adapting video generation techniques for 3-D image generation. Using the temporal GAN (TGAN) architecture, we show we are able to generate realistic head and neck PET images. We also show that by conditioning the generator on tumour masks, we are able to control the geometry and location of the tumour in the generated images. To test the utility of the synthetic images, we train a segmentation model using the synthetic images. Synthetic images conditioned on real tumour masks are automatically segmented, and the corresponding real images are also segmented. We evaluate the segmentations using the Dice score and find the segmentation algorithm performs similarly on both datasets (0.65 synthetic data, 0.70 real data). Various radionomic features are then calculated over the segmented tumour volumes for each data set. A comparison of the real and synthetic feature distributions show that seven of eight feature distributions had statistically insignificant differences (p>0.05). Correlation coefficients were also calculated between all radionomic features and it is shown that all of the strong statistical correlations in the real data set are preserved in the synthetic data set.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
