-
Popularity Signals in Trial-Offer Markets with Social Influence and Position Bias
Authors:
Felipe Maldonado,
Pascal Van Hentenryck,
Gerardo Berbeglia,
Franco Berbeglia
Abstract:
This paper considers trial-offer markets where consumer preferences are modeled by a multinomial logit with social influence and position bias. The social signal for a product is given by its current market share raised to power r (or equivalently the number of purchases raised to the power of r). The paper shows that, when r is strictly between 0 and 1, and a static position assignment (e.g., a q…
▽ More
This paper considers trial-offer markets where consumer preferences are modeled by a multinomial logit with social influence and position bias. The social signal for a product is given by its current market share raised to power r (or equivalently the number of purchases raised to the power of r). The paper shows that, when r is strictly between 0 and 1, and a static position assignment (e.g., a quality ranking) is used, the market converges to a unique equilibrium where the market shares depend only on product quality, not their initial appeals or the early dynamics. When r is greater than 1, the market becomes unpredictable. In many cases, the market goes to a monopoly for some product: Which product becomes a monopoly depends on the initial conditions of the market. These theoretical results are complemented by an agent-based simulation which indicates that convergence is fast when r is between 0 and 1, and that the quality ranking dominates the well-known popularity ranking in terms of market efficiency. These results shed a new light on the role of social influence which is often blamed for unpredictability, inequalities, and inefficiencies in markets. In contrast, this paper shows that, with a proper social signal and position assignment for the products, the market becomes predictable, and inequalities and inefficiencies can be controlled appropriately.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2017; v1 submitted 22 December, 2015;
originally announced December 2015.
-
Market Segmentation in Online Platforms
Authors:
Franco Berbeglia,
Gerardo Berbeglia,
Pascal Van Hentenryck
Abstract:
This paper studies ranking policies in a stylized trial-offer marketplace model, in which a single firm offers products and has consumers with heterogeneous preferences. Consumer trials are influenced by past purchases and the ranking of each product. The platform owner needs to devise a ranking policy to display the products to maximize the number of purchases in the long run. The model proposed…
▽ More
This paper studies ranking policies in a stylized trial-offer marketplace model, in which a single firm offers products and has consumers with heterogeneous preferences. Consumer trials are influenced by past purchases and the ranking of each product. The platform owner needs to devise a ranking policy to display the products to maximize the number of purchases in the long run. The model proposed attempts to understand the impact of market segmentation in a trial-offer market with social influence. In our model, consumer choices are based on a very general choice model known as the mixed MNL. We analyze the long-term dynamics of this highly complex stochastic model and we quantify the expected benefits of market segmentation. When past purchases are displayed, consumer heterogeneity makes buyers try the sub-optimal products, reducing the overall sales rate. We show that consumer heterogeneity makes the ranking problem NP-hard. We then analyze the benefits of market segmentation. We find tight bounds to the expected benefits of offering a distinct ranking to each consumer segment. Finally, we show that the market segmentation strategy always benefits from social influence when the average quality ranking is used. One of the managerial implications is that the firm is better off using an aggregate ranking policy when the variety of consumer preference is limited, but it should perform a market segmentation policy when consumers are highly heterogeneous. We also show that this result is robust to relatively small consumer classification mistakes; when these are large, an aggregate ranking is preferred.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2021; v1 submitted 2 November, 2015;
originally announced November 2015.
-
On the Optimality and Predictability of Cultural Markets with Social Influence
Authors:
Pascal Van Hentenryck,
Andres Abeliuk,
Franco Berbeglia,
Gerardo Berbeglia
Abstract:
Social influence is ubiquitous in cultural markets, from book recommendations in Amazon, to song popularities in iTunes and the ranking of newspaper articles in the online edition of the New York Times to mention only a few. Yet social influence is often presented in a bad light, often because it supposedly increases market unpredictability.
Here we study a model of trial-offer markets, in which…
▽ More
Social influence is ubiquitous in cultural markets, from book recommendations in Amazon, to song popularities in iTunes and the ranking of newspaper articles in the online edition of the New York Times to mention only a few. Yet social influence is often presented in a bad light, often because it supposedly increases market unpredictability.
Here we study a model of trial-offer markets, in which participants try products and later decide whether to purchase. We consider a simple policy which ranks the products by quality when presenting them to market participants. We show that, in this setting, market efficiency always benefits from social influence. Moreover, we prove that the market converges almost surely to a monopoly for the product of highest quality, making the market both predictable and asymptotically optimal. Computational experiments confirm that the quality ranking policy identifies "blockbusters" in reasonable time, outperforms other policies, and is highly predictable. These results indicate that social influence does not necessarily increase market unpredicatibility. The outcome really depends on how social influence is used.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2015; v1 submitted 10 May, 2015;
originally announced May 2015.
