Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Berden, S

Learning to Learn in Interactive Constraint Acquisition

Authors: Dimos Tsouros, Senne Berden, Tias Guns

Abstract: Constraint Programming (CP) has been successfully used to model and solve complex combinatorial problems. However, modeling is often not trivial and requires expertise, which is a bottleneck to wider adoption. In Constraint Acquisition (CA), the goal is to assist the user by automatically learning the model. In (inter)active CA, this is done by interactively posting queries to the user, e.g., aski… ▽ More Constraint Programming (CP) has been successfully used to model and solve complex combinatorial problems. However, modeling is often not trivial and requires expertise, which is a bottleneck to wider adoption. In Constraint Acquisition (CA), the goal is to assist the user by automatically learning the model. In (inter)active CA, this is done by interactively posting queries to the user, e.g., asking whether a partial solution satisfies their (unspecified) constraints or not. While interac tive CA methods learn the constraints, the learning is related to symbolic concept learning, as the goal is to learn an exact representation. However, a large number of queries is still required to learn the model, which is a major limitation. In this paper, we aim to alleviate this limitation by tightening the connection of CA and Machine Learning (ML), by, for the first time in interactive CA, exploiting statistical ML methods. We propose to use probabilistic classification models to guide interactive CA to generate more promising queries. We discuss how to train classifiers to predict whether a candidate expression from the bias is a constraint of the problem or not, using both relation-based and scope-based features. We then show how the predictions can be used in all layers of interactive CA: the query generation, the scope finding, and the lowest-level constraint finding. We experimentally evaluate our proposed methods using different classifiers and show that our methods greatly outperform the state of the art, decreasing the number of queries needed to converge by up to 72%. △ Less

Submitted 17 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Comments: Accepted in AAAI

Decision-Focused Learning: Foundations, State of the Art, Benchmark and Future Opportunities

Authors: Jayanta Mandi, James Kotary, Senne Berden, Maxime Mulamba, Victor Bucarey, Tias Guns, Ferdinando Fioretto

Abstract: Decision-focused learning (DFL) is an emerging paradigm that integrates machine learning (ML) and constrained optimization to enhance decision quality by training ML models in an end-to-end system. This approach shows significant potential to revolutionize combinatorial decision-making in real-world applications that operate under uncertainty, where estimating unknown parameters within decision mo… ▽ More Decision-focused learning (DFL) is an emerging paradigm that integrates machine learning (ML) and constrained optimization to enhance decision quality by training ML models in an end-to-end system. This approach shows significant potential to revolutionize combinatorial decision-making in real-world applications that operate under uncertainty, where estimating unknown parameters within decision models is a major challenge. This paper presents a comprehensive review of DFL, providing an in-depth analysis of both gradient-based and gradient-free techniques used to combine ML and constrained optimization. It evaluates the strengths and limitations of these techniques and includes an extensive empirical evaluation of eleven methods across seven problems. The survey also offers insights into recent advancements and future research directions in DFL. Code and benchmark: https://github.com/PredOpt/predopt-benchmarks △ Less

Submitted 23 May, 2024; v1 submitted 25 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: Experimental Survey and Benchmarking

Guided Bottom-Up Interactive Constraint Acquisition

Authors: Dimos Tsouros, Senne Berden, Tias Guns

Abstract: Constraint Acquisition (CA) systems can be used to assist in the modeling of constraint satisfaction problems. In (inter)active CA, the system is given a set of candidate constraints and posts queries to the user with the goal of finding the right constraints among the candidates. Current interactive CA algorithms suffer from at least two major bottlenecks. First, in order to converge, they requir… ▽ More Constraint Acquisition (CA) systems can be used to assist in the modeling of constraint satisfaction problems. In (inter)active CA, the system is given a set of candidate constraints and posts queries to the user with the goal of finding the right constraints among the candidates. Current interactive CA algorithms suffer from at least two major bottlenecks. First, in order to converge, they require a large number of queries to be asked to the user. Second, they cannot handle large sets of candidate constraints, since these lead to large waiting times for the user. For this reason, the user must have fairly precise knowledge about what constraints the system should consider. In this paper, we alleviate these bottlenecks by presenting two novel methods that improve the efficiency of CA. First, we introduce a bottom-up approach named GrowAcq that reduces the maximum waiting time for the user and allows the system to handle much larger sets of candidate constraints. It also reduces the total number of queries for problems in which the target constraint network is not sparse. Second, we propose a probability-based method to guide query generation and show that it can significantly reduce the number of queries required to converge. We also propose a new technique that allows the use of openly accessible CP solvers in query generation, removing the dependency of existing methods on less well-maintained custom solvers that are not publicly available. Experimental results show that our proposed methods outperform state-of-the-art CA methods, reducing the number of queries by up to 60%. Our methods work well even in cases where the set of candidate constraints is 50 times larger than the ones commonly used in the literature. △ Less

Submitted 12 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Score Function Gradient Estimation to Widen the Applicability of Decision-Focused Learning

Authors: Mattia Silvestri, Senne Berden, Jayanta Mandi, Ali İrfan Mahmutoğulları, Brandon Amos, Tias Guns, Michele Lombardi

Abstract: Many real-world optimization problems contain parameters that are unknown before deployment time, either due to stochasticity or to lack of information (e.g., demand or travel times in delivery problems). A common strategy in such cases is to estimate said parameters via machine learning (ML) models trained to minimize the prediction error, which however is not necessarily aligned with the downstr… ▽ More Many real-world optimization problems contain parameters that are unknown before deployment time, either due to stochasticity or to lack of information (e.g., demand or travel times in delivery problems). A common strategy in such cases is to estimate said parameters via machine learning (ML) models trained to minimize the prediction error, which however is not necessarily aligned with the downstream task-level error. The decision-focused learning (DFL) paradigm overcomes this limitation by training to directly minimize a task loss, e.g. regret. Since the latter has non-informative gradients for combinatorial problems, state-of-the-art DFL methods introduce surrogates and approximations that enable training. But these methods exploit specific assumptions about the problem structures (e.g., convex or linear problems, unknown parameters only in the objective function). We propose an alternative method that makes no such assumptions, it combines stochastic smoothing with score function gradient estimation which works on any task loss. This opens up the use of DFL methods to nonlinear objectives, uncertain parameters in the problem constraints, and even two-stage stochastic optimization. Experiments show that it typically requires more epochs, but that it is on par with specialized methods and performs especially well for the difficult case of problems with uncertainty in the constraints, in terms of solution quality, scalability, or both. △ Less

Submitted 16 June, 2024; v1 submitted 11 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.